The Problems of the Study

3. This study will be relevant used by the learners to improve their ability to understand and produce discourse which are effective in conveying informations in order to make the learners become mastery in analyzing interpersonal metaphor in any discourse. References Bloor, T M, Bloor. 1995. The Functional Analysis of Language. New York: Oxford University Press. Bogdan, C. R. Biklen, S. K. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education. United State of America: Allyn and Bacon. Chang, Chenguang. 2001. The Rebuilding of Grammatical Metaphor and Experience. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 1. Collerson, J. 1994. English Grammar: A Functional Approach. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association. Dong, Jiezhen. 2013. Interpersonal Metaphor in Legal Discourse: Modality in Cross Examination. Eggins, Suzanne. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Printer Press. Fan, Wenfang. 1999. Cohesive Functions of Nominalization in English Discourse. Journal of Foreign Language Study. Vol. 11. Fan, Wenfang. 2000. English Metaphors of Mood. Journal of Foreign Languages. No. 4. Gerot, I P, Wignell. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabler. Givon, T. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company Gerald, Erichsen. 2005. Euphemism. Retrieved from http:spanish.about.comoldspanishvocabularygeuphemism_g Grube G.M.A. 1983. Aristotle：On Poetry and Style. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill Educational Publishing. Hadidi, Yaser. 2012. A Comparative Study of Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in Business and Political Texts . Iran: Tabriz State University. Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Halliday, M. A. K Hasan, Rumania. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspect of Language in A School Semiotic Perspective. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.