D. Instrument of the Study
The instrument of this research was test. The test was reading test passage. The tests consist of 17 multiple choice items taken from some reading book and 8
matching question items. The score was 1 for each correct item and 0 for incorrect item.  The  stud
ents‟  total  correct  answer  timed  with  four  in  order  to  get  perfect score, a hundred.  It was held before treatment and after treatment.  In addition the
test should be valid and reliable.
1. Validity
A good instrument in research has to be valid. A test is valid if it measure what  should  be  measure.
43
PEARSON  analytic  through  Ms  Excel  program  was used to know validity of the test which consists of 25 multiple choice items and
10 matching task items. Therefore 17 multiple choice items and 8 Matching task items  had  been  valid  both  of  pre-test  and  Post-test.  Each  of  test  items  reaches
above 0, 48 based on r Person Correlation table.
2.  Reliability
Beside  valid,  a  good  instrument  in  research  has  to  be  reliable.  A  test  is reliable if it is consistent and dependable. It means if the test is given to the same
students or matched students on different occasion the result of the test should be similar
44
. By using SPSS the pre- test reach Conbrach‟s Alpha 0.89 and the Post-
Test reach Conbrach‟s Alpha 0.92. It meant both of the tests were reliable.
E. Technique of Data Collection
The research technique for collecting data used was pretest and post-test:
1. Pretest
Pretest  was  given  before  treatments  are  conducted.  In  addition,  the purposes of pretest were not only to know the homogeny ability of experimental
class and controlled class but also to know students‟ basic reading comprehension.
43
Arthur Hughes, Testing for Language Teachers, New York: Cambridge, 1989, p. 22.
44
H. Douglas Brown, Language Assessment principle and classroom practices,  New York: Longman, 2004, p.  20.
2. Treatment
Treatment  was  given  to  experimental  group  by  teaching  reading descriptive  text  using  TGT  technique.  In  contrary,  researcher  thought  reading
descriptive text in controlled class without TGT technique.
3. Post-test
Post-test  was  given  both  to  experimental  and  controlled  class  in  the  last meeting.  The  purpose  of  posttest  was  to  know  the  students
‟ reading  after being taught and comprehension given treatment.
F. Technique of Data Analysis
After getting score from pre-test and post-test, the writer analysed the data by using requirement test before. It consisted of normality test and homogeny test.
1. Test Normality and Homogeneity.
Test  of  normality  in  this  research  were  conducted  through  SPSS  20 version. Normality test was used in order to know whether the distributions from
the two classes were normal or not. The test of normality was using Komogorov- Smirnov  and  Shapiro-Wilk.  Significant  score  in  Komogorov-Smirnov  and
Shapiro-Wilk table should be above 0.05 in order to have normal distributed data. In  addition,  the  homogeneity  in  this  research  were  conducted  through
SPSS  20  version  Homogeneity  test  was  used  in  order  to  know  whether  the distributions from the two classes were have the same or different variant. The test
of homogeneity was using Levine Table. Significant score in Levene table should be above 0.05 in order to have homogeny distributed data. Both of the Normality
and Homogeneity test were conducted in pre-test score and post-test Score.
2. Test of Hypothesis
In  order  to  find out  the  different  score  of  the  students‟  reading
comprehension,  the  researcher  used  pre-test  and  post-test.  After  getting  result  of Normality  and  Homogeneity  test,  t-test  conducted.  The  researcher  uses  SPSS  20
to  conduct  t-test.  t-test  was  conducted  to  test  whether  the  means  of  two  samples differ or not.