26
the English Language Education Study Program in Sanata Dharma University and the material developers in PURIKIDS. The first and the second group would be
the participants for the pre-design survey, whereas the third group would the participants for the post design-survey besides the first and the second group.
1. Pre-design Participants
In this part, the writer chose the first and the second groups to be the pre- design participants of the study. The first group consisted of the first level of
Junior program students. The numbers of the participants of the first group were
25 students. The writer chose the first level of Junior program students because it would be better if the respondents were from the user of the English learning
materials, and the writer would know what the students’ needs were. Moreover, the second group consisted of the English teachers of
PURIKIDS who have ever taught Junior class of PURIKIDS Yogyakarta. This group consisted of 7 teachers. The writer chose the English teachers of
PURIKIDS because they had had experience in teaching Junior class. Accordingly, they could give deeper information and opinion about the available
material that they had used to teach to the first level of Junior program students.
2. Post-design Participants
In the post-design survey, the writer chose the first, the second, and the third group as the participants. The first and the second group were the same as
the participant in the pre-design survey; they were the first level of Junior program students and the English teachers of PURIKIDS. There were 10 ten of
the first level of Junior program students and 5 five English teachers of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
PURIKIDS. The writer chose the first and the second group to be the participants again in the post-design survey because the writer required to obtain the deeper
feedback after the developed material of the first level of Junior program was presented for the user in the teaching and learning process. While, the third group
consisted of the lecturers of English Language Education Program in Sanata Dharma University and the material developers of PURIKIDS. The numbers of
the participant were 5 five participants. They were 2 two of the lecturers of the English Language Education of Sanata Dharma University and 3 three of the
material developers of PURIKIDS. The writer chose the lecturers of the English Language Education in Sanata Dharma University since they were able to give a
great deal of contribution and consideration to the developed materials since they had got a lot of experiences in teaching English and developing English learning
material to teach. Moreover, the writer chose the material developers of PURIKIDS because there were only three material developers, who were
accustomed to develop the English learning materials of PURIKDS.
C. Research Instruments
