2. Based on the data analysis, there are 12 ways of doing dispreferred
social act on the second pair part which are applied in the conversation which is uttered by the main character in Beauty and the Briefcase.
Those phenomena have a different frequency of occurences in a conversation between the main character and the other characters.
Those ways indicate that those characters of Beauty and the Briefcase are doing dispreferred social act on the second pair part in a
conversation. 3.
Social factors influence people to do dispreferred social act on the second pair part. In this research, there are 4 social factors which
influence the main character and the other characters in Beauty and the Briefcase movie to do dispreferred act on the second pair part in
their conversation. Those social factors are: the social context of the interaction, the function of speaking, the participants, and the topic of
conversation.
B. Suggestions
Paying attention towards the conclusions that are derivied, the researcher proposed some suggestions for some parties. They are as
follows. 1. Readers
This research suggested to the readers, particularly for those who come from the English Department, to learn deeper the use of dispreferred
social act on the second pair part in society, since this study is under the umbrella of sociolinguistics approach which is commonly found in
daily life. By studying it, the readers are expected to get more knowledge on the use of dispreferred social act on the second pair part
in socety and also some social factors which influence people to do dispreferred social act in their daily conversation.
2. Future Researchers The future researchers may also conduct research on dispreferred
social act on the second pair part. For instance they can analyze the influence of gender in the use of dispreferred social act on the second
pair, particularly in woman language. Therefore, a new research and theory are needed in order to get a deeper investigation in the similar
fields.
80
REFERENCES
A. Printed Sources
Aronoff, Mark and Rees Miller. 2003. The Handbook of Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: London.
Atkinson, Maxwell and John Heritage. 1984. Structures of Social Action. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Chaika, Elaine. 1982. Language the Social Mirror. Newburry House Publisher, Inc: Massachussetts.
Crystal, David. 1985. Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: UK.
Finch, Geoffrey. 2000. Linguistics Terms and Concepts. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
Hornby, Albert. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford University Press: UK.
Hudson, Rudolph. 1996. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Hutchby, Ian and Robbin Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation Analysis. Polity Press: UK.
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundation of Sociolinguistics: An Ethnography Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Liddicoat, Anthony. 2007. An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. Continuum: London.
Malmkjaer, Kristen. 2006. Linguistics and the Language of Translation. Edinburgh University Press: UK.
Moleong, Lexy. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
