Conclusions CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

86 the audience to gain the meaning of the sentence. This phenomenon indicated there were four sub-patterns of post-noun modification that were undiscovered in the transcripts. In short, a complex noun phrase might pose the misinterpretation of understanding the meaning of each topic sentence. To avoid the misinterpretation in speech, confining the noun phrase construction is needed.

B. Recommendations

Since the analysis of grammar is interesting to be conducted, there are some recommendations proposed for constructing the further studies. In this research, the researcher only emphasizes on the analysis of post-noun modification occurring in the speech transcripts of Marty Natalegawa. Literally, this research can be beneficial for the practical field as well as in the academic field, typically either educational or linguistic studies. For the educational study, the researcher expects the object of this research can be used as a proper material for ‘Structure’ and ‘Syntax’ courses in English Language Education Study Program ELESP of Sanata Dharma University. In ‘Structure’ course, the students are able to expand their knowledge to analyze the structure of the noun phrase modification constructed either in formal speech or text. Besides, the students enables to observe the process of the modification by noticing the existence of the X’ bar theory in ‘Syntax’ course. In addition, this research is also expected to be a consideration in designing the syllabuses employed in ‘Structure’ and ‘Syntax’ courses. 87 It follows, that, this analysis can be beneficial for teachers as reference to consider the syntactic process of language in the classroom. As teachers, they can adopt the subject of this research as the reference to introduce the global issues towards the students. The researcher expects that this subject can be beneficial for students to enhance their critical thinking in criticizing and solving the problems. Furthermore, the students of English Language Education Study Program ELESP of Sanata Dharma University can use the object of the study as the proper material to test the students’ comprehension or perception towards grammar occurring in the formal speech or text. For the linguistic study, since this research is related to the study of English grammar, this research can be employed as a proper reference to conduct the critical discourse analysis or other pragmatics and semantics field. To converge those fields, determining the speech acts can be possible to be conducted in order to find out the function or the meaning of those complexities. 88 REFERENCES Aarts, F., Aarts, J. 1982. English syntactic structures. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd. Ary, D., Jacob, L.C., Sorensen, C. 2010. Introduction to research in education 8 th ed.. Belmont, CA: Wardsworth. Baker, C.L. 1989. English syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Crystal, D. 2003. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. De Mönnink, I. 2000. On the move: the mobility of constituents in the English noun phrase: A multi-method approach. Amsterdam Atlanta: Rodopi. Dwijatmoko, B.B. 2002. English syntax. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press. Fasold, R. Jeff, C. 2006. An introduction to language and linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. 2008. How to design and evaluate research in education 7 th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., Borg, W. R. 2007. Educational research: An introduction 8 th ed.. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Greenbaum, S., Nelson, G. 2002. An introduction to English grammar 2 nd ed.. London: Person Education Limited. Greenbaum, S., Quirk, R. 1997. A student’s grammar of the English language. London: Pearson Education Ltd. Hardy, C., Harley, B., Phillips, N. 2004. Discourse analysis and content analysis: Two solitudes?, 2 1, 19-22. Retrieved on 31 January, 2015, from n https:www1.maxwell.syr.eduuploadedFilesmoynihancqrmNewsl etter2.1.pdf. Herrera, Y.M., Braumoller, B.F. 2004. Symposium: Discourse and content analysis, 2 1, 16-19. Retrieved on 31 January, 2015, from https:www1.maxwell.syr.eduuploadedFilesmoynihancqrmNewsletter2 .1.pdf.