Classifying the Scores Criterion of Assessment Method of Analyzing Questionnaire Method of Analyzing Field Notes

33 V. Style and quality of expression 20-18 Excellent to Good 17-15 Good to Adequate 14-12 Adequate to Fair 11-6 Unacceptable 5-1 Not college-level work The range score of each component was 1-20. Therefore, the maximum score for each student was 100. The test result was by adding the score in each component. The application of the scoring system was based on the condition and ability of students.

3.5.2 Classifying the Scores

The scores were converted into numerical data. There are five items and each item is scored 20, so the maximum score is 100. In classifying score, the writer used the measurement students‟ achievement suggested by Harris 1969: 134. Table 3.4 The Measurement of the Students’ Achievement Criteria of Mastery Grade 91-100 81-90 71-80 61-70 51-60 Less than 50 Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Very poor 34

3.5.3 Criterion of Assessment

The students‟ success and failure in doing the activities planned above were measured by referring to the criterion issued by the Department of Education and Culture. To find the d egree of students‟ achievement in each activity, the score of average student is counted by using the following formula:

3.5.4 Method of Analyzing Questionnaire

In analyzing questionnaire the writer took some steps. 1 grading the items The writer used Heaton‟s score ranges cited in Fitri Yuni Asih 2010: 54. It could be seen as follows. Table 3.5 The Score Range of Questionnaire Options Score a 1 b 2 c 3 2 tabulating the data 3 calculating the mean The writer used formula as follows. the sum of the scores The average : the number of scores 35 4 matching the mean to the criterion The writer matched the mean of questionnaire result to the criteria below quoted from Heaton in Fitri Yuni Asih 2010: 54: Table 3.6 Classification of Graded Scores of Questionnaire Range of Mean Students‟ Interest The Relevance The Advantage Students‟ Achievement Sustainability 0.00-1.00 Low Not relevant Not helpful Low Not necessary 1.01-2.00 Medium Relevant Helpful Medium Necessary 2.01-3.00 High Very relevant Very helpful High Very necessary

3.5.5 Method of Analyzing Field Notes

From the field notes, the writer tried to describe and analyzed the condition during the action research process. It would be explained clearly based on the aspects which the writer used in making the field notes.

3.5.6 Method of Analyzing the Observation