52
Fig 2.13.1. Job classification both agriculture and non agriculture and waiting time before employment of the AGH graduates Source : Tracer
Study IPB, 2009
2.14. Output
Average duration of study at Dept of AGH between 20062007 to 20092010 is 53.7 months, where 38.07 of students completed their study for 48 months, 37.54
for 49-54 months, 13.38 for 55-60 months, and 11.01 for more than 60 months Table 2.14.1. These data demonstrated that most students graduate within the
designated period for completion under the existing education curricullum. The good academic atmosphere, good implementation of education programs, and the good
quality students enrolled at the department contributed to the student success. Cummulative Grade Point CGP is the criteria or standard used to determine
student’s academic performance. Data of the students and their study performance CGP indicated that the teaching and learning process at the SP-AGH is sufficient to
improve the qualification of the students. The average CGP of the graduates has improved during the last 5 years 2006-2010, i.e. 3.02 in 20062007, 3.00 in
53
20072008, 3.01 in 20082009, 3.05 in 20092010 and 3.10 in 20102011 Table 2.14.2. There has been an increasing number of students with CGP of 3.01-3.50 i.e
39.8 in 20062007 to 53.6 in 20092010. The increase in CGP is an evident that the curricullum developed at Dept of AGH are appropriate for the students learning
process. Table 2.14.1. Average study completion duration months at Dept of AGH,
Faculty of Agriculture, IPB Year 20062007 – 20092010
Study Duration
months 20062007
20072008 20082009
20092010 20102011
Average Number
Number Number
Number Number
=48 68
41.0 65
40.9 70
44.30 40
26.14 13
9.22 32.30
49-54 55
33.1 65
40.9 48
30.38 70
45.75 76
53.9 40.81
55-60 21
12.7 19
11.9 23
14.56 22
14.38 38
26.95 16.10 60
22 13.3
10 6.3
17 10.76
21 13.73
14 9.93
10.79 Average
52.6 54.0
54.0 54.4
55.25
The students drop out rate based on data 20062007 – 20102011 is around
2.41 to the total number of students. The number of drop out varies with time Table 2.14.3, and mostly occurred on the first year, due to the failures of the
students in passing the basic courses in the common first year. The failures after the students joint the Department year 2-4 were 3.2 for entry students in 2007, and
1.9 for entry student in 2008. Academic staff of Dept of AGH show active contribution both in research
Appendix 2.6.2 and publication Appendix 2.6.6. Overall, the topics vary from basic to applied research in various aspects of agronomy disciplines. Almost all of
the research fundings come from competitive grant that reflect the high qualification of academic staff. Student research for final project could be as part of academic
staff research or independent topics proposed by themselves. Student research process was evaluated by survey and resulted in satisfaction see Table 2.15.1,
54
whereas the substance was evaluated by the Examination committe which compose of supervissor, external examiner, and appointed examiner from the study program.
Table 2.14.2. CGP of Dept of AGH graduates, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB, 2006-2010
Year CGP
Total 2.00-2.75
2.75-3.00 3.01-3.50
3.50
20062007 Number
40 48
66 12
166 24.1
28.9 39.8
7.2 100.0
Average 3.02
20072008 Number
36 46
61 16
159 22.6
28.9 38.4
10.1 100.0
Average 3.00
20082009 Number
35 41
67 15
158 22.2
25.9 42.4
9.5 100.0
Average 3.01
20092010 Number
20 44
82 7
153 13.1
28.8 53.6
4.6 100.0
Average 3.05
20102011 Number
15 23
91 12
141 10.6
16.4 64.5
8.5 100.0
Average 3.10
Table 2.14.3. The number of drop out students at Dept of AGH, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB.
Academic Year of
Entry Students
Number of Entry Students
Drop Out Number 1st year
2nd year
3 rd year
4th and after
Total Number
2007 164
7 1
1 3
12 7.3 2008
163 4
2 1
7 4.3 2009
164 1
progress 2010
177 2
- progress
55
2.15. Stakeholder Satisfaction
