20
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY
This chapter describes the methodology of this research. Furthermore, this chapter is  divided  into  six  parts  namely  research  method,  research  setting,  research
participants, research instrument, data analysis techniques and research procedure.
A. Research Method
The  researcher  used  mixed  methods  in  this  research.  According  to  Ary, Jacobs,  and  Razavieh
2002,  “Mixed  methods  research  combines  quantitative  and qualitative research methods in different ways, with each approach adding something
to  the  understanding  of  the  phenomenon.”  There  were  three  reasons  why  the researcher  used  mixed  methods  in  this  research.  The  first  reason  was  that  if  the
researcher  used  only  one  method,  the  detailed  findings  might  not  appear.  Mixed method  research  can  also  provide  stronger  evidence  for  conclusion  through
corroboration  of  findings.  The  combination  of  qualitative  and  quantitative  research method  may  help  the  researcher  finding  more  complete  understandings  of  a
phenomenon Ary et al., 2002. The researcher used both methods to complement the results  of  the  research.  The  second  reason  was  that  the  researcher  could  clarify  the
finding in the second phase from the first phase which was called as complementary PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21 purpose. In this case, the findings of first phase were from the questionnaire and the
findings of the second phase were from interview Ary et al., 2002. The third reason was by using mixed method, the researcher can develop the finding from one phase to
the  second  phase.  Ary  et  al  2002  states, “developments  uses  result  from  one
approach to develop or inform the other approach ”. In this case, the researcher could
develop  the  data  that  were  gathered  from  the  questionnaire  by  conducting  the interview.
There are six method designs in mixed methods research. The researcher used sequential  design  for  this  research.  The  researcher  chose  sequential  design  because
the  data  or  findings  are  collected  in  two  phases  by  distributing  questionnaire  and conducting  interview  in  different  time.  The  sequence  was  quantitative  findings
collection first and then followed by qualitative findings collection Ary et al., 2002. The researcher used questionnaire and interview as the research instrument to
obtain the data in this research. First, she distributed the questionnaire sheets and then conducted  an  interview  as  a  follow  up  of  the  questionnaire.  The  questionnaire  was
used  to  frame  the  answer  to  the  first  research  question  which  is  about  the students’
problems of speaking during PPL. The interview was used to clarify the answer to the first  research  question  and  to  seek  the  detailed  information  as  the  answer  to  the
second  research  question.  In  addition,  the  researcher  used  percentage  for  the  data gathered from the questionnaire in order to strengthen the data related to the research
questions, but the researcher still used qualitative research method as the dominance in her research.
22
B. Research Setting
This  research  was  conducted  in  the  end  of  the  semester,  academic  year 20152016. It took place at the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata
Dharma  University.  The  researcher  distributed  the  questionnaire  on  December,  14
th
2015  at  the  library  of  Sanata  Dharma  University  in  Mrican.  The  interview  was conducted on December, 15
th
-16
th
, 2015 in the same place.
C. Research Participants
The  participants  of  this  research  were  the  ELESP  students  of  semester  seven batch 2012 who had taken PPL. There were five students as the participants for this
research.  Those  five  participants  came  from  different  schools  where  they  did  their PPL.  They  involved  in  answering  the  questionnaire  and  the  interview.  From  the
beginning,  the  researcher  chose  five  participants  for  this  research.  The  researcher used non-proportional quota sampling in this research. Trochim 2006 states:
Non-proportional  quota  sampling  is  a  bit less  restrictive.  In  this  method, you can specify the minimum number of sampled units you want in each category.
You are not concerned with having numbers that match the proportions in the population. Instead, you simply want to have enough to assure that you will be
able to talk about even small groups in the population.
There is a reason why the researcher used non-proportional quota sampling in this  research.  The  reason  was  because  those  five  participants  taught  English  as
practice  teachers  in  different  schools  with  different  characteristics  of  the  students. Yet, the participants definitely had experiences in facing the students’  problems of