ETHICS APPROVAL LIMITATIONS METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER three Response Rate 30 National Medical Care Statistics 2014

CHAPTER 3: RESPONSE RATE

3.1 RESPONSE RATE

This chapter describes the survey sample and the response rate for NMCS 2014. A total of 139 public clinics and 1,002 private clinics were sampled in NMCS 2014. The clinics are listed in Appendix 5. The response rates were calculated as the number of clinics that responded by returning the NMCS 2014 questionnaire divided by the number of clinics in the sample. Table 3.1.1 shows the number of clinics sampled, number of clinics responded to the survey and the clinic response rate for each state or federal territory. Table 3.1.1: Total number clinics sampled and responde d or NMCS 2014 State f deral territory Public Private Number o f linics sampled Number f clinics responded Response rate Number o f linics sampled Number f clinics responded Response rate Johor 11 10 90.9 117 43 36.7 Kedah 7 7 100.0 55 22 40.0 Kelantan 7 7 100.0 45 22 48.9 Melaka 26 23 88.5 31 14 45.2 Negeri Sembilan 6 5 83.3 40 19 47.5 Pahang 6 6 100.0 42 18 42.9 Perak 11 11 100.0 73 30 41.1 Perlis 9 7 77.8 10 7 70.0 Pulau Pinang 5 5 100.0 70 33 47.1 Sabah WP Labuan 9 7 77.8 65 26 40.0 Sarawak 10 10 100.0 34 16 47.1 Selangor WP Putrajaya 15 14 93.3 270 102 37.8 Terengganu 5 5 100.0 30 18 60.0 WP Kuala Lumpur 12 12 100.0 120 46 38.3 Total 139 129 92. 8 1,002 416 41.5 Overall, more than three quarters of public clinics from thirteen states and three federal territories responded to NMCS 2014. The maximum response rate was 100.0 while the minimum is 77.8, which gave the overall response rate of 92.8 in public sector. As for private sector, the lowest response rate was only 37.6, bringing the overall response rate to 41.5, in spite of our fervent attempts to persuade the GPs to participate. Response rates by encounters are reported in Table 3.1.2. These response rates were calculated as the number of encounters that were recorded for NMCS 2014 divided by the expected number of encounters in the sample for each stratum to form a national representative data. 31 Chapter 3 : Response Rate 11 9 117 7 55 7 45 26 5 31 6 3 40 6 42 11 73 9 8 10 5 70 9 8 65 10 34 aya 15 3 270 5 30 12 120 139 002 Table 3.1.2: Total number encounters received or NMCS 2014 State ederal territory Public Private Number encounters expected Number encounter responded Response rate Number encounters expected Number o encounter responded Response rate Johor 1,164 1,753 100.0 3,597 1,295 36.0 Kedah 746 627 84.0 1,694 803 47.4 Kelantan 778 621 79.8 1,395 607 43.5 Melaka 450 2,357 100.0 941 325 34.5 Negeri Sembilan 697 510 73.2 1,223 739 60.4 Pahang 698 494 70.8 1,277 532 41.7 Perak 1,174 1,375 100.0 2,228 807 36.2 Perlis 152 581 100.0 320 323 100.0 Pulau Pinang 581 794 100.0 2,139 917 42.9 Sabah WP Labuan 927 709 76.5 1,997 736 36.9 Sarawak 1,062 947 89.2 1,056 567 53.7 Selangor WP Putrajaya 1,627 1,707 100.0 8,265 2,691 32.6 Terengganu 498 383 76.9 929 575 61.9 WP Kuala Lumpur 397 2,612 100.0 3,671 1,200 32.7 Total 10,951 15,470 100.0 30,732 12,117 39.4 Response rate by encounters obtained from public clinics of all thirteen states and three federal territories were overwhelming and some exceeded 100.0. WP Kuala Lumpur recorded the highest response rate with more than six times encounters that were required for the study, while the lowest was 70.8 from Pahang. As for private sector, the minimum response rate by encounters was 32.7 from WP Kuala Lumpur, while Perlis recorded the maximum response rate of 100.0. The overall response rate for public and private sector was 100.0 and 39.4, respectively. The low response rate however, has already been anticipated and accounted for. When calculating sample size, the sampling matrix had included an estimation of a 30.0 drop-out rate from the public and a 70.0 drop-out rate from the private sector. This huge estimated rate of drop-out from the private sector was expected based on previous studies conducted comparing public and private health sectors in Malaysia. The reported response rate from private clinics in these studies was between 26.0 and 33.0. 1,2 The same observation was made in Australia in the BEACH survey, with only 25.9 and 25.2 of the contactable general practitioners agreed and completed the survey in 2013-14 and 2012-13 respectively. 3,4 32 National Medical Care Statistics 2014

3.2 THE ENC

O ERS A total of 27,813 encounters were collected for NMCS 2014. Of these, 226 encounters were excluded from analysis; 61 of incomplete forms and 165 with data inconsistencies. The final encounters for analysis were 27,587; 15,470 from public and 12,117 from private. The dataset were weighted to adjust for over and under representativeness of data see Section 2.5. Table 3.2.1 shows the observed and weighted total for each data element. The final weighted patient encounters were 325,818, and the results are presented as weighted estimates in this report. Table 3.2.1: Observed and weighted dataset or NMCS 2014 Variable Observed Weighted Overall Public Private Overall Public Private Encounters 27,587 15,470 12,117 325,818 131,624 194,194 Reasons for encounter 50,642 29,478 21,164 597,563 252,050 345,513 Diagnoses 38,151 23,760 14,391 436,743 203,868 232,874 Medications 70,711 38,296 32,415 864,552 327,087 537,465 Investigations 14,208 12,182 2,026 143,758 108,557 35,201 Advicecounselling and procedures 12,926 9,500 3,426 136,708 77,670 59,038 Follow-up and referrals 9,841 8,143 1,698 100,709 72,418 28,291 REFERENCES 1. Teng CL, Tong SF, Khoo EM, Lee , Zailinawati AH, Mimi O, et al. Antibiotics for URTI and UTI – prescribing in Malaysian primary care settings. Aust Fam Physician. 2011 May;405:325-9. 2. Mimi O, Tong SF, Nordin S, Teng CL, Khoo EM, Abdul-Rahman A, et al. A comparison of morbidity patterns in public and private primary care clinics in Malaysia. Malays Fam Physician. 2011 Apr 30;61:19-25. 3. Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, Bayram C, Harrison C, alenti L, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2013–14. Sydney Australia: Sydney University Press; 2014. General practice series; no. 36. 4. Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, Bayram C , alenti L, Harrison C, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2012–13. Sydney Australia: Sydney University Press; 2013. General practice series; no. 33.