Triangulation Research Procedure RESEARCH METODHOLOGY

as well. He knows his friends well, and it made him comfortable in working in groups. Moreover, he felt developed by working with his friends. Student 2 Ya kebetulan sebagai pemain, dan kebetulan teman sekelompok saya adalah teman satu kelas, teman-teman biasa bermain dan belajar, jadi saya sudah tau orangnya seperti apa, cara mereka bekerja seperti apa, jadi itu bisa membuat nyaman. Dan mereka juga membantu saya dalam berkembang sebagai seorang pemain dalam play tersebut. [Fortunately, I was appointed as player, and unintentionally my groupmates were my classmates and also my bestfriends. I understood them well; I knew the way they worked. I felt comfortable and developed in doing my role as a player.] Not only student 2 got great experience, but student 5 also told his experience. He felt that Play Performance is fun, because they worked together. Furthermore, Play Performance forced him to improve his creativity. He got some parts of the dialogue that he found not comedic. However, he had to think hard to be creative to make the “not funny” become funny. Student 5 Play itu sangat menantang menurut pribadiku, dan seru, terutama meningkatkan kemampuan kerjasama kelompok. Saya males ribet, kalo semester 5 saya lihat time tablenya udah banyak banget, saya memutuskan semster 6 aja biar otaknya tidak kerja keras. Dulu jadi player, sebenernya udah males, udah biasa maju ke depan, pinginnya selain player, eh tapi akhirnya jadi player. Susahnya jadi player itu bikin jadi lucu, padahal ga lucu sama sekali ceritanya scriptnya, jadi harus menunjukkan gesture yang lucu. [I think Play Performance was very challenging and fun, especially in improving teamwork skill. I had a lot of things to do on semester 5, so I took Play Performance on semester 6, so I do not have to force my brain. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI Actually, I did not want to be a player. What was difficult of becoming a player was making it to be comedical. Actually, the script was not funny at all, so I had to make funny gesture.] Both result indicates that the students got many valuable experiences. Even, there were students who should work harder to finish the tasks assigned to them. Moreover, the process of working with others makes students developed. It is because they got new lessons from others that they did not have before. For the next part, the researcher is going to display the result of the implementation of collaborative learning elements. Next, the researcher is going to display the results of the implementation of the collaborative learning elements and discuss them. Before discussing the details of the findings, the researcher is going to display the results of general illustration of each elements that implemented by the students. Collaborative elements are the basic things in the implementation of collaborative learning. When the elements are appllied well, the collaborative learning is going on the right the track. There are five elements of collaborative by Johnson et al 1990. Number one is Perceived Positive Interdependence element, which resulted in 87 in general. Number two is a Considerable Interaction element, which resulted in 87 in general. Number three is Individual Accountablity and Personal Responsibility element, that get 98 in general. Number four is Social Skills that get 80. Number five is Group Self- Evaluation, that get 87. Based on the data above the higest element belongs to Individual accountability and personal responsibility, and the lowest element belongs to social skills element. Figure 4.2 Collaborative elements

1. Perceived Positive Interdependence

Johnson 1990 states that in doing collaborative learning, members help and encourages each other to learn. This means that the positive progress of the team is based on the feedback of the team ’s members. They need each other in order to improve themselves. While there is an aspect that is not going well, that would give effect to the whole team. Generally, the element of Perceived Positive Inter- dependence got 87 as the average. The details are described as follows: Perceived positive interdependence ; 87 Cinsiderable interaction ; 87 Individual accountability and Personal responsibility; 98 Social skills; 80 Group self- evaluation; 91