Data Gathering and Analysis Technique

30 Figure 3.3 Questionnaire Blueprint Part B

E. Data Gathering and Analysis Technique

The data for this research was gathered using the research instrument that was a questionnaire. Students in the late year of their study were rarely found around the campus as most of them only have three courses during their late semester. Thus, distributing the questionnaire via online was preferable as the respondents would be able to access the questionnaire almost anywhere and anytime. ELESP batch 2012 students were divided into six classes from A to F. Each class had its own WhatsApp class group. To enable access to the questionnaire for all ELESP students, the link to the questionnaire was distributed via messenger WhatsApp to each class group. Following the data gathering, the researcher analysed the data. The analysis was started from part A of the questionnaire. There were 12 questions with 5 options for each question. The options were strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree. The responses of each option for each question in part A was summed up, resulting the number of respondents who chose the option. The QB Feeling QB 3 Case I II Reason QB 2 Case I II Preference QB 1 Case I II 31 percentages showed how the respondents perceived negative feedback. High percentages on agree and strongly agree choices meant that negative feedback was perceived positively. For part B of the questionnaire cases I and II, the number of responses of each option for question number one was summed and then divided by the total responses to find out the percentage of how popular the option was. The highest percentage showed the most popular option and became the preferred negative feedback. For question numbers 2 and 3 of questionnaire part B, the answers were recorded into table Appendices C and E. The responses were simplified. For example, one of the respondents wrote “Because it would give a very clear information relating to my mistake ”. In the table, it is recorded as clear. Then, the recorded data was summed up Appendices D and F. The data summary showed the most popular reason and feeling mentioned by the respondents.

F. Research Procedures

Dokumen yang terkait

A Technique Practiced By The Students Of English Department To Study English As A Foreign Language

0 36 43

Teaching English As Foreign Language To Students With Autism (A Descriptive Study Conducted At Sma Lazuardi Global Islamic School Depok)

1 26 191

GOOD ENGLISH TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS AS PERCEIVED BY THE SEVENTH SEMESTER STUDENTS Good English Teacher Characteristics As Perceived By The Seventh Semester Students Of English Education Departement, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

0 2 13

GOOD ENGLISH TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS AS PERCEIVED BY THE SEVENTH SEMESTER STUDENTS Good English Teacher Characteristics As Perceived By The Seventh Semester Students Of English Education Departement, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

0 2 14

A componential analysis on synonymous nouns used by the third semester students of English language education study program.

0 1 74

The negative impact of frequent usage of English language toward English language education study program students` official Indonesian language.

1 2 65

Strategies to process the intended meanings of English idioms by semester four students of English Language Education Study Program.

0 0 194

A study of gender language of Sanata Dharma English Language Education Study Program students using Deborah Tannen`s gender language theory.

0 0 170

Mastery of defining and non-defining relative clauses by students of the English language education study program.

1 4 140

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM EDUCATION TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION

0 1 80