Conclusions CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

65 study can also be used in linguistics and pragmatics class since linguistic forms and the implicature are studied in the class. Besides, they can also learn on how to make a good and correct interesting slogan by paying attention on the linguistic forms and implicature meanings in the slogan.

3. Future Researchers

The researcher considers the limitation of this research and the fact that the research in a pragmatic approach has been widely done. Hopefully, other researchers will develop it further. This research can be a help for researchers that have similar topic and aspect. The next researcher who used implicature as the topic for study can used the same or different sources and theories to give more valid result. The future researcher may analyze other types of advertisements such as radio advertisement. They also may analyze other types of slogan such as car product, food product or others. They can make use of the same theories to analyze other types of advertisements and slogans of different products and brands. There are many experts who propose the theories of pragmatics and advertisements language which can be used to examine any kind of advertisement. The researcher encourages future researchers to conduct a deeper study about the advertisement. The future researcher can also do the study about other field such as semantics or stylistics. They may freely choose the types of advertisements whether they will analyze a spoken advertisement or a written advertisement. Hopefully, this recommendation can improve the study of the English language. REFERENCES Abdul, A. 2004. Analisis wacana: Sebuah kajian bahasa dalam pemakaian. Malang: Bayumedia Publisher. Arens, W. F. 2006. Contemporary advertising 10 th ed.. New York: McGraw Hill Irwin. Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Razavieh, A. 2002. Introduction to research in education 6 th ed.. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Sorensen, C., Razavieh, A. 2010. Introduction to research in education 8 th ed.. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Austin, J. L. 1989. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brown, J. D. 1998. The advertising language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cook, G. 1998. The discourse of advertising. New York: Routledge. Goddard, A. 1998. The language of advertising. New York: Routledge. Granat, J. 2003. Persuasive advertising for entrepreneurs and small business owners . Jakarta: Kencana. Grice, H.P. 1983. Pragmatics implicature study: Logic and conversation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In . K. Denzin Y. S. Lincoln Eds. Handbook of qualitative research pp. 105-117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Leech, G. N. 1983. English in advertising: A linguistics study of advertising in gre at. New York: Longman. Leech, G. N. 1992. The principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Limited. Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 66