The Participants of Research and Information Collecting
                                                                                30 data. After that, the researcher made the interpretation of the result in the form of
paragraph.
Table 3.3 The Result of the Questionnaire Questions
Response Number
Percentage
In analyzing the model of design that had been made, the researcher used Likert scale. It aimed to support the process of modifying the instructional writing
English  material  using  EGRA  technique.  The  researcher  gave  four  options  to present  the  respondent
s’  agreement  and  disagreement  for  each  statement.  The options were presented in Table 3.4.
Table 3.4 Degrees of Agreement
Point of Agreement Meaning
1 Absolutely disagree
2 Disagree
4 Agree
5 Absolutely agree
In  calculating  the  data  of  this  questionnaire,  the  researcher  used descriptive statistics.  In this case, the researcher used the questionnaire data to
find the number of case and the mean. The researcher made a table of the central tendency of the respondents on the designed materials.
Table 3.5 The Description of the Evaluation of Design Material Participants
No Respondents’
Opinion Frequency Point of Agreement
Central Tendency
1 2
4 5
N Mn
Best  1970  stated , “the average points are divided from 1 up to 5” p.
179. The interpretations of the average points were presented in Table 3.6. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
Table 3.6 Interpretations of the Average Points Range
Meaning
1.00 – 1.99
Replace the rejected part of the design 2.00
– 2.99 Add more part or modify part of the design based on the lack on the
statement 3.00
– 3.99 Conduct more exploration on the existing part of the design based on
the statement 4.00
– 5.00 No revision
Then,  the  researcher  made  the  improvement  of  the  design  based  on  the data.  The  result  of  the  design  evaluation  of  the  designed  materials  became  the
significant main sources in this process. It contained feedback and evaluation from the experts.