CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
After carrying out the experiment and the result of the students’ pre- test and post-test in the second year students of “SMK Islamiyah Ciputat –
Tangerang”, the writer found that the students who were taught by using Communicative Approach got the higher result than the students who were
taught by using Audio-Lingual Method. The average of the result of using
Communicative Approach is 7.60 and Audio Lingual Method is 6.55.
The result of the analysis of the research shows the value of t
o
t observation = 3.38. It is higher than the value t
t
t table of the significance 5 and 1 is 2.02 and 2.71. It can be interpreted that there is significant
difference between teaching Passive Voice of Present Progressive Tense by using Communicative Approach and Audio-Lingual Method.
B. Suggestion
The writer’s suggestion indicates for the teacher to consider another method of teaching that is used in teaching English. It is proven by the writer
that Communicative Approach affects the significant result than Audio- Lingual Method in teaching, especially, Passive Voice of Present Progressive
Tense. Communicative Approach, here, is the experimental method applied by the writer and Audio-Lingual Method is the method which is usually
employed by the teacher. In this case, the writer also recommends to the teacher to try and examine Communicative Approach to be implemented in
teaching another English material.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Biber, Douglas., et al., Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. 1999.
B. Dagut, Menachem. “A Teaching Grammar of the Passive Voice in English”, in Bertil Malmberg and Gerhard Nickel eds., International Review of
Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Hemsbach: Beltz Offsetdruck. 1985.
Canale, Michael, and Merrill Swain, Approaches to Communicative Competence, occasional papers no. 14. 30 Orange Grove Road: Seameo Regional
Language Centre. 1980. Celce-Murcia, Marianne. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language,
second edition. Boston: Heinle Heinle Publishers. 1991. Celce-Murcia, Marianne and Sharon Hilles. Techniques and Resources in
Teaching Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1988. C. Richards, Jack, and Theodore S. Rodgers. Approaches and Methods in
Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1986. E. Warriner, John. English Grammar and Composition. New York: Harcout Brain
Jovanovich Publisher. 1982. Farkhan, Muhammad. An Introduction to Linguistic. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press.
2006. Frank, Marcella. Modern English; a practical reference guide. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall. 1972. _____. Modern English; part I. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 1972.
F. Mackey, William. Language Teaching Analysis. London: Longman. 1966. Graver, B. D. Advanced English Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.
Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching, third edition.
Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited. 2001. Kameen, Patrick. “The Passive Voice: it must be spoken for”, in John F. Haskel
ed., TESOL NEWSLETTER. Illinois: Pantagraph Printing. 1983.
K. Werner, Patricia., et al., Interactions 2 Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2002.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1986.
Littlewood, William. Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
Mihailovic, Ljiljana. “Some Observations on the Use of the Passive Voice”, in W. L. Darley ed., English Language Teaching, vol. XVII No. 2. Plaistow:
Oxford University Press 1963. Moon, Rosamund., et al., Cobuild Student’s Dictionary and Grammar. London:
HarperCollins Publishers Ltd., 1994. Parrot, Martin. Grammar for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. 2000. Schrampfer Azar, Betty. Understanding and Using English Grammar, second
edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 1989. Sudijono, Anas. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo
Persada. 2005. Swan, Michael. Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1983.
Thornbury, Scott. How to Teach Grammar. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education
Limited. 1999. Ur, Penny. Grammar Practice Activities; a Practical Guide for Teachers.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992. _____. A Course in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1996. http:www.englishraven.commethod_audioling.html Friday, 3rd of August
2007: 19.30. http:www.freewebs.comdzchunUnit202.htm Friday, 3rd of August 2007:
19.30. http:www.monografias.comtrabajos18the-communicative-approachthe-
communicative-approach.shtml Friday, 3rd of August 2007: 19.30. http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiAudio-Lingual_Method Friday, 3rd of August 2007:
19.30.
http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiCommunicative_competence Friday, 3rd of August 2007: 19.30.
http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiCommunicative_language_teaching Friday, 3rd of August 2007: 19.30.
http:www.sil.orglingualinksLANGUAGELEARNINGWaysToApproachLang uageLearningTheAudioLingualMethod.htm Friday, 3rd of August 2007:
19.30.
Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran
Experiment Class Mata Pelajaran
: Bahasa Inggris KelasSemester
: XI4 Pertemuan Ke-
: 1 Alokasi Waktu
: 2 x 45 menit Standar Kompetensi : 2. Memahami makna dalam wacana lisan interpersonal
dan transaksional, secara formal maupun informal, dalam bentuk mendengarkan permintaan dan perintah yang
berkaitan dengan pekerjaan.
Kompetensi Dasar : 2.1 Memahami percakapan sederhana sehari-hari baik
dalam konteks profesional maupun pribadi dengan orang bukan penutur asli.
Indikator : Pertanyaan dengan pola question tags dan questions words
dalam konteks kegiatan sehari-hari diperagakan dan dijawab dengan benar.
I. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran siswa dapat: • Merespon ungkapanpercakapan mengenai; question tags dan
questions with question words • Meminta dan memberi informasi
• Menggunakan kosa kata baru II.
Materi Ajar • Percakapan-percakapan sederhana yang memuat ungkapan-ungkapan
berikut: Question tags
A: Is your ruler being used? B: No, it isn’t.
