Pre-design Survey Post-design Survey

30

1. Pre-design Survey

In this stage, the writer used questionnaires to obtain the data from the first level of Junior program students and the English teacher of PURIKIDS Yogyakarta. The close-response items of the questionnaires were distributed to the 25 of the first level of Junior program students and for the 7 English teachers of PURIKIDS Yogyakarta. The questionnaires were used to obtain the opinion about the available English learning material, which the students and the teachers had had as the material to support them in teaching and learning English in the class. In distributing the questionnaires for the first level of Junior program students, the writer asked for a help to the teacher who had Junior 1 one class. The writer distributed the questionnaires in the class and asked for help to the teacher to ask the student to fill the questionnaire 5-10 minutes before the class was over. Furthermore, the writer asked the teachers to fill the questionnaire at their free time; before or after the class outside the classroom. In order to obtain the English teachers’ opinion deeply, the writer also conducted the interview. The interview was done outside the classroom and at the teachers’ free time. The writer collected the teachers’ opinion about the goals of Junior program that they know, the students’ characteristics, the teachers and learners’ roles in the class, the teaching method that was used, the English learning materials that had been available to help the teacher in teaching and learning activities in the class, and many more related to Junior program. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 31

2. Post-design Survey

In this stage, the writer collected the data in order to obtain the feedback from the first, the second, and the third groups of participants. The writer distributed the questionnaires for the first level of Junior program students. The questionnaires that were distributed were the close-response item questionnaires. Moreover, the writer asked for help to the material developers of PURIKIDS, the English teachers of PURIKIDS, and the lecturers of the English Language Education in Sanata Dharma University to give the feedback and their opinion about the new developed material include the content, the topics, the teaching technique, and the layout of the product. The questionnaires for them were in the form of open-response item. The questionnaires for the material developers of PURIKIDS and the lecturers of the English Language Education in Sanata Dharma were distributed before the writer implemented the new developed material in Junior class. While, the questionnaires, which were distributed for the first level of Junior program students and the English teachers of PURIKIDS, were distributed after the implementation of the developed material. The mechanism was the same as in the pre-design survey. The questionnaires for the students were distributed in the class while for the teachers would be outside the class. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 32

E. Data Analysis Technique 1. Pre-design Analysis