Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas variabel Audit Operasional Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas variabel Pengendalian Internal

2. Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas variabel Audit Operasional

Correlations Jumlah VAR00001 Pearson Correlation .476 Sig. 2-tailed .008 N 30 VAR00002 Pearson Correlation .412 Sig. 2-tailed .024 N 30 VAR00003 Pearson Correlation .498 Sig. 2-tailed .005 N 30 VAR00004 Pearson Correlation .220 Sig. 2-tailed .243 N 30 VAR00005 Pearson Correlation .624 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00006 Pearson Correlation .570 Sig. 2-tailed .001 N 30 VAR00007 Pearson Correlation .578 Sig. 2-tailed .001 N 30 VAR00008 Pearson Correlation .515 Sig. 2-tailed .004 N 30 VAR00009 Pearson Correlation .543 Sig. 2-tailed .002 N 30 VAR00010 Pearson Correlation .599 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00011 Pearson Correlation .530 Sig. 2-tailed .003 N 30 VAR00012 Pearson Correlation .667 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00013 Pearson Correlation .551 Sig. 2-tailed .002 N 30 VAR00014 Pearson Correlation .341 Sig. 2-tailed .065 N 30 VAR00015 Pearson Correlation .270 Sig. 2-tailed .149 N 30 VAR00016 Pearson Correlation .587 Sig. 2-tailed .001 N 30 VAR00017 Pearson Correlation .421 Sig. 2-tailed .020 N 30 VAR00018 Pearson Correlation .447 Sig. 2-tailed .013 N 30 VAR00019 Pearson Correlation .365 Sig. 2-tailed .047 N 30 VAR00020 Pearson Correlation .598 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00021 Pearson Correlation .267 Sig. 2-tailed .153 N 30 VAR00022 Pearson Correlation .333 Sig. 2-tailed .072 N 30 VAR00023 Pearson Correlation .613 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00024 Pearson Correlation .380 Sig. 2-tailed .039 N 30 VAR00025 Pearson Correlation .288 Sig. 2-tailed .123 N 30 Jumlah Pearson Correlation 1 Sig. 2-tailed N 30 . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Audit Operasional Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 30 100.0 Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .850 25

3. Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas variabel Pengendalian Internal

Correlations Jumlah VAR00001 Pearson Correlation .602 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00002 Pearson Correlation .713 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00003 Pearson Correlation .599 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00004 Pearson Correlation .681 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00005 Pearson Correlation .727 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00006 Pearson Correlation .684 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00007 Pearson Correlation .452 Sig. 2-tailed .012 N 30 VAR00008 Pearson Correlation .588 Sig. 2-tailed .001 N 30 VAR00009 Pearson Correlation .612 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00010 Pearson Correlation .416 Sig. 2-tailed .022 N 30 VAR00011 Pearson Correlation .645 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00012 Pearson Correlation .707 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00013 Pearson Correlation .680 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00014 Pearson Correlation .626 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00015 Pearson Correlation .598 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00016 Pearson Correlation .560 Sig. 2-tailed .001 N 30 VAR00017 Pearson Correlation .716 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00018 Pearson Correlation .569 Sig. 2-tailed .001 N 30 VAR00019 Pearson Correlation .696 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 VAR00020 Pearson Correlation .627 Sig. 2-tailed .000 N 30 Jumlah Pearson Correlation 1 Sig. 2-tailed N 30 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Pengendalian Internal Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 30 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .919 20 Lampiran 5. Deskripsi Data Penelitian Statistics Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Rumah Sakit Audit Operasional Pengendalian Internal N Valid 73 73 73 Missing Mean 70.19 74.32 78.07 Median 72.00 76.00 80.00 Mode 72 76 80 Std. Deviation 6.215 5.722 7.267 Variance 38.629 32.747 52.815 Range 28 28 31 Minimum 55 58 62 Maximum 83 86 93 Sum 5124 5425 5699 Y Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Rumah Sakit Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 55 1 1.4 1.4 1.4 56 2 2.7 2.7 4.1 58 1 1.4 1.4 5.5 59 1 1.4 1.4 6.8 60 1 1.4 1.4 8.2 61 1 1.4 1.4 9.6 62 2 2.7 2.7 12.3 63 2 2.7 2.7 15.1 64 2 2.7 2.7 17.8 65 3 4.1 4.1 21.9 66 1 1.4 1.4 23.3 67 5 6.8 6.8 30.1 68 1 1.4 1.4 31.5 69 4 5.5 5.5 37.0 70 3 4.1 4.1 41.1 71 4 5.5 5.5 46.6 72 19 26.0 26.0 72.6 73 4 5.5 5.5 78.1 74 4 5.5 5.5 83.6 75 2 2.7 2.7 86.3 77 1 1.4 1.4 87.7 79 2 2.7 2.7 90.4 80 5 6.8 6.8 97.3 83 2 2.7 2.7 100.0 Total 73 100.0 100.0 X1 Audit Operasional Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 58 1 1.4 1.4 1.4 60 1 1.4 1.4 2.7 64 4 5.5 5.5 8.2 65 3 4.1 4.1 12.3 66 1 1.4 1.4 13.7 67 2 2.7 2.7 16.4 68 1 1.4 1.4 17.8 70 1 1.4 1.4 19.2 71 5 6.8 6.8 26.0 72 2 2.7 2.7 28.8 73 2 2.7 2.7 31.5 74 4 5.5 5.5 37.0 75 5 6.8 6.8 43.8 76 18 24.7 24.7 68.5 77 3 4.1 4.1 72.6 78 7 9.6 9.6 82.2 79 5 6.8 6.8 89.0 80 2 2.7 2.7 91.8 81 2 2.7 2.7 94.5 83 1 1.4 1.4 95.9 85 1 1.4 1.4 97.3 86 2 2.7 2.7 100.0 Total 73 100.0 100.0 X2 Pengendalian Internal Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 62 3 4.1 4.1 4.1 63 1 1.4 1.4 5.5 65 3 4.1 4.1 9.6 67 1 1.4 1.4 11.0 68 1 1.4 1.4 12.3 69 2 2.7 2.7 15.1 70 3 4.1 4.1 19.2 71 2 2.7 2.7 21.9 72 2 2.7 2.7 24.7 73 1 1.4 1.4 26.0 74 1 1.4 1.4 27.4 76 3 4.1 4.1 31.5 78 3 4.1 4.1 35.6 79 6 8.2 8.2 43.8 80 15 20.5 20.5 64.4 81 3 4.1 4.1 68.5 82 4 5.5 5.5 74.0 83 5 6.8 6.8 80.8 84 2 2.7 2.7 83.6 85 4 5.5 5.5 89.0 87 5 6.8 6.8 95.9 88 1 1.4 1.4 97.3 93 2 2.7 2.7 100.0 Total 73 100.0 100.0 Perhitungan Penentuan Kelas Interval dan Kecenderungan Variabel 1. Variabel Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Jumlah interval kelas dihitung dengan rumus Sturges K = 1 + 3,3 Log n = 1 + 3,3 Log 73 = 7,1489 dibulatkan menjadi 7 Rentang data = 83-55 + 1 = 29 Panjang Kelas = 297 = 4,142 dibulatkan menjadi 4 Distribusi Kecenderungan Frekuensi Variabel Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan No Interval Kelas Jumlah Frekuensi 1 55-58 4 5,48 2 59-62 5 6,85 3 63-66 8 10,96 4 67-70 13 17,81 5 71-74 31 42,46 6 75-78 3 4,11 7 79-82 9 12,33 73 100 Mean Ideal Mi = nilai maksimum + nilai minimun = 90+18 = 54 Standar Deviasi Ideal Sdi = 6 nilai maksimum - nilai minimun = 6 90-18 = 12 Penentuan Kategori: Tidak Memuaskan = Mi – SDi = 54 – 12 = 42 Cukup Memuaskan = Mi – SDi sd Mi + SDi = Mi + SDi = 54 + 12 = 54 – 12 sd 54 + 12 = 42 sd 66 Sangat Memuaskan = 66 No. Interval Kelas Frekuensi F Relatif Keterangan 1 66 56 76,71 Sangat Memuaskan 2 42 ≤ x ≤ 66 17 23,29 Cukup Memuaskan 3 42 Tidak Memuaskan 73 100 2. Variabel Audit Operasional Jumlah interval kelas dihitung dengan rumus Sturges K = 1 + 3,3 Log n = 1 + 3,3 Log 73 = 7,1489 dibulatkan menjadi 7 Rentang data = 86-58 + 1 = 29 Panjang Kelas = 297 = 4,142 dibulatkan menjadi 4 Distribusi Kecenderungan Frekuensi Variabel Audit Operasional No Interval Kelas Jumlah Frekuensi 1 58-61 2 5,48 2 62-65 7 6,85 3 66-69 4 10,96 4 70-73 10 17,81 5 74-77 30 42,46 6 78-81 16 4,11 7 82-85 4 9,59 73 100 Mean Ideal Mi = nilai maksimum + nilai minimun = 95+19 = 57 Standar Deviasi Ideal Sdi = 6 nilai maksimum - nilai minimun = 6 95-19 = 12,67 dibulatkan menjadi 13 Penentuan Kategori: Tidak Memadai = Mi – SDi = 57 – 13 = 44 Cukup Memadai = Mi – SDi sd Mi + SDi = 57 – 13 sd 57 + 13 = 44 sd 70 Sangat Memadai = Mi + SDi = 57 + 13 = 70 No. Interval Kelas Frekuensi F Relatif Keterangan 1 70 60 82,19 Sangat Memadai 2 44 ≤ x ≤ 70 13 17,81 Cukup Memadai 3 44 Tidak Memadai 73 100

3. Pengendalian Internal

Jumlah interval kelas dihitung dengan rumus Sturges K = 1 + 3,3 Log n = 1 + 3,3 Log 73 = 7,1489 dibulatkan menjadi 7 Rentang data = 93-62 + 1 = 32 Panjang Kelas = 327 = 4,571 dibulatkan menjadi 5 Distribusi Kecenderungan Frekuensi Variabel Pengendalian Internal No Interval Kelas Jumlah Frekuensi 1 62-66 7 9,59 2 67-71 9 12,33 3 72-76 7 9,59 4 77-81 27 36,98 5 82-86 15 20,55 6 87-91 6 8,22 7 92-96 2 2,74 73 100 Mean Ideal Mi = nilai maksimum + nilai minimun = 100+20 = 60 Standar Deviasi Ideal Sdi = 6 nilai maksimum - nilai minimun = 6 100-20 = 13,33 dibulatkan menjadi 13 Penentuan Kategori: Tidak Memadai = Mi – SDi = 60 – 13 = 47 Cukup Memadai = Mi – SDi sd Mi + SDi = 60 – 13 sd 60 + 13 = 47 sd 73 Sangat Memadai = Mi + SDi = 60 + 13 = 73 No. Interval Kelas Frekuensi F Relatif Keterangan 1 73 53 72,60 Sangat Memadai 2 47 ≤ x ≤ 73 20 27,40 Cukup Memadai 3 47 Tidak Memadai 73 100 Lampiran 6. Pengujian Prasyarat dan Pengujian Asumsi Klasik 1. Uji Linearitas Means Y X1 Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Rumah Sakit Audit Operasional Report Y X1 Mean N Std. Deviation 58 61.00 1 . 60 55.00 1 . 64 61.75 4 1.893 65 62.67 3 5.033 66 56.00 1 . 67 58.00 2 2.828 68 65.00 1 . 70 69.00 1 . 71 68.20 5 2.168 72 70.00 2 4.243 73 68.00 2 5.657 74 71.75 4 1.258 75 75.60 5 6.841 76 71.28 18 3.545 77 70.33 3 2.887 78 72.71 7 4.923 79 74.00 5 2.915 80 72.00 2 .000 81 80.00 2 .000 83 74.00 1 . 85 74.00 1 . 86 80.00 2 .000 Total 70.19 73 6.215 ANOVA Table Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Y X1 Between Groups Combined 2041.442 21 97.212 6.701 .000 Linearity 1628.664 1 1628.664 112.2 65 .000 Deviation from Linearity 412.778 20 20.639 1.423 .155 Within Groups 739.873 51 14.507 Total 2781.315 72 Means Y X2 Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Rumah Sakit Pengendalian Internal Report Y X2 Mean N Std. Deviation 62 56.33 3 1.528 63 61.00 1 . 65 61.67 3 6.658 67 62.00 1 . 68 62.00 1 . 69 61.00 2 2.828 70 63.67 3 .577 71 67.00 2 2.828 72 66.00 2 1.414 73 69.00 1 . 74 69.00 1 . 76 67.33 3 2.517 78 72.33 3 .577 79 70.50 6 2.665 80 72.00 15 1.813 81 72.33 3 .577 82 72.75 4 .957 83 75.60 5 3.847 84 72.00 2 .000 85 70.50 4 6.351 87 78.20 5 4.025 88 83.00 1 . 93 80.00 2 .000 Total 70.19 73 6.215 ANOVA Table Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Y X2 Between Groups Combined 2326.065 22 105.730 11.612 .000 Linearity 2086.888 1 2086.888 229.202 .000 Deviation from Linearity 239.177 21 11.389 1.251 .254 Within Groups 455.250 50 9.105 Total 2781.315 72

2. Uji Multikolinearitas

Dokumen yang terkait

Pengaruh Komunikasi Internal Terhadap Kinerja Tenaga Kesehatan Rumah Sakit Umum Herna Medan

10 135 152

Pengakuan dan Pengukuran Pendapatan pada Rumah Sakit Estomihi Medan

0 34 94

ANALISIS BUDAYA PATIENT SAFETY RUMAH SAKIT QUEEN LATIFA YOGYAKARTA

6 33 98

Pengaruh Audit Operasional terhadap Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Rawat Inap di Rumah Sakit (Studi Kasus pada Rumah Sakit Immanuel Bandung).

46 173 22

Pengaruh Audit Operasional terhadap Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Rawat Inap di Rumah Sakit (Studi Kasus pada Rumah Sakit Ibu dan Anak Limijati Bandung).

1 3 23

Peranan Audit Internal dalam Menunjang Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal Persediaan Farmasi (Studi Kasus pada Rumah Sakit Immanuel).

0 0 21

Persepsi karyawan atas pengaruh peran auditor internal terhadap efektivitas pengendalian internal : studi kasus pada Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta.

5 23 131

KEPUASAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP PELAYANAN DAN KUALITAS MAKANAN PADA PASIEN RAWAT INAP DI RUMAH SAKIT QUEEN LATIFA YOGYAKARTA.

1 12 123

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) pengaruh Audit Operasioal terhadap Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Rumah Sakit; (2) pengaruh Pengendalian Internal terhadap Efektivitas Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Rumah Sakit; (3) pengaruh Audit Operasiona

0 1 163

Pengaruh pelaksana audit operasional dan pelaksana pengendalian internal terhadap efektivitas pelayanan kesehatan pada rumah sakit (studi kasus pada rumah sakit umum haji Medan) - Repository UIN Sumatera Utara

0 2 91