26
M =
x �
Note: M = mean
x = sum of score N = total number of participants
For  the  second  part  of  the  questionnaire,  the  writer  summarized  the participants’  opinions  and  suggestions  into  paragraphs.  This  data  was  used  to
improve the designed materials. After the data from the evaluators were analyzed, it showed that the materials were acceptable. In the first part of questionnaire, the
evaluators  stated  their  degree  of  agreement  on  the  statements.  The  result  ranged from  3-  3.67,  indicating  that  the  materials  were  well-developed.  The  completed
result  of  expert  validation  can  be  seen  in  Table  3.1  The  Result  of  Expert
Validation
.
Table 3.1 The Result of Expert Validation No.
Respondents’ opinion Central Tendency
N
x
Mean A.
Learning Indicators
1. The  indicators  are  suitable  with  the  competence
standard 3
11 3.67
2. The  indicators  are  suitable  with  the  basic
competences 3
11 3.67
3. The indicators are well-formulated
3 9
3
B. Learning Materials
4. The  materials  help  the  students  to  achieve  the
indicators 3
11 3. 67
5. The materials are suitable to teach speaking for tenth
grade students 3
11 3. 67
6. The activities are fun
3 9
3
27
No. Respondents’ opinion
Central Tendency N
x
Mean
7. The activities are motivating
3 9
3 8.
The contents are suitable with the students’ need 3
10 3.33
9. The contents are well-elaborated
3 9
3 10.
The instructions are clear 3
10 3.33
11. The instructions are understandable
3 10
3.33 12.
The designed materials are within the time allocation 3
9 3
C. Teacher’s Guide
13. The teacher’s guide is helpful
3 10
3. 33 14.
The teacher’s guide is understandable 3
11 3. 67
15. The  syllabus  is  able  to  give  illustration  about  the
materials 3
10 3.33
C. Implementation
of Task-Based
Language Teaching
16. The activities are encourage students to speak
3 10
3.33 17.
“Recall you memory” section helps to introduce the topic to the students
3 9
3 18.
“Be  ready”  and  “What  to  say”  sections  give students the vocabulary, language and context for the
tasks 3
9 3
19. “Let’s  practice”  section  facilitates  students  to
produce language 3
10 3.33
21. “Be  ready”,  “What  to  say”    and  “Let’s  practice”
sections  facilitate  students  actively  using  the  target language
3 10
3.33 22.
“Time to reflect” section encourage students to share their feeling
3 9
3
E. Overall evaluation
23. In overall, the designed materials are well-developed
3 10
3.33
In  the  second  part  of  the  questionnaire,  the  evaluators  gave  their comments  and  suggestions  about  the  designed  materials  freely.  The  evaluators’
comments  and  suggestion  were  helpful  and  important  in  order  to  improve  the designed  materials.  There  were  three  questions  in  the  second  part,  first  question
asked  about  the  evaluators’  comment  on  the  designed  materials.  The  second