The Participants of Research and Information Collecting
30 data. After that, the researcher made the interpretation of the result in the form of
paragraph.
Table 3.3 The Result of the Questionnaire Questions
Response Number
Percentage
In analyzing the model of design that had been made, the researcher used Likert scale. It aimed to support the process of modifying the instructional writing
English material using EGRA technique. The researcher gave four options to present the respondent
s’ agreement and disagreement for each statement. The options were presented in Table 3.4.
Table 3.4 Degrees of Agreement
Point of Agreement Meaning
1 Absolutely disagree
2 Disagree
4 Agree
5 Absolutely agree
In calculating the data of this questionnaire, the researcher used descriptive statistics. In this case, the researcher used the questionnaire data to
find the number of case and the mean. The researcher made a table of the central tendency of the respondents on the designed materials.
Table 3.5 The Description of the Evaluation of Design Material Participants
No Respondents’
Opinion Frequency Point of Agreement
Central Tendency
1 2
4 5
N Mn
Best 1970 stated , “the average points are divided from 1 up to 5” p.
179. The interpretations of the average points were presented in Table 3.6. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
Table 3.6 Interpretations of the Average Points Range
Meaning
1.00 – 1.99
Replace the rejected part of the design 2.00
– 2.99 Add more part or modify part of the design based on the lack on the
statement 3.00
– 3.99 Conduct more exploration on the existing part of the design based on
the statement 4.00
– 5.00 No revision
Then, the researcher made the improvement of the design based on the data. The result of the design evaluation of the designed materials became the
significant main sources in this process. It contained feedback and evaluation from the experts.