31
Table 3.6 Interpretations of the Average Points Range
Meaning
1.00 – 1.99
Replace the rejected part of the design 2.00
– 2.99 Add more part or modify part of the design based on the lack on the
statement 3.00
– 3.99 Conduct more exploration on the existing part of the design based on
the statement 4.00
– 5.00 No revision
Then,  the  researcher  made  the  improvement  of  the  design  based  on  the data.  The  result  of  the  design  evaluation  of  the  designed  materials  became  the
significant main sources in this process. It contained feedback and evaluation from the experts.
G. Research Procedures
In order to have valid and reliable data for the instructional design of writing materials  for  the  eighth-grade  students  of  SMPN  15  Yogyakarta,  the  researcher
made the steps in the certain ways. The steps were arranged and carried through, so later those steps helped the writer to collect the data. The procedures were explained
as follows. The  first  step  is  research  and  information  collecting.  In  this  step,  the
researcher  gathered  the  information  dealing  with  syllabus  used.  Besides,  the researcher  collected  the  base  information  of  this  step  from  the  observation  of
teaching-learning  process  in  the  classroom.  The  researcher  also  got  the information from the interview with two English teachers from the school. After
the  researcher  gathered  the  result  of  research  and  information  collecting,  the researcher started to state units, topics, and objectives, define skill, make lesson
plan  and  small  scale  feasibility  test,  and  determine  sequence.  The  next  stage  is developing preliminary field test. In this stage, the researcher started to design the
32 materials  using  EGRA technique.  In  this  stage, the researcher listed  the subject
contents  and  made  the  instructional  materials.  In  the  next  stage,  the  researcher conducted an evaluation of the materials by distributing the questionnaires to an
English teacher of SMPN 15 Yogyakarta and to two lecturers of Sanata Dharma University in the English Language Education Study Program. For the last step,
the researcher made the better materials based on the feedbacks and suggestions. The result of the questionnaires was used to make a better designed materials for
the eighth-grade students of SMPN 15 Yogyakarta. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI