Data Analysis RESEARCH FINDINGS

3 Relationship: Dr. Nevario as friend and Gru as Friend Dr. Nevario : A dozen boogie robots Boogie Look at this. Watch me Gru : Cookie robots I said cookie robots. Asserting Dr. Nevario : Okay. Im on it. Gru is disappointed with Dr. Nevario that he wants cookies robots not buggies robot. So he says “Cookie robots I said cookie robots” to give understanding to Dr. Nevario. Based on the fact, Dr. Nevario has problem in listening. So, he does not listen well. However, when meeting directly, he will understand the purpose. So, those reasons are background why those illocutionary acts do not fulfill the expected of perlocutionary acts. From the context, the same illocutionary act is asserting Based on the comparison of the conversation above, we can conclude that the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. The first conversation occurs over the phone so it can happen any time of hearing to communicate while the second conversation happened to meet in person and the speaker can explain it well. Therefore there will be different perlocutionary act. Datum 3 1 Addresser addressee: Children and Gru 2 Setting: Gru’s home 3 Relationship: Children as his children and Gru as their father Gru : Wow, wow Edith : It was your cousin’s idea Gru : What? Okay, bedtime. Ordering Children : Aw Because the children know that time is late night and they are tired. So, they only say Aw. It means t hey understand what Gru’s purpose from his utterance. 1 Addresser addressee: Children and Gru 2 Setting: Gru’s home 3 Relationship: Children as his children and Gru as their father Gru : Come on now, its bedtime. Ordering Children: But were not tired. Gru : Well, I am tired. The utterance But were not tired has meaning that they do not want sleep now because they are not tired. From the fact above, the answer of hearer is not like what is expected by the speaker because the children are not tired and time does not show lately. So, those reasons are background why those illocutionary acts do not fulfill the expected of perlocutionary acts. From the context, the same illocutionary acts is ordering. Based on the comparison of the conversation above, we can conclude that the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. The first conversation aims to protest over ignorance that they do not have a second conversation while mean that they do not want to sleep now. Therefore there will be different perlocutionary act. Datum 4 1 Addresser addressee: Gru and Agnes 2 Setting: Gru’s home 3 Relationship: Agnes as his child and Gru as her father Agnes : Will you read us a bedtime story? Requesting Gru : No Agnes : But we cant go to sleep without a bedtime story. Gru : Well, then its going to be a long night for you, isnt it? Based on the conversation above we know that Gru refuses what Agnes request because Gru is busy with his job to prepare stealing the moon. So, he says No to Agnes. 1 Addresser addressee: Gru and Agnes 2 Setting: Gru’s home 3 Relationship: Agnes as his child and Gru as her father Agnes : Will you read us a bedtime story? Requesting Gru : Fine Agnes : What about good night kisses? Gru : No, no. There will be no kissing or hugging or kissing. Based on the utterance above we know that Gru will read a bedtime story before they sleep. It happens because they will disturb Gru in his work if he does not read it. It always happens to all parents in this world because children need something to make their sleep quietly. So, that the reason is background why those illocutionary acts do not fulfill the expected of perlocutionary acts. .From the context, the same illocutionary acts is requesting. Based on the comparison of the conversation above, we can conclude that the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. The first conversation aims to avoid a troublesome job because there are many things to be prepared while the latter aims to make children go to bed and do not interfere with the work unfinished. Therefore there will be different perlocutionary act. Datum 5 1 Addresser addressee: Children and Gru 2 Setting: Gru’s home 3 Relationship: Children as his children and Gru as their father Gru : So, good night, sleep tight, and dont let the bed bugs bite Threaten Children : Hes just kidding, Agnes. The conversation above is Gru only jokes to the children that the bugs will bite them when they sleep. It is a way of parent in education of their child. But, it will be worst way to give education for child because they will be scary of the bugs or they will not sleep well. 1 Addresser addressee: Children and Gru 2 Setting: Gru’s home 3 Relationship: Children as his children and Gru as their father Gru: Good night, sleep tight, dont let the bedbugs blah-blah-blah Threaten Children: Whoa The utterance Whoa Is the fact that the children study from their experience. So, they will not afraid again. It is the reason why those illocutionary acts do not fulfill the expected of perlocutionary acts. Sometimes, the way of giving education to our children is not always right. So, as good parents, we must make different or interesting way in education our children. From the context, the same illocutionary acts is asserting. Based on the comparison of the conversation above, we can conclude that the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. The first conversation occurs as a form of Agnes entertaining conversation not to be afraid while the second occurred because the children already know the actions of ignorant Gru to scare them. Therefore there will be different perlocutionary act. Datum 6 1 Addresser addressee: Gru and Children 2 Setting: Gru’s home 3 Relationship: Children as his children and Gru as their father Children: Oh, come on. Its fun. Praising Gru: No Stop No one is ever getting out there Ever Gru is angry because he is scary that the past will happen again in date. So, the plan of blind date is not fun Addresser addressee: Gru and Lucy Setting: Lucy’s home Relationship: Lucy as his friend and Gru as her friend Lucy: This is fun. Praising Gru : Yes. Surprisingly, it was. Gru agrees with Lucy because he loves Lucy. What they did with Lucy is very fun because also he will be with Lucy. Love changes a person with also his world. So, it is background why those illocutionary acts do not fulfill the expected of perlocutionary acts. From the context, the same illocutionary acts is praising. Praising is shape of expression of psychological attitude of the speaker. Based on the comparison of the conversations above, we can conclude that the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. The first conversation occurred with a view rejected as a bad thing happened the past while the second, Gru enjoyed it just happened because Gru liked it. Therefore there will be different perlocutionary act. Datum 7 1 Addresser addressee: Gru and El Macho 2 Setting: El Macho’s restaurant 3 Relationship: El Macho as his friend and Gru as his friend El Macho: Oh, oh Im sorry. Pollito is usually very friendly Apoligizing . Gru: Well, we really should be going. Girls, come on. Gru knows that El Macho’s pet see him last. So, he must leave quickly from that restaurant. So, he only says Well, we really should be going. Girls, come on. 1 Addresser addressee: Lucy and El Macho 2 Setting: El Macho’s house 3 Relationship: El Macho as her friend and Lucy as his friend El Macho: Lucia, I apologize. The same thing happened the other day with Gru, and.. Apoligizing . Lucy: Oh, well, speaking of Gru, um, have you seen him? I really need to talk to him. Based on the context above we know that Lucy looks for Gru. So, she does not care the asking pardon of El Macho because he really wants to meet Gru to State her feeling. The fact above is the reason why the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker. Sometimes, what people think, make people forget something or situation. This phenomenon always happens in our life. From the context, the same illocutionary acts is apoligizing. Apoligizing is shape of expression of psychological attitude of the speaker. Based on the comparison of the conversation above, we can conclude that the the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition. The first conversation occurred to avoid or run away from problems before getting caught by El Macho while the second conversation occurred because Lucy rush to immediately meet Gru therefore he ignores the existing problems. Therefore there will be different perlocutionary act. 28

CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

In process of understanding the utterances in movie, there are many problems which is faced by the spectator especially the children. The common problem is the children cannot understand the purpose of conversation because they are not used to talking to adult. Based on research questions in chapter one, in this part the writer gives an answer about why the hearer in the movie Despicable Me 1: SuperBad, SuperDad and the movie Despicable Me 2: When The World Needed a Hero, They Called a Villian did not give the epected reaction of the illocutionary acts of the speaker. After analyzing the data in chapter three, the writer draws some conclusions about his research. First, from selected data of some illocutionary acts, the writer founds the perlocutionary act is not like what is expected by the speaker in the different condition because from the past, the experience, or the background of the hearer. These factors are very big influence of the perlocutionary acts that are expected by speaker. So, the reason the answer of hearer is not like expected by speaker relates the condition of the hearer.

B. Suggestion

Through this research, the writer suggests the other researchers can deeply analyze the data resulting in unexpected perlocutionary acts based on context in different media such as the advertisement, social media, or other written media. Moreover, for the researchers who are interested in speech acts, it is good to examine more on perlocutionary acts because there are only a few researchers elaborate on it. Then, the researchers who are interested in this topic, can analyze participants of the study from the past, the experience, or the background of the character to get the information in understanding of the conversation in the movie. Finally, the writer hopes this research will be usefull for the future improvement of pragmatics study, basically perlocutionary acts theory used in this movie, especially Adab and Humanities Faculty, State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 30 BIBLIOGRAPHY Akhimien, P.E. 2010. „Perlocution: Heeling the “Achilleas’ Heel” of Speech Act Theory’s. Vol.XXXV , Nigeria: State University of Lagos, Lagos, pp.1-16. Altikriti, Sahar Four. 2011. Speech Act Analysis to Short Story. Journal Language Teaching and Research, Vol.2, No. 6. Ariff, Tun Nur Afizah Zainal dan Mugableh, Ahmad Ibrahim.2013. “Speech Act of Promising among Jordan, ”. Brown, Gillian and George Yule. Discourse Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1983. Farkhan, Muhammad. Proposal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Adabia Press. 2011. Fromkin, Victoria. Robert Rodman and Nina Hyams. An Introduction to Language 7th Ed. New York: Heinle. 2003. Gunawan, Asim. Pragmatik: Teori dan Kajian pustaka Nusantara. Jakarta: Univ Atma Jaya. 2007. Holsti, Ole R. Content Analysis. In G. Lindzey E. Aaoroson edition: The Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1986. Kushartanti. Pragmatik. In Kushartanti, Untung Yuwono and Multamia LMT Rauder. Pesona Bahasa Langkah Awal Memahami Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 2007.