Homogeneity of Pre-Test and Post-Test

is the score of progress after classes are given the treatment. It takes from score of post-test minus score of pre-test. The result of t-test from gained score is as bellow: Table 4.9 Gained Score Group Statistics Class N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Experiment 35 11.7714 8.06986 1.36406 Control 35 3.8286 11.74605 1.98545 Table 4.10 Independent Samples Test of Gained score Levenes Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means F Sig. T Df Sig. 2- tailed Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95 Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper Equal variances assumed .286 .595 3.297 68 .002 7.94286 2.40887 3.13604 12.74968 Equal variances not assumed 3.297 60.249 .002 7.94286 2.40887 3.12481 12.76090 Based on table 4.10 sig. 2 tailed of post-test was 0.002 p = 0.002. It means that p 0.05 or p α. Moreover, the table also showed that df degree of freedom was 68. The value of with df 68 was 1.668. Then was 3.297, it means that 1.668 3.297. Therefore null hypothesis was rejected and alternative hypothesis was accepted. This result is supported the result of t-test based on post test score. In other words, the result approve that there was significant effect of using TGT on teaching reading descriptive text.

4. Effect Size Formulation

The researcher added Cohen calculation in order to know what level the effect size of the research he formulation used was: √ Mean of Group A = 70.84 Mean of Group B = 62.86 Standard Deviation of Group A = 14.51 Standard Deviation of Group B = 16.48 Pooled Standard Deviation = 15.53 = 0.51 The criteria: 0.2 = small effect size 0. 5= medium effect size 0.8 = large effect size Based on the calculation above, it can be inferred that d = 0.51. Based on criteria of Cohen calculation, the result of this research is that using TGT has medium size effect on Students‟ reading Comprehension.

C. Discussion

The study approves that using TGT is effective for teaching reading descriptive text. According to the data analysis both classes showed improvement. However improvement of controlled class is not as high as experimental class. The data above showed that mean score of pre-test in experimental class was 58.97 while in controlled class was 59.03. It means there