23
3.2.2 Hardware and Software
Some instruments and software were used to support the field data recording and data analysis process. The hardware and software needed are shown
in Table 7. Table 7 Hardware and Software
No. HardwareSoftware
Specification Function
1. Hand held GPS receiver
Garmin 76 CSX Positioning
2. Camera digital
Pocket Camera Digital Documentation
3. Mobile Computer
Acer Notebook with Intel Core 2 Duo 2.1 GHz, 4
Gigabytes of Ram Processing Unit
4. Color Printer
Hp Deskjet F2276 Hardcopy
5. ArcGis
Version 9.2 Spatial Data
analysis 6.
ArcView Version 3.3
Spatial Data analysis
7. ER Mapper
Version 7.0 Classification of
Plantation
8. Expert Choice
version 9.50A05
AHP analysis
3.3 Methods
Prior to GIS data analysis, data preparation was done. Spatial data were generated based on UTM Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system
Zone 48 South and WGS 84 datum. The main stages carried out in this study were as follows: 1 analysis of Land Suitability for rubber plantation; 2 rubber
production analysis; 3 Multi Criteria Analysis. Figure 4 shows the methodology flow chart of this research.
3.3.1 Land Suitability Analysis for Rubber Plantation
Land suitability analysis is to estimate the environment condition in order
to determine plant types that are suitable to be planted on a given area. Generally,
factors that can be considered for land suitability analysis are soil, slope, climate, and water availability.
24
N
Y Non Suitable
Rubber, low Prod Suitable
Rubber, low Prod Suitable
Rubber, high Prod Non Suitable
Rubber, high Prod Retained
Change with other Commodity
Retained Developed Management
Production
Priority Development of Rubber Plantation
Shrub
?
Developed Multi
Criteria Analysis
Spatial Analyze
Overlay Productivity of rubber
Non Suitable and Non Rubber Excluded
Suitable and Rubber Suitable and Non Rubber
Non Suitable and Rubber Land Suitability for
Rubber Plantation
Existing Rubber of Land Use
Overlay Spatial Data
Tabular Da
ta
Data base
Figure 4 Methodology Flowchart of the Research
25
Land suitability analysis is intended to determine suitable land for cultivating specific crops or other utilization relating to agricultural activities
FAO, 1976 in Hananto, 2007.
This analysis based on is on the suitability of growing to plants the physical condition of environment consisting of soil, climate and topographic
datamaps. Climate data consist of annual rainfall, number of dry months and number of wet months. Air temperature was derived from weather stations. Soil
data considered in the land characteristic include soil drainage and soil texture. Topographic data consist of contour and processed to derive slope classes. The
aim of this analysis is to determine land suitability for rubber plantation. To assess the overall suitability, a scoring and weighting system is applied to the various
aspects of suitability are as follows: o
Rainfall data generated from monthly average precipitation data which has been collected and averaged from many years.
o Temperature data were generated such as rainfall data.
o Slope data for topography information derived from DEM of elevation data
using contour line shape format. o
Soil texture and soil drainage data as physical soil characteristic information. In this study, every criterion was considered as they have an equal
importance and has been given the same score in the scoring procedure, a score was assigned as shown in Table 8 depends on the input factor value.
Table 8 Structure of Suitability Classification Categories Class
Score Suitability Class
S1 S2
S3 N
1 2
3 4
Highly Suitability Moderately Suitability
Marginally Suitability Not Suitability
The scoring procedure was done for each factor so that there were 6 scores altogether. The total score was calculated by doing a sum all scores.
26
Total score = [rainfall score] + [temperature score] + [soil texture score] + [soil drainage score] + [elevation score] + [slope score]
The suitability grade was calculated by averaging the total scores. Total score
Suitability grade = 6
Table 9 Relations between Suitability Grades and Classes Suitability Grade
Suitability Class S = 1
1 S =2 2 S = 3
3 S = 4 Highly Suitability
Moderately Suitability Marginally Suitability
Not Suitability In agriculture, the land is highly suitable for all factors then it can be
assumed that it is highly suitable for rubber plantation. But if there is one or more factors not highly suitable, then it cannot be considered as highly suitable. In this
case, if the suitability grade S is equal to 1, then it is assigned as highly suitable S1 because the requirement for every factor is highly suitable. The suitability
site classification steps are described in Flowchart shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5 Flowchart of Land Suitability for Rubber Plantation
Climate
Rainfall Temperature
Land Suitability for
Rubber Plantation
Overlay Suitability
Climate Map Topographic Map
Soil Map Overlay
Overlay Overlay
Soil
Soil Texture Soil Drainage
Topography
Elevation Slope
27
3.3.2 Analysis of Existing Land Use Types