Significance of the Research
9
to Grice ‟s maxims. Among these are Leech, 1983:132 tact,
generosity, approbation, modesty, agreement, and sympathy. These maxims vary from culture to culture. What may be considered polite in one culture may be
strange or downright rude in another. From the explanations above, it can be said that being polite means paying
attention to other s‟ feeling. This could be gained by being friendly or respecting
them. This will avoid us insulting or threatening someon e‟s feeling. Hence, it is
indeed expected that when we engage in a conversation, we should present more positive concern toward people we are talking to rather than the negative one in
order to maintain successful and meaningful interaction. Face is the
“public self-image that a person wants for himself Brown and Levinson, 1987: 61-62. They define positive face two ways: as
“the want of every member that his wants be desirable to at least some others, or
alternately, “the positive consistent self-image or „personality‟ crucially
including the desire that this self-image be appreciated and approved of claimed by participants. Negative face is defined as
“the want of every „competent adult member‟ that his actions be unimpeded by others”, or “the
basic claim to territories, personal preserves, rights to non-distraction--i.e. the freedom of action and freedom from imposition
”. Further, Brown characterizes positive face by desires to be liked, admired,
ratified, and related to positively, nothing that one would threaten positive face by ignoring someone. At the same time, he characterizes negative face by the
desire not to be imposed upon, noting that negative face can be impinged upon
10
by imposing on someone. Positive Face refers to ones self-esteem, while negative face refers to ones freedom to act. The two aspects of face are the basic
wants in any social interaction, and so during any social interaction. Brown and Levinson 1987:61 state that positive and negative faces exist
universally in human culture. In social interactions, face-threatening acts are at times inevitable based on the terms of the conversation. A face threatening act is
an act that inherently damages the face of the addressee or the speaker by acting in opposition to the wants and desires of the other. Most of these acts are verbal,
however, they can also be conveyed in the characteristics of speech such as tone, inflection, etc or in non-verbal forms of communication. The threats to negative
face might take the forms of orders, requests, suggestions, and advice. They potentially damage an individual
‟s autonomy. In contrast, disapproval, disagreement, accusation, and interruptions are threats to positive face, which
potentially lower an individual ‟s self and social esteem. To lessen the threats and
save face, people need politeness. It arises as a strategy speakers need to know in order to fight against face threatening acts and guarantee safety in conversation.