Data Description RESEARCH FINDING

25 57 63 6 26 65 68 3 27 64 71 7 28 48 62 14 29 58 63 5 30 72 76 4 31 66 71 5 32 69 78 9 ∑ � = 2019 ∑ � = 2242 ∑ � = 218 �� = 63.09 �� = 70.06 �� = 6.81 From the table of experiment and control class’ pre-test and post-test result, we can conclude that there is significant effect of using guided question in experimental class. The average of pre-test in control class and the average of pre-test in experimental class have not much difference which experiment is 65,13 and control class is 63,09. It shows that there is not much difference in students’ understanding about narrative writing at the beginning. They almost have same basic ability about it. Then, in the post-test, the average in experiment class is increase significantly, which is 86,19. The lowest score of experiment class in pre-test is 48 when the highest score is 78. The lowest score of experimental class in post- test is 72 when the highest score is 98. Comparing with experiment class, control class which did not give any treatment, the average score of post-test is 70,06. The lowest score of control class in pre-test is 48 when the highest score is 78. The lowest score of control class in post-test is 51 when the highest score is 80. Then, by seeing the KKM 75 in both classes, the experiment class has more students who get higher than KKM compared with controlled class. Tabel 4.3 The comparision of Experiment and Control Class Students x y X Y X 2 Y 2 1 21 7 -0.06 0.19 0.00 0.04 2 22 7 0.94 0.19 0.88 0.04 3 19 2 -2.06 -4.81 4.25 23.16 4 12 2 -9.06 -4.81 82.13 23.16 5 45 8 23.94 1.19 573.00 1.41 6 7 6 -14.06 -0.81 197.75 0.66 7 37 6 15.94 -0.81 254.00 0.66 8 22 6 0.94 -0.81 0.88 0.66 9 25 4 3.94 -2.81 15.50 7.91 10 17 10 -4.06 3.19 16.50 10.16 11 21 15 -0.06 8.19 0.00 67.04 12 25 5 3.94 -1.81 15.50 3.29 13 39 11 17.94 4.19 321.75 17.54 14 23 1 1.94 -5.81 3.75 33.79 15 19 13 -2.06 6.19 4.25 38.29 16 21 14 -0.06 7.19 0.00 51.66 17 25 10 3.94 3.19 15.50 10.16 18 20 11 -1.06 4.19 1.13 17.54 19 8 5 -13.06 -1.81 170.63 3.29 20 8 14 -13.06 7.19 170.63 51.66 21 46 5 24.94 -1.81 621.88 3.29 22 5 1 -16.06 -5.81 258.00 33.79 23 15 1 -6.06 -5.81 36.75 33.79 24 7 1 -14.06 -5.81 197.75 33.79 25 24 6 2.94 -0.81 8.63 0.66 26 18 3 -3.06 -3.81 9.38 14.54 27 22 7 0.94 0.19 0.88 0.04 28 20 14 -1.06 7.19 1.13 51.66 29 32 5 10.94 -1.81 119.63 3.29 30 5 4 -16.06 -2.81 258.00 7.91 31 30 5 8.94 -1.81 79.88 3.29 32 14 9 -7.06 2.19 49.88 4.79 ∑ � = 674 ∑ � = 218 ∑ � = 0 ∑ � = 0 ∑ �� =3489.88 ∑ �� = 552.88 �� =21.06 �� =6.81 Comparing gain value in table above, experiment class got higher gain value, it is between 5 to 46 where in control class got gain value between 1 to 15. The average data of gain value of experiment class also higher than in control class, where in experiment class got 21,06 and in control class got 6,81.

B. Normality of the Data

Before analyzing the data, to prove the hypothesis and interpreting the data, the writer had to analyze the normality of the data. This analysis is used to see whether the data of the research has been normally distributed or not. When it is normally distributed, it means the data is normal and can represent the population. Because of the object of this study belongs to little sample, it is recomended using Lillyfors. In this formula, the data was transformed into the basic value. The maximum dispute T got from the calculation must be in absolute value +. The result of normality can be seen by comparing the value of T max to T table. 1. Normality of pre-test in Experiment Class Hypotheses H o = Data of X is normally distributed H 1 = Data of X is not normally distributed Criteria of the test: In the significant degree of 0,05, the value in the table of Lilyfors shows: T 0,0532 = 0, 157 H = T 0,157 H 1 = T 0,157 The result showed that T max T table 0,152 0,157, it means that the data is normally distributed. Table 4.4 Calculation of Pre-test Normality in Experimental Class xi f fx x2 fx2 p=fn z=xi-Ms Φ Σp T=Φ-Σp 47 1 47 2209 2209 0.03 -1.666 0.048 0.031 0.017 48 3 144 2304 6912 0.09 -1.564 0.059 0.125 -0.066 49 1 49 2401 2401 0.03 -1.462 0.072 0.156 -0.084 50 1 50 2500 2500 0.03 -1.360 0.087 0.188 -0.101 52 1 52 2704 2704 0.03 -1.156 0.124 0.219 -0.095 55 1 55 3025 3025 0.03 -0.850 0.198 0.250 -0.052 61 1 61 3721 3721 0.03 -0.238 0.406 0.281 0.125 64 1 64 4096 4096 0.03 0.068 0.527 0.313 0.152 66 2 132 4356 8712 0.06 0.272 0.607 0.375 0.132 67 3 201 4489 13467 0.09 0.374 0.646 0.469 0.117 68 1 68 4624 4624 0.03 0.476 0.683 0.500 0.113 70 4 280 4900 19600 0.13 0.680 0.752 0.625 0.111 71 2 142 5041 10082 0.06 0.782 0.783 0.688 0.095 72 1 72 5184 5184 0.03 0.884 0.812 0.719 0.093 73 5 365 5329 26645 0.16 0.986 0.838 0.719 0.119 74 1 74 5476 5476 0.03 1.088 0.862 0.906 -0.045 75 2 150 5625 11250 0.06 1.190 0.883 0.969 -0.086 78 1 78 6084 6084 0.03 1.496 0.933 1 -0.067 1140 32 2084 74068 138692 1 0.152 63.333 115.778 4114.889 7705.111 � 2 = ∑ �� 2 � − � ∑ �� � � 2 = 138692 32 − � 2084 32 � 2 = 4334.1 − [65,1] 2 = 4334.1 − 4238.01 = 96.09 = √96.09 = 9.8 S = 9.8 S 2 = 96.09 M = 63.3 T max = 0.152 T table = 0.157 2. Normality of post-test in Experiment Class Hypotheses H o = Data of X is normally distributed H 1 = Data of X is not normally distributed Criteria of the test: In the significant degree of 0,05, the value in the table of Lilyfors shows: T 0,0532 = 0, 157 H = T 0,157 H 1 = T 0,157 The result showed that T max T table 0,091 0,157, it means that the data is normally distributed. Table 4.5 Calculation of Post-test Normality in Experimental Class xi f fx x2 fx2 p=fn z=xi-Ms Φ Σp T=Φ-Σp 72 2 144 5184 10368 0.063 -1.843 0.033 0.063 -0.030 73 2 146 5329 10658 0.063 -1.707 0.044 0.125 0.081 74 1 74 5476 5476 0.031 -1.572 0.058 0.156 -0.098 77 1 77 5929 5929 0.031 -1.167 0.122 0.188 0.066 79 1 79 6241 6241 0.031 -0.896 0.185 0.219 -0.034 81 1 81 6561 6561 0.031 -0.626 0.266 0.250 -0.016 82 1 82 6724 6724 0.031 -0.491 0.312 0.281 0.031 83 1 83 6889 6889 0.031 -0.356 0.361 0.313 -0.049 85 2 170 7225 14450 0.063 -0.085 0.466 0.375 0.091 87 3 261 7569 22707 0.094 0.185 0.573 0.469 -0.105 88 3 264 7744 23232 0.094 0.320 0.626 0.563 0.063 89 2 178 7921 15842 0.063 0.455 0.676 0.625 -0.051 90 1 90 8100 8100 0.031 0.590 0.723 0.656 0.066 91 2 182 8281 16562 0.063 0.726 0.766 0.719 -0.047 93 2 186 8649 17298 0.063 0.996 0.840 0.781 0.059 94 2 188 8836 17672 0.063 1.131 0.871 0.844 -0.027 95 2 190 9025 18050 0.063 1.266 0.897 0.906 -0.009

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of small group discussion on students' speaking skill A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of MTs. Darul Ma'arif Jakarta

0 3 89

The effectiveness of using games towards students' vocabulary mastery: a quasi-experimental study at the eighth grade students' of SMP Darussalam, Pondok Labu, Jakarta.

0 10 98

The effectiveness of picture sequence in teaching narrative text writing: a quasi experimental study at the eighth grade students of SMP Islam Al Syukro Universal Ciputat

0 4 90

The effectiveness of using jigsaw technique in teaching narrative text (an experimental study of the second grade students of MTs Pembangunan Nurul Islam – Tangerang Selatan)

0 8 0

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PICTURE BOOKS IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP PGRI Ciputat)

1 18 147

The effectiveness of using pictures in teaching narrative text : an experimental study of eighth grade students of Nusantara Plus Junior High School Ciputat

1 13 77

The Effectiveness of Using Inductive Technique in Teaching Degrees of Comparison (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP IT Cordova)

1 6 88

The Effectiveness of Question Generation Strategy on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Tambun Selatan)

1 10 143

The Effectiveness of Guided Question Technique on Students' Writing Skill of Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of MTs. Negeri 13 Jakarta)

0 3 129

The Effectiveness of Using Story Mapping Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 127 Jakarta)

0 12 159