participation factor and factor values were applied to both the implementers and the public authorities of the target of conservation.
b. Recommendations
The recommendations are the development of the scientific aspects to the writer suggested the following:
1. Research findings indicate support for the theory of policy implementation from Jones 1994:164 the dimension organization, interpretation, and application of the conservation
effectiveness of sandalwood trees. Because of the limitations of this study, it is necessary to follow through subsequent research, that the theory of Jones 1994:164 supported by
the results of this study to be more tested again. Urgency of further research is due to the fact the study only focused on the significance of testing and measuring the effectiveness
of conservation of sandalwood trees in the district of South Central Timor SCT of the province of East Nusa Tenggara ENT.
2. This study used survey methods in the design of quantitative explanatory. To gain a deep understanding of the process of policy implementation sandalwood conservation, it
is necessary to model more comprehensive and standard so that it can explain all the dimensions of the research as a whole.
3. In the present study found other factors that influence the implementation of public policy. Therefore, it is expected to do further research in order to enrich the science
disciplines of public administration, particularly on the implementation of the policy. References
Bungin, B. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Prenada Media. Creswell, J.W. 1994. Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. UK-New
Delhi-California : Sage-Publication. Edward III, George. 1980. Implementing Public Policy, Washinton DC: Congresional
Quartely Press. Grindle, Merilee S. 1980. Politic and Policy Implementation in the Third World, , New
Jersey: Pricenton University Press. Gunawan, Rimbo. 2002. Power, Meaning, And Forest Conservation: The Dynamics of
State-Society Relation. Jones, C. O, 1984. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Third Edition.
California: Wadsworth, Inc. Mazmanian,D.A., Paul A.Sabatier. 1983. Implementation and Public Policy. London:
Scott, Foresman and Company.
POLICY TO PROMOTE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX HDI WITH CASE STUDIES OF STATE OF KERALA-INDIA, SRI LANKA AND SINGAPORE
Agi Agung Galuh Purwa
Bradford University UK,Human Resources Board of West Java Province
ABSTRACT
The conception of human development is primary to benefit people, especially to improve the quality of life Haq, 1995. There are many indicators of human development, this paper focus on the Human
Development Index which is proposed by UNDP. The index is a composite index to measure a countrys achievements in three basic aspects of human development, they are: health, education and income. Since
then, many government uses HDI to promote their development policy based on HDI indicators, especially in the condition of a dominant population have not access to the basic needs and social services by the
government. This paper particularly explores how a policy by the government affects on the progress of human
development index, especially in three countries. They are State of Kerala-India, Sri Lanka and Singapore. The finding from literature review indicates that the government which has policy based on HDI indicator
as high priorities will give direct correlation with human development progresses in their area. In this way, policy by the government is the key factor to promote and maintain human development index.
I. INTRODUCTION
