The Experimental Group The Control Group

59 the right mechanics, I also taught them when they should use full stop, colon, semicolon, etc. From the chart and the analysis, it could be seen that there is an improvement among each aspect. The treatment had influenced the writing ability of the experimental group. Their writing ability improved after the treatment was given.

4.2.2 The Computation of the t-Test

I did the t-test to know the effectiveness of the treatment which was given to the students of the experimental group and the control group and the significant difference between both groups. The first step before doing the t-test was calculating the average scores of the experimental and the control groups’ pretest and the posttest scores. Besides calculating the average scores, I should complete three assumptions of the t-test before calculating the t-test.

4.2.2.1 The Experimental Group

After conducting the research in the experimental group, I calculated the average scores of the pretest and the posttest based on the research result. 4.2.2.1.1 The Average Score of the Pretest Scores The pretest was conducted at the beginning of the research. It was done on May 2, 2011. There were 37 students who took the pretest. The purpose of giving the pretest to the students of the experimental group was to check the students’ achievement in writing a narrative text before teaching writing narrative texts using video clips as media in the treatment. In order to know the students’ achievement in detail, the following formula was used to find out the average of the students’ pretest score: 60 Where, X 1 = the mean the average score of the pretest scores of the experimental group students ΣX 1 = the total of the experimental group students’ pretest scores N X1 = the total of the experimental group students The computation of the mean the average score of the pretest scores of the experimental group students was: 4.2.2.1.2 The Average Score of the Posttest Scores On May 18, 2011, I gave the posttest to the students of the experimental group. The posttest was conducted at the end of the research. 37 students took the posttest. The purpose of giving the posttest to the students of the experimental group was to check the students’ achievement in writing a narrative text after teaching writing narrative text using video clips as media in the treatment. The following formula was used to find out the average of the students’ posttest score: Where, X 2 = the mean the average score of the posttest scores of the experimental group students ΣX 2 = the total of the experimental group students’ posttest scores N X2 = the total of the experimental group students The computation of the mean the average score of the posttest score of the 61 experimental group students was:

4.2.2.2 The Control Group

Besides conducting the research in the experimental group, I also conducted the research in the control group. I, then, also calculated the average scores of the pretest and the posttest of the control group based on the research result. 4.2.2.2.1 The Average Score of the Pretest Scores Like the experimental group, I also gave the pretest for the students of the control group. The pretest was conducted at the beginning of the research. It was done on May 2, 2011. There were 37 students who took the pretest. The purpose of giving the pretest to the students of the control group was to check the students’ achievement in writing a narrative text before teaching writing narrative texts using series of pictures as media in the treatment. The following formula was used to find out the average of the control group students’ pretest score: Where, Y 1 = the mean the average score of the pretest scores of the control group students ΣY 1 = the total of the control group students’ pretest scores N Y1 = the total of the control group students The computation of the mean the average score of the pretest score of the control group students was: 62 4.2.2.2.2 The Average Score of the Posttest Scores On May 20, 2011, I gave the posttest to the students of the control group. The posttest was conducted at the end of the research. 37 students took the posttest. The purpose of giving the posttest to the students of the control group was to check the students’ achievement in writing a narrative text after teaching writing narrative texts using series of pictures as media in the treatment. In order to know the students’ achievement in detail, the following formula was used to find out the average of the students’ posttest score: Where, Y 2 = the mean the average score of the posttest scores of the control group students ΣY 2 = the total of the control group students’ posttest scores N Y2 = the total of the control group students The computation of the mean the average score of the posttest score of the control group students was:

4.2.2.3 The Result of the t-Test

Dokumen yang terkait

Using Story Mapping To Teach Students' Writing Ability of Narrative Text (A-Pre-experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade students of SMA Negeri 90 Jakarta)

0 18 0

The Effectiveness of Paraphrasing to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension Skills of Hortatory Exposition Text (a Pre Experimental Study at Grade XI of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun in the Academic Year of 2010 2011

3 40 153

The Effectiveness of Tree Diagram Technique as a Means of Teaching Writing (An Experimental Study of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

1 9 90

The Use of Genre Based Approach in Teaching Writing Procedural Texts to Improve Students’ Writing Skill to the Eleventh Grade of SMK N 1 Slawi (In the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 6 118

The Use of Think Pair Share Strategy to Improve Students’ Speaking Ability (An Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N 1 Karangkobar in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 8 112

USING A FOUR PHASE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ IMAGINATIVE WRITING SKILLS (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo in the Academic Year of 20092

0 12 177

The Effectiveness of Tree Diagram Technique as a Means of Teaching Writing (An Experimental Study of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 1

(ABSTRAK) USING VIDEO CLIPS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILLS OF NARRATIVE TEXTS (An Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Mranggen in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 3

USING FILM CLIPS TO IMPROVE LISTENING SKILLS AMONG THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 SLEMAN YOGYAKARTA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/2014.

0 0 313

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SMA MUHAMMADIYAH MATARAM ACADEMIC YEAR 20182019

0 1 15