Interview Questionnaire Data Collection Technique

b. Interview

Another data collection technique that was used in this research was interview. The qualitative data was gained through interviewing a classroom English teacher of Eleventh Grade of Multimedia Study Program students at SMK 2 Sewon, Bantul in order to support the information about learning needs and target needs needs analysis. The teacher‟s information was used to trace the students‟ problems and students‟ needs from the teacher‟s perspectives. 2. Instruments Based on the data collection technique in this study, the instruments that were used to collect the data can be drawn as follow.

a. Questionnaire

The content of the first questionnaire, which was administered to student in the needs analysis stage, was adapted from the experts, that is, Nunan 2010, Hutchinson and Waters 1987, and Graves 2000 in order to attain construct validity of the data that was gained. In addition, the content validity of the needs analysis instrument was obtained by consulting each item of the question to the expert. This questionnaire was in the form of split-form questionnaire wherebythe eleventh graders of Multimedia Study Program were allowed to choose more than one choice in each statement while in other statements students could only choose one option. The organization of the first questionnaire is presented in the table below: Aspects Item number Objectives References ɝearners‟ identity Section A To find out the students‟ identity Graves 2000:103 Hutchinson and Waters 1987:63 ɝearners‟ goal 1 To find out the students‟ aim in learning English Graves 2000: 104 T ar ge t nee d s Necessi ties 2,3 To find out what students need in target situation Hutchinson and Waters 1987:55 Lacks 4 To find out the gap between students‟ current knowledge and required competence Hutchinson and Waters 1987:55-56 Wants 5 To find out students‟ expectation to be included in the materials Hutchinson and Waters 1987:56 L ear n in g n ee d s Inputs 6,7,8,9,1 0,11, 12,13,14 15,16,17 To find out the content should be included in designing tasks for listening, speaking, reading, and writing Nunan 2000: 47-52 Proced ures 18,19,20, 21 To find out what students should do with the input in listening, speaking, reading, and writing Nunan 2000: 52 Hutchinson and Waters 1987: 60-63 22,23,24 To find out what students should do dealing with vocabulary, pronunciation, and grammar Table 3.1: Organization of Questionnaire for Need Analysis Setting 25, 26 To find out in what situation the learning process will take place Nunan 2000: 70 Student s‟ role 27 To find out learners‟ preferred role in carrying the tasks Nunan 2000: 64-69 Teacher s‟ role 28 To find out what part the teachers should take in delivering the materials Nunan 2000: 64-69 The second questionnaire was addressed to an expert of material development in order to get evaluations and validations of the first draft of the materials. The expert was a lecture of English Language Education Program in Yogyakarta State University. In order to obtain construct validity, the expert judgment questionnaire for the material evaluation was adapted from “Instrumen Penilailan Buku Teks Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan” published by BNSP 2006. Then, the content validity was gained through consulting the coverage of content in questionnaire items to the expert.This questionnaire fell into four evaluation criteria which are organized in the table below. No Evaluation Criteria Number of item Reference 1 The appropriateness of content 1-11 BNSP 2 The appropriateness of language 12-16 BNSP 3 The appropriateness of presentation 17-29 BNSP 4 The appropriateness of layout 30-36 BNSP Table 3.2: Organization of Questionnaire for Expert Judgment

b. Interview Guideline