9. The materials used letter variations bold, italic, capital to
distinguish different level and stress on a text. 4
Mean 3.67
Table 35 shows that the mean value of presentation appropriateness of Unit 2 was 3.67. This value was in the range of 3.25
x ≤ 4 which was categorised as very good and appropriate based on the standard proposed by BSNP.
2. The Revisions of Unit 2
There were only two tasks in this unit that need revision. The first was in Task 6, in which the expert suggested that instead of focusing on simple present
tense, the materials should focus in the linguistic features of expressions of asking for favor and the responses. In Task 16, the expert advised that a sample
answer should be provided.
c. The Results of the Expert Judgment and Revision of Unit 3
1. The Results of Expert Judgment of Unit 3
There were four aspects which were evaluated in this unit. They were materials appropriateness, linguistic appropriateness, method appropriateness,
and presentation appropriateness. The mean value for Unit 3 obtained from the expert judgment was 3.67 as shown in the table below. It was within the range
of 3.25 x ≤ 4 which was categorised as very good and appropriate based on the
standard proposed by BSNP. :
Table 36: The Results of the Expert Judgment of Unit 3
1. Materials Appropriateness
3.64 2.
Linguistic Appropriateness 3.43
3. Method Appropriateness
3.75 4.
Presentation Appropriateness 3.89
Mean 3.67
The following are the elaboration of the expert judgment results for unit 3.
a Materials Appropriateness
The following table shows the results of the analysis of materials appropriateness of Unit 3.
Table 37: Materials Appropriateness of Unit 3 1. The materials were developed in accordance with the Standard of
Competence SC and Basic Competence BC for grade XI of vocational high school in the odd semester.
4
2. The materials were developed in accordance with the course grid.
4 3. The materials were developed in accordance with the
students’ needs.
4 4. The materials explored enough texts related to the lives of
students majoring in Avionics Maintenance and Repair. 3
5. The materials explained texts in detail.
3 6.
The materials provided explanation of the elements, the structures, the functions and the linguistic features clearly.
4 7. The materials taught students about how to tell personal
educational background. 4
8. Texts in the material helped students understand how to tell personal educational background.
4 9.
The materials taught students about the use of simple past tense used to tell about personal educational background.
3 10
. The materials taught students about the use of simple past tense
in writing cover letter. 3
11. The contents texts, tables, images, etc. were taken from sources
relevant to the topic . 4
Mean 3.64
Table 37 shows that the mean value of materials appropriateness of Unit 3 was 3.64. This value was in the range of 3.25
x ≤ 4 which was categorised as very good and appropriate based on the standard proposed by BSNP.
b Linguistic Appropriateness
The following table shows the results of the analysis of linguistic appropriateness of Unit 3.
