Data Description Research Findings

much additional information about recount text. 3 To know the students’ perception about peer feedback through FB. a. Student 1 thought that peer feedback was really good because it told the mistakes that they had made and the excellence of their writing. Student 2 and 3 said that they did not really like to give comment to others. b. Peer feedback developed their writing skill because they could correct their writing into the right form stated student 1 and 2 while student 3 stated it did not influence his writing skill. c. They all said it was beneficial in developing critical thinking, learner autonomy and social interaction among students even though the student 3 did not feel the effect. From the result of interview above, the highest and middle score student student 1 and 2 gave the positive response to the treatment but the lowest score student student 3 gave the negative response although he admitted the benefit of peer feedback through Facebook. It can be concluded that the advantages of using Facebook as a media in writing and doing peer feedback through Facebook was beneficial for them. b The Data of Controlled Class In the following table is the score of pre-test and post-test in controlled class. Table 4.3 The Test Result of Controlled Class Students Pre-test Post-test Gained Score 1 63 66 3 2 60 70 10 3 50 63 13 4 70 76 6 5 50 76 26 6 76 93 17 7 56 70 14 8 86 96 10 9 46 73 27 10 73 86 13 11 83 90 7 12 73 76 3 13 86 96 10 14 83 96 13 15 66 76 10 16 40 56 16 17 80 80 18 80 83 3 19 73 83 10 20 46 70 24 21 60 70 10 22 60 76 16 23 66 80 14 24 73 76 3 25 53 66 13 Ʃ 1652 1943 291 Mean 66

77.7 11.6

The table 4.2 above informs that the mean score of pre-test in control class was 66, while the mean score of post-test here is 77.7. The total gained score was 291.

2. Data Analysis

Based on pre-test and post-test result scores of both experimental and controlled classes, the writer used statistic calculation of the t-test formula with the degree of significance 5 in analyzing the data to know the significant effectiveness of using Social Networking Site to students’ recount writing. First, the writer determined the mean of X experimental class and Y controlled class. To determine the mean of X by using this formula: M 1 = = = 16.68 Meanwhile, the writer also determined the mean of Y or controlled class by using the following formula: M 2 = = = 11.64 To make it clearer, the writer provided the table to show the result of mean of experimental and controlled class as following: Table 4.4 Standard Deviation Table Students X Y x X-M 1 y Y-M 2 x 2 y 2 1 33 3 16.32 -8.64 266.34 74.64 2 30 10 13.32 -1.64 177.42 2.68 3 6 13 -10.68 1.36 114.06 1.84 4 20 6 3.32 -5.64 11.02 31.80 5 36 26 19.32 14.36 373.26 206.20 6 6 17 -10.68 5.36 114.06 28.72 7 7 14 -9.68 2.36 93.70 5.56 8 17 10 0.32 -1.64 0.10 2.68 9 20 27 3.32 15.36 11.02 235.92 10 33 13 16.32 1.36 266.34 1.84 11 20 7 3.32 -4.64 11.02 21.52 12 16 3 -0.68 -8.64 0.46 74.64 13 20 10 3.32 -1.64 11.02 2.68 14 7 13 -9.68 1.36 93.70 1.84 15 13 10 -3.68 -1.64 13.54 2.68 16 13 16 -3.68 4.36 13.54 19.00 17 4 -12.68 -11.64 160.78 135.48 18 16 3 -0.68 -8.64 0.46 74.64 19 7 10 -9.68 -1.64 93.70 2.68 20 3 24 -13.68 12.36 187.14 152.76 21 13 10 -3.68 -1.64 13.54 2.68 22 7 16 -9.68 4.36 93.70 19.00 23 16 14 -0.68 2.36 0.46 5.56 24 24 3 7.32 -8.64 53.58 74.64 25 30 13 13.32 1.36 177.42 1.84 ƩX= 417 ƩY= 291 Ʃx= 0 Ʃy= 0 Ʃx 2 = 2351.38 Ʃy 2 = 1183.52 After determining the mean of both experimental X and controlled class Y, the writer determined the Standard Deviation of experimental class by using a formula as follows: SD 1 = √ = √ = √ = 9.69 To determine the Standard Deviation of controlled class Y used this formula: SD 2 = √ = √ = √ = 6.88 Next, after knowing the result of both Standard Deviation X and Y, the writer calculated the Standard Error Mean of experimental class X by using the formula below: SE = √ = √ = 1.97 Meanwhile, the formulation below was used to determine the Standard Error Mean of controlled class Y: SE = √ = √ = 1.40 Then, the writer calculated the difference of standard error between mean of experimental class X and mean of controlled class Y by using this formula: SE - = √ = √ = √ = 1.83 The next step is determining t observed: t o = – = = = 2.75 Finally, the writer calculated t table t t in significance level of 5 with degree of freedom df: df = N 1 + N 2 - 2 = 25+25 – 2 = 48

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effect of Using Diary on the Eight Grade Students‟ Achievement in Writing a Recount Text at SMPN 2 Bangil;

0 3 16

The Effectiveness of Dictogloss Technique in Teaching Writing of Narrative Text

2 27 156

The Effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Teaching the Simple Past Tense (An Experimental Study at the Second Grade Students of SMK Bintang Nusantara, Tangerang Selatan)

0 5 97

The Effectiveness of pictures towards Students' Writing Skill of Descriptive Text ( A Quasi-experimental Study at Tenth Grade of SMK Islamiyah Ciputat)

0 13 86

An Analysis of Students' Error in Writing Recount Text (A Case Study in the Second Grade Students of SMP Trimulia Jakarta))

16 39 151

The Effectiveness of Using Picture in Teaching Reading of Procedure Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Third Grade of SMK YAPIMDA Jakarta)

1 8 114

Grammatical Errors on Students' Writing of Recount Text (An Error Analysis at the Second Grade Students of SMP Dharma Karya UT Pamulang)

1 11 80

The Effectiveness of Using Clustering Technique in Teaching Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Grade ofMts Negeri 3 Jakarta)

1 11 109

The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method towards Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan year 2015/2016)

0 3 72

The Effectiveness of Teaching Verbs by Using Cooperative Learning (A-Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Year Students of SMPN 169 Jakarta)

0 4 158