second questionnaire was aimed to obtain the expert judgment to evaluate the first draft of the materials.
F. Data Collection Techniques
The subjects of the research were Grade VIII students of SMPN 6 Yogyakarta in the academic year 20142015. The research used random sampling
technique to select the sample. The questionnaires were divided into two, the questionnaires for students and expert. The questionnaires were close-ended and
open-ended questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to get the information about the students’ needs and target needs.
G. Research Instrument
As stated before, there were two kinds of questionnaires in this research. The organization of the first questionnaire was described as follows:
Table 2: The Organization of the Questionnaire for Students
Question Number
Criteria of Questions
The purpose of the Questions 3
Topic To find out the topic for material that students want
Nunan, 2004: 47-49. 1
Goal To find out the goal of the students in learning English
Nunan, 2004: 41-42. 2, 4, 6
Input To find out the input that students want Nunan, 2004:
47-49. 5, 7, 8,
and 9 Procedures To find out the speaking activity that students prefer
Nunan, 2004: 52-63. 10 and 11
Teacher role
To find out the information about the role of the teacher should play Nunan, 2004: 64.
12 Learner
role To find out the information about the learner role
Nunan, 2004: 64. 13 and 14
Setting To find out the appropriate setting for the students in
doing the tasks Nunan, 2004: 70.
Meanwhile, for the materials evaluation, a questionnaire was adapted from the guideline of materials evaluation published by BNSP 2006. There were 28
close-ended questions for each unit, and there was a general comment page for the whole units. There was also a recommended page for the whole units. The close-
ended questions were divided into four main points of evaluation such as the content, language, presentation, and layout appropriateness.
H. Data Collection Technique
1.
Needs Analysis Questionnaire
The needs analysis questionnaire was analyzed using frequencies and percentages. The representation of the students
’ needs could be seen from the highest percentage of each answer. The percentage was calculated using the
following formula. P =
� � 100 �
Where: P
= percentage F
= frequency 100 = fixed number
N = total respondents
2.
Expert Judgment Questionnaire
The expert judgment questionnaire used the Likert-Scale questionnaire which was analyzed using descriptive analysis. The formula is proposed by
Suharto 2006: 52-53 and can be seen as follows: