The Results of Expert Judgment of Unit 2
The following are the elaboration of the expert judgment results for unit 3.
a Materials Appropriateness
The following table shows the results of the analysis of materials appropriateness of Unit 3.
Table 37: Materials Appropriateness of Unit 3 1. The materials were developed in accordance with the Standard of
Competence SC and Basic Competence BC for grade XI of vocational high school in the odd semester.
4
2. The materials were developed in accordance with the course grid.
4 3. The materials were developed in accordance with the
students’ needs.
4 4. The materials explored enough texts related to the lives of
students majoring in Avionics Maintenance and Repair. 3
5. The materials explained texts in detail.
3 6.
The materials provided explanation of the elements, the structures, the functions and the linguistic features clearly.
4 7. The materials taught students about how to tell personal
educational background. 4
8. Texts in the material helped students understand how to tell personal educational background.
4 9.
The materials taught students about the use of simple past tense used to tell about personal educational background.
3 10
. The materials taught students about the use of simple past tense
in writing cover letter. 3
11. The contents texts, tables, images, etc. were taken from sources
relevant to the topic . 4
Mean 3.64
Table 37 shows that the mean value of materials appropriateness of Unit 3 was 3.64. This value was in the range of 3.25
x ≤ 4 which was categorised as very good and appropriate based on the standard proposed by BSNP.
b Linguistic Appropriateness
The following table shows the results of the analysis of linguistic appropriateness of Unit 3.
Table 38: Linguistic Appropriateness of Unit 3 1. The language used in the instructions was in accordance with the
level of development of students. 3
2. The language used in the explanation according to the level of cognitive development of learners.
3 3. The language used in accordance with the development of language
skills of students. 3
4. The language was presented clearly and easily understood by students.
4 5. The language was in accordance with English grammar.
4 6.
The contents presented in one unittaskparagraphsentence reflected the harmony in the delivery of ideas.
4 7.
The texts in the materials reflected the unity of ideas. 3
Mean 3.43
Table 38 shows that the mean value of linguistic appropriateness of Unit 3 was 3.43. This value was in the range of 3.25
x ≤ 4 which was categorised as
very good and appropriate based on the standard proposed by BSNP. c Method Appropriateness
The following table shows the results of the analysis of method appropriateness of Unit 3.
Table 39: Method Appropriateness of Unit 3 1.
The materials provided opening section, core activities, and reflection consistently every unit.
4 2.
The tasks were presented in a balanced manner on each unit. 4
3. In this unit, the tasks were arrangedsorted by the rules in material
development. 4
4. The tasks in the unit were presented in various ways.
3 5.
The tasks were developed to encourage interaction in English. 4
6. The tasks encouraged students to be active in the classroom.
4 7.
Materials presentation and tasks encouraged students to be active in the process of self-learning.
4 8
The materials encouraged students to recognize their success or lack in learning English.
3
Mean 3.75
Table 39 shows that the mean value of method appropriateness of Unit 3 was 3.75. This value is in the range of 3.25
x ≤ 4 which was categorised as very
good and appropriate based on the standard proposed by BSNP. d Presentation Appropriateness
The following table shows the results of the analysis of presentation appropriateness of Unit 3.
Table 40: Presentation Appropriateness of Unit 3 1.
Consistent placement of the layout elements title, introduction, illustrations at the beginning of each unit.
4 2.
The placement of elements on the page layout followed a consistent pattern.
4 3.
The texts were differentiated clearly. 4
4. The illustration was able to increase the understanding on the text
content. 4
5. The illustration has a proportional size so as to provide an
accurate picture of the object in question. 4
6. In general, the illustrations shown harmoniously in accordance
with the topic of discussion. 4
7. The material developed did not use too much different typefaces
fonts. 4
8. The materials used easily readable typeface.
3 9.
The materials used letter variations bold, italic, capital to distinguish different level and stress on a text.
4
Mean 3.89
Table 40 shows that the mean value of presentation appropriateness of Unit 3 was 3.89. This value was in the range of 3.25
x ≤ 4 which was categorised as very good and appropriate based on the standard proposed by BSNP.