all the affairs of public administration must be in accordance with the interests of supervisor. It is not in the public interest. Pinchot Pribadi: 2008 calls it a hierarchical chain of command
subordinates and superiors can govern by means domi nating”. This led to a public bureaucracy
were oriented to the interests of supervisor and do not dare to innovate in public service. The New Public Service paradigm change accountability of public services to be multi-
faceted. One is the interest of citizens, if the paradigm is used in the public service in the region. The size of the service is run in accordance with the interests and norms that develop in society.
Zadek and Radovich 2006 stated that “the accountability should, occur, three things such as obedience, and transparency, responsiveness
”. Obedience is not just obedience to their superiors, but obedience with the norms and values that have developed in the society, norms and values that
developed it, into rules and an agreement in the public service, guidelines and instructions superiors only as a means of bridging the norms and values
developed with the state’s law. That is why local autonomy needs to be done because the norms and values that develop in society from
one region to another are different. With regional autonomy, local governments can organize local governance in accordance with the norms and values that develop in public in the region, included
in the affairs of public service.
Transparency where service policies, procedures, costs and service time should be clearly
known by the public, all of the public service must be known and accounted for its implementation to the public, and the last is responsiveness where the responsiveness of public bureaucracy to the
expectations, desires, aspirations and demands of the service user. So that the orientation of the public service is really focused on the public in line with expectations, desires, aspirations and
demands of the public, so that local government will be more responsive to run public services in accordance with the wishes of the people, so that the public service will run easily accountable to
the public.
If these three aspects such as role of government, to whom the public bureaucracy to respond, and accountability
according to the New Public Service concept are used as a paradigm of public bureaucracy especially in local government, will be easier to empowerment and
development and improve local public services. Because at its core, the society that should be the main focus in the regional government. Law No. 32 of 2004 has mandated that governance in the
region is to improve the welfare of the society, improving the quality of public services and competitiveness in the region. Then it is appropriate that the old paradigm that persists in the public
bureaucracy changed after the conception of the New Public Service that is more democratic and put the public interest above those of the group or personal interests.
III. CONCLUSION
Issues of public service during this happened because the public bureaucracy that still holds strong that the old paradigm is not at all oriented to the public interest. The implementation of Law
No. 32 of 2004 is actually a way to improve the quality of local public services. Some authority services been handed over to the local government. That means the governments relationship with
the society in the region should be closer and all public service orientation should be based on public interest.
With the concept of New Public Service that will change the paradigm of public bureaucracy, especially in the public service in the region. Public bureaucracy should no longer be
a rower in the public service in the region. Public bureaucracy should serve” the public, which
public became an orientation in public service. Governments in the region are no longer as strict government with all the procedures and rules that are created strictly. But rather to put forward the
interests of the people in the region in implementing services that been handed over to the local government.
District government should respond to the public as Citizens with rights in the wider in public service, society satisfaction should be an indicator of the public service. Accountability of
public services to the conception of New Public Service is focused on the interests of citizens, in which all public service oriented public interests and values that developed in society. So that
public services more easily accountable to the public. References
Denhardt, Janet.V, Denhardt, Robert B. 2007. The New Public Services Serving Not Steering.
M.E. Sharpe: New York Dwiyanto, Agus. 2002. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan
Kebijakan Universitas Gajah Mada: Yogyakarta 2008. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Gajah Mada
University Press: Yogyakarta . 2011. Mengembalikan Kepercayaan Publik Melalui Reformasi Birokrasi.
Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta Harmon, M.M. 1992. Responsibility as paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on
Government. London: Sage Publication
Kumorotomo, Wahyudi. 2008. Akuntabiltas Pelayanan Publik, Sketsa Pada Masa Transisi. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta
Lenvine, Charles H., et al. 1990. Public Administration: Challenges, Choices, Consequences. Illinois: Scott Foreman
Mulder. N. 1985. Pribadi dan Masyarakat Jawa. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan Pribadi, Ulung. 2008. Karakter Struktur Organisasi Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia Era
Otonomi Daerah 1999-2005 Studi di Kabupaten Sleman dan Kota Surabaya. Desertasi. Universitas Gajah Mada Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta
Ratminto, Winarsih. Atik Septi, 2012. Manajemen Pelayanan Pengembangan Model Konseptual, Penerapan Citizen’s Charter dan Standar Pelayanan Minimal. Pustaka
Pelajar: Yogyakarta Rewansyah, Asmawi. 2009. Kepemimpinan dan Manajemen Pelayan Publik. Modul Diklat pada
Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia
Setyadiharja, Rendra. 2012. Paradigma Pelayanan Publik dalam Jiwa Birokrasi Indonesia. Batam Pos,
hlm.2 Zadek, Simon. Radovich, Sasha. 2006. Governing Collaborative Governance Enhancing
Development Outcomes by Improving, Partnership Governance and Accountability. John F. Kennedy
School of Government, Harvard University. 23:5 Law No. 32 of 2004 about Regional Governance
Decree of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment Number 63 Year 2003
IMPLEMENTATION GOOD
GOVERNANCE AT
LOCAL AUTHORITHIES
Sari Kinkin S.Pd,MM IPDN, saqi_hambaliyahoo.com
Andi Ali Akbar Vela IPDN, vandiuclayahoo.co.id
ABSTRACT
Concept development and implementation of policy decisions of the government can no longer be implemented when the layers of society that there is involved either directly or indirectly. Because, people are implementers and doers of
the policies issued by the government. Therefore, public participation and implementation of the principles of good governance will be more synergy and well received. Since there is no longer a need to be covered or hidden. Besides
the efficiency and effectiveness of local governance needs to be improved with more attention to aspects of the relationship between the composition of the government and local governments, and the potential for regional
differences, opportunities and challenges of global competition by providing the broadest possible powers to the regions, along with entitlement and liabilities held unitary system of local autonomy in governing the State. With a
clear division of tasks between central and local government, the more it is also clear who is responsible for the failure of a policy. The paradigm of good governance, good governance attention to three domains that synergy between the
public sector, private, and public.In accordance with the paradigm of good governance, the governments labor relations at sekor no longer be hierarchical coordinate system from the bottom up or vice versa, but to
heterarkhis, meaning that the implementation of the activities of government with respect to the relationship of the three domains of good governance. By implementing the concept of good governance, the government sector can no
longer be a major player to make a monopoly in determining public policy. The relationship between the government, private sector, and society must be developed if the paradigm of good governance will actually be implemented.
Keywords: Good Governance, hierarchies, local governments
I. INTRODUCTION
