Review of Related Study

21 In contrast, hedges may also reduce the strength of the feedback and make the feedback less effective. The use of hedges may reduce the power imposed on a sentence. People will react to a “Open the door” more than b “Could you please open the door?” Sentence a feels more commanding compared to b, which is more like a request. This research will use hedges in creating the options for part B of the questionnaire where the respondents should choose one as their preferred negative feedback.

7. Review of Related Study

There was a similar research that was done before this research. Restuningtyas 2010 had done a research related to how students perceive feedback. However, there are two main differences in Restuningtyas research and this research. Restuningtyas’ respondents were students of Microteaching class 20102011 and the topic was feedback. Meanwhile, in this research, the respondents were English Language Education Study Program batch 2012 students and the topic was negative feedback. The area of research was more holistic compared to Restuningtyas’ that focuses on one subject. In this research, the area was not limited to a class. The area was the feedback the students received during their study in ELESP Sanata Dharma University. Through the more holistic area, it was expected that the result of this research could represent how ELESP students perceived feedback that they had during their study in Sanata Dharma University. This research also focused on negative feedback, excluding positive feedback. 22

B. Theoretical Framework

There are two research questions in this research. The first research question is related to perception and the second is related to preference. Each respondent may have different perception and preference for negative feedback. Their perception and preference are analysed based on Brookhart’s 2008 criteria of effective feedback, directness based on Smith 1991, Ardissono, Boella, and Lesmo 1995, and the use of hedging devices based on Salager- Meyer’s taxonomy as cited by Nasiri, 2012. In answering the first research questions, the researcher uses the framework displayed in Figure 2.1. In the framework, it can be seen that for the first research question related to how the respondents perceive negative feedback. The researcher focuses on the need, motivation, and clarity of negative feedback. The focuses are represented in the questionnaire part A, which is written as QA with its respective number shown in Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1 RQ 1 Framework Research Question 1 Clarity QA 8, 11 Motivation QA 3-5 QA 9, 12 Need QA 1-2 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

Dokumen yang terkait

A Technique Practiced By The Students Of English Department To Study English As A Foreign Language

0 36 43

Teaching English As Foreign Language To Students With Autism (A Descriptive Study Conducted At Sma Lazuardi Global Islamic School Depok)

1 26 191

GOOD ENGLISH TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS AS PERCEIVED BY THE SEVENTH SEMESTER STUDENTS Good English Teacher Characteristics As Perceived By The Seventh Semester Students Of English Education Departement, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

0 2 13

GOOD ENGLISH TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS AS PERCEIVED BY THE SEVENTH SEMESTER STUDENTS Good English Teacher Characteristics As Perceived By The Seventh Semester Students Of English Education Departement, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

0 2 14

A componential analysis on synonymous nouns used by the third semester students of English language education study program.

0 1 74

The negative impact of frequent usage of English language toward English language education study program students` official Indonesian language.

1 2 65

Strategies to process the intended meanings of English idioms by semester four students of English Language Education Study Program.

0 0 194

A study of gender language of Sanata Dharma English Language Education Study Program students using Deborah Tannen`s gender language theory.

0 0 170

Mastery of defining and non-defining relative clauses by students of the English language education study program.

1 4 140

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM EDUCATION TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION

0 1 80