Data of Experimental Class 11.4

36 Student No. Pre Test Post Test Gained Score 27 44 62 18 28 64 70 6 29 58 68 10 30 62 70 8 ∑ 1640 1926 286 Average Score 54.6

64.2 9.53

In the Table 4.2 above, it was shown that the highest score in pre test on Controlled Class was 70 and the lowest score was 42, furthermore, the highest score in post test on Controlled Class was 84 and the lowest score was 46. The average score on Controlled Class was slightly increased by 9.53 points and the total of gained score was 286. In the next page, the scanned pages of pre-test instrument can be seen. 37

2. Data Analysis

a. Normality Test

The researcher using Shapiro-Wilk as the normality test testing, it is because the sample is 30 which is below 50, therefore the hypotheses are as follows: H : Data of X is normally distributed. H 1 : Data of X is not normally distributed. H is accepted if the significant value of Shapiro-Wilk Test is higher than significant value α 0,05. 1 Normality of Pre-test Table 4.3 Normality of Pre-test Tests of Normality Kelas Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Pre_test Experimental .101 20 .200 .959 20 .520 Controlled .124 40 .124 .965 40 .252 . This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction The table above shows that the significant value of normality test in Pre-test on Experimental class was 0.520 while in the Controlled Class was 0.252. From these scores, it can be concluded that the significance in Experimental Class is higher than α 0.05 0.520 0.05 and the significance in Controlled Class also higher than α 0.05 0.252 0.05. Thus, the H is accepted and it means the data are normally distributed 38 2 Normality of Post-test Table 4.4 Normality of Post-test Tests of Normality kelas Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Post_test Experimental .159 20 .200 .958 20 .502 Controlled .145 40 .034 .964 40 .228 . This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction The table above shows that the significant value of normality test in Post Test on Experimental class was 0.502 while in the Controlled Class was 0.228. From these scores, it can be concluded that the significance in Experimental Class is higher than α 0.05 0.502 0.05 and the significance in Controlled Class also higher than α 0.05 0.228 0.05. Thus, the H is accepted and it means the data are normally distributed.

b. Homogeneity Test

After calculating data normality, the researcher needs to calculate the homogeneity of data. Whether it is homogeny or heterogenic, it will be calculated using Descriptive Statistic formula in SPSS 23 program for Windows as already been described in Chapter 3. Below are the hypotheses and results. Hypothesis: H : The sample of experimental class is not different from controlled class or the sample is homogeneous. H 1 : The sample of experimental class is different from controlled class or the sample is heterogeneous.

Dokumen yang terkait

A Descriptive Study on Grammatical Errors of the Eighth Grade Students' Narrative Text Writing at SMPN 1 Wuluhan Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 3

The Effect of Using Animated Video on the Eighth Grade Students' Listening Comprehension Achievement at SMPN 1 Bangsalsari

0 5 3

The Effect of Using Different Types of Tasks on the tenth Grade Students' Reading Comprehension Achievement

0 3 12

The Effect of Using Roundtable Technique on the Eighth Grade Students' Writing Achievement at SMPN 1 Wuluhan Jember in the 2014/2015 Academic Year

0 4 4

The Effect of Using Story Mapping Technique on the Eighth Grade Students' Reading Comprehension Achievement at SMPN 8 Jember.

0 17 4

The Effectiveness of Using Storyboard Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Tenth Grade of MAN 1 Tangerang Selatan)

3 41 145

The Effect of Reciprocal Technique towards Students' Reading Comprehension on Report Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study of Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 3 South Tangerang

0 34 132

The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMA Mathla’ul Huda Parung Panjang-Bogor.

0 5 126

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method towards Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan year 2015/2016)

0 3 72