ch nic
al G
uid eli
ne s f
or E
va lu
ati ng
th e M
an ag
em en
t E ffe
cti ve
ne ss
o f A
qu ati
c, C
oa sts
a nd
S m
all Is
la nd
s C on
se rv
ati on
A re
as E
-K K
P 3K
28
Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas E-KKP3K
29 29
32
CRITERIA NO.
QUESTION ANSWER
VERIFICATION TOOL REMARKS
Yes No
4. Resource Management
B58
What is the condition of fish populations or non-fish target
species populations in the conservation area?
Self-explanatory. Users should select one from the
options B58A to B58F that is most relevant to the
situation and type of area.
B58A
Have fish populations been maintained or increased in the
core zone, sustainable fisheries zone, and use zone?
Fish population monitoring reports for conservation targets including
biomass, number of fish species, abundance, diversity.
Self-explanatory.
B58B
Has the quality length and weight of dominant fish species in the core zone,
sustainable fisheries zone, use zone andor restricted use zone capture
fisheries been maintained or improved?
Quality lengthweight monitoring reports of fish in these zones.
Self-explanatory.
B58C
Has the volume of fishers’ catches in the sustainable fisheries
zonerestricted use zone been maintained or improved?
Monitoring reports on the volume of fishers’ catches total biomass per
number of fishers per unittime period.
Self-explanatory.
B58D
Have fisher production volumes in the sustainable fisheries zonerestricted
use zone aquaculture been maintained or improved?
Monitoring reports on aquaculture production volumes biomass per
number of fishers per unittime period.
Self-explanatory.
B58E
Have the number and diversity of non-fish target species in the core
zone, sustainable use zone andor restricted use zone been
maintained or increased? Monitoring reports on number and
diversity of non-fish target species. Self-explanatory.
B58F
Have populations of endemic species been maintained or increased?
Monitoring reports on endemic species populations.
Self-explanatory.
33
Level BLUE: stage 4 – conservation area managed optimally continued CRITERIA
NO. QUESTION
ANSWER VERIFICATION TOOL
REMARKS
Yes No
14. Resource Management
B59 Has research and development
relevant to the area been carried out to support
management activities? Published research development
documents. Self-explanatory.
B60 Is use of the area’s resources
organized, without having a negative impact on habitats
populations in the area? Analysis of resource use reports
and habitatpopulation monitoring reports.
Self-explanatory.
15. Socio- economic
cultural management
B61 Does management of the
conservation area accommodate local traditional
and cultural conditions andor local knowledge?
Reports of interviews with indigenous peoples.
Self-explanatory.
B62 Has the level of community
support for management of the conservation area
increased? Report of monitoring of local
community perceptions which indicate increased community
awareness of and action that supports conservation area
management. Self-explanatory.
B63 Has community participation in
management of the conservation area increased?
Report of conservation area management activities that
indicate community representation and participation in all
management processes, or community participation in
implementing programs that are relevant to the community.
Self-explanatory.
ch nic
al G
uid eli
ne s f
or E
va lu
ati ng
th e M
an ag
em en
t E ffe
cti ve
ne ss
o f A
qu ati
c, C
oa sts
a nd
S m
all Is
la nd
s C on
se rv
ati on
A re
as E
-K K
P 3K
30
Technical Guidelines for Evaluating the Management Effectiveness of Aquatic, Coasts and Small Islands Conservation Areas E-KKP3K
31 31
34
CRITERIA NO.
QUESTION ANSWER
VERIFICATION TOOL REMARKS
Yes No
15. Socio- economic
cultural management
B64 Has the incidence of breaches
in the conservation area decreased?
Patrol reports containing data about illegal and environmental unfriendly
activities, and the number of habitats damaged in the conservation area
time series reports, community patrol reports.
Self-explanatory.
B65 Do stakeholders use the
conservation area as a place for training and education?
Reports on training and education in the conservation area.
Self-explanatory. B66
Do tourism activities in the conservation area provide
socio-economic benefits to stakeholders, particularly the
local community? Impact analysis of tourism
activities in the conservation area. Self-explanatory.
B67 Do aquaculture activities in the
conservation area provide socio-economic benefits to
stakeholders, particularly the local community?
Impact analysis of aquaculture activities in the conservation area.
Self-explanatory.
B68 Do capture fisheries activities in
the conservation area provide socio-economic benefits to
stakeholders, particularly the local community?
Impact analysis of capture fisheries in the conservation area.
Self-explanatory.
Total number of ‘Yes’ answers Percentage
35 Level
Stage
Gold
5: Self Sustaining Conservation Area
CRITERIA NO.
QUESTION ANSWER
VERIFICATION TOOL REMARKS
Yes No
13. Institutionaliz
