Data Analysis Technique THESIS ANISA ARIFIYANI

formal class. It occurs when the teacher makes something funny and new in English class. She uses an unique technique in reading poem activity. The students can enjoy and they can express their feeling and emotional during the process of learning. It can be impressed that not all formal class has awkward atmosphere. The second dissimilarity is several features like interruption, overlap, and topic change are not found in non-formal class but those features can be found in formal class. The appearance of interruption and overlap in the conversations of formal class occur unintentionally. Interruption occurs when the teachers is explaining materials, the students interrupt the teacher‟s utterances. It occurs because the teacher takes a long time in delivering the materials and makes the students impatiently interrupt him. Actually, this interruption has negative implication because the current speaker has not already finished hisher utterances and the next speaker cuts and interrupts herhim. Silencepause is more often found in formal class because almost the students are passive in the learning process. If the teacher gives an explanation or a question, they do not directly answer the teacher‟s question. The other difference appears on adjacency pair. Adjacency pair represented by calling - answer has difference between both classes. Calling – answering mostly found in the conversations of non-formal class, but it appears only several pair utterances in the conversations of formal class. This difference numbers are caused by some factor. The tutor as the student‟s senior know more the students‟ name in non-formal class, while the teacher does not know all the students‟ name in formal class. Turn taking system which has typical pattern A-B-A-B-A-B requires the speaker to know the time when she speaks. The speaker cannot start talking anytime he wants to. It needs a special place of speaker change or place where the speaker transition becomes relevant. Therefore, it should be described in terms of two mechanisms namely Turn Constructional Unit TCU and Turn Allocation Unit TAU. In TCU, speaker may construct a turn in various units; include lexical item, phrase, and sentence. Meanwhile in TAU, it is distributed into two groups namely selecting the next speaker and self selection. The turn taking mechanisms have similarities and dissimilarities in both classes. The similarity lies when the participants in both classes select the next speaker by using an ellipsis technique. Ellipsis technique is mostly found in the conversation of both classes produced by the participants through WH question or rising intonation. This technique is more often used by the tutorthe teacher in selecting the next speaker. The tutorthe teacher uses WH question in asking or offering the students to do something and herhis utterances also signaled by rising intonation. Besides the similarities which have been explained, the dissimilarities appear on each unit. First, lexical item and phrase that considered as TCU in both classes has significance different. It is caused by the different model of learning in both classes. The model of learning in non-formal class emphasizes on how the students master vocabulary and how the students speak actively in the class.