28
1. Pre-design Questionnaires
In this stage, the writer used questionnaires as the instrument. The questionnaires were conducted for the first and second group. They were the first
level of Junior program students and the English teachers in PURIKIDS who have ever taught Junior Program. In this study, the writer used close-response items
questionnaires. According to Ary, Jacobs, and Razavieh 2002:308, the close- ended questions are “when all the possible, relevant responses to a question can be
specified and the number of possible responses is limited.” The close-response questionnaire is the questionnaire in a form of multiple choice, yes-no, and
ranking. The form of the questionnaire for the first level of Junior program students could be seen in Appendix 2 page 76. The form of the questionnaire for
the English teachers of PURIKIDS could be seen in appendix Appendix 2 page 79.
2. Pre-design Interview
The writer also used interview to collect the data deeper. The interview was used for the second group of the participants or English teacher of
PURIKIDS who have ever taught Junior program. The writer conducted the personal interview. According to Ary, Jacobs, and Razavieh 2002: 382 personal
interview was done “when the interviewer reads the questions to the respondent in a face-to-face setting and records the answer.” In interviewing the teachers, the
interview guide was the writer. The interview guideline could be seen in Appendix 4 page 81.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
3. Post-design Questionnaires
In this survey, the writer used questionnaire to obtain the feedback. The questionnaires were conducted for all of the group of participants; the first level of
Junior program students, the English teachers, the lecturers of the English
Language Education Program in Sanata Dharma University and the material developers of PURIKIDS. The questionnaires, which were conducted for the first
level of Junior program students, were close-response items questionnaires. While, the open-response item questionnaires were conducted for the second and
the third group of the participants; the English teacher of PURIKIDS, the lecturers of the English Language Education Program in Sanata Dharma University, and
the material developers of PURIKIDS. According to Ary, Jacobs, and Razavieh 2002:308 open-ended questions are used “when there are a great number of
possible answers when the researcher cannot predict all the possible answers.” The form of the questionnaires for the lecturers of the English Language
Education study program, the material developers of PURIKIDS, and the English teachers of PURIKIDS were similar. The form of the questionnaire for the first
level of Junior program students could be seen in Appendix 6 page 87 and for the teachers and the experts could be seen in Appendix 7 page 89.
D. Data Gathering Techniques
Kategori