The t-Test Methods of Analyzing Data

47 Very good : 22-20 Average : 19-17 Needs work : 16-0 • has introductory paragraph with clear introductory statement • has body paragraph with good organization • has concluding paragraph • has coherence and cohesion Exceptional : 25-23 Very good : 22-20 Average : 19-17 Needs work : 16-0 GrammarStructure • demonstrates control of basic grammar e.g., tenses, verb forms, noun forms, preposition, articles • shows sophistication of sentence structure with complex and compound sentences Exceptional : 15-14 Very good : 13-12 Average : 11-10 Needs work : 9-0 Word ChoiceWord Form • demonstrates sophisticated choice of vocabulary items • has correct idiomatic use of vocabulary • has correct word forms Exceptional : 10 Very good : 9-8 Average : 7-6 Needs work : 5-0 Mechanics • has good paragraph format • demonstrates good control over use of capital letters, periods, commas, and semicolons • demonstrates control over spelling • does not have fragments, comma splices, or run-on sentences The students’ score of writing test = content score + organization score + grammar score + word choice score + mechanics score = 25 + 25 + 25 + 15 + 10 = 100. While the average of the students’ score in both pretest and posttest was counted by using the formula below: the total of the students’ score The average of the students’ score = the total of the students

3.8.2. The t-Test

All data collected of this study were analyzed. I compared the students’ score in pretest and posttest. The results of the comparison were used to answer the 48 statement of the problem of this study, whether there is significant difference between writing achievement of students who are taught writing narrative texts by using video clips and those who are taught without using video clips as media. “A t-test is a statistical test that allows you to compare two means to determine the probability that the difference between the means is a real difference rather than a chance difference” Tuckman 1978: 257. Based on Arikunto 2006: 311, the t-test formula is: Where, t = t value M x = the mean score of the experimental group M y = the mean score of the control group Σx 2 = the total of the square deviation of the experimental group Σy 2 = the total of the square deviation of the control group N x = the number of the students of the experimental group N y = the number of the students of the control group “To decide whether the sample means do differ enough, the researcher must compare his calculated t value with an appropriate critical value. Two factors which are used to find the correct critical value are the degree of freedom df associated with his calculated t value and the level of significance” Huck, Cormier, and Bounds1974: 51. To find the degree of freedom df, the formula is: df = the total number of data observations upon which his t test is based - 2 49 Huck, Cormier, and Bounds 1974: 52 state that “after locating the critical value in the t table, the researcher compares his calculated t value against it. If the calculated t value is larger than the critical value, the researcher is then able to say that a significant difference exists between the two sample means. On the other hand, if the calculated t value is less than the critical value, the researcher will be forced to conclude that the two sample means are not significantly different from one another.” In addition, based on http:en.wikipedia.orgwikiStudent’s_t- test accessed June 14, 2011, in the t-test comparing the means of two independent samples, the following assumption should be met: 1 Each of the two populations being compared should follow a normal distribution. This can be tested using a normality test. 2 If using student’s original definition of the t-test, the two populations being compared should have the same variance. 3 The data used to carry out the test should be sampled independently from the two populations being compared. 50

CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS

This chapter deals with the analysis of the data that were found from the activities during the research. It consists of the result of the study, the result of pretest, and posttest. This chapter also presents the comparison between the result of the pretest and the posttest.

4.1 Results of the Study

The data were obtained from the students’ scores achievement of the writing test of narrative texts. They were pretest scores and posttest scores from the experimental group and the control group. The total scores of writing test consisted of the scores of five elements of good writing: content, organization, grammar, word choice, and mechanics score. The complete computation of those five elements scores can be read on Appendix 11, 12, 13, 14. The following tables are the simple tables for the scores of five elements of good writing for the pretest and the posttest: Table 4.1 The Simple Table for the Scores of Five Elements of Good Writing for the Pretest Elements of Good Writing The Experimental Group The Control Group Content 658 644 Organization 658 637 Grammar 589 591 Word Choice 381 372 Mechanics 223 225 Total 2509 2469

Dokumen yang terkait

Using Story Mapping To Teach Students' Writing Ability of Narrative Text (A-Pre-experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade students of SMA Negeri 90 Jakarta)

0 18 0

The Effectiveness of Paraphrasing to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension Skills of Hortatory Exposition Text (a Pre Experimental Study at Grade XI of SMA Negeri 1 Kutowinangun in the Academic Year of 2010 2011

3 40 153

The Effectiveness of Tree Diagram Technique as a Means of Teaching Writing (An Experimental Study of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

1 9 90

The Use of Genre Based Approach in Teaching Writing Procedural Texts to Improve Students’ Writing Skill to the Eleventh Grade of SMK N 1 Slawi (In the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 6 118

The Use of Think Pair Share Strategy to Improve Students’ Speaking Ability (An Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N 1 Karangkobar in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 8 112

USING A FOUR PHASE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ IMAGINATIVE WRITING SKILLS (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo in the Academic Year of 20092

0 12 177

The Effectiveness of Tree Diagram Technique as a Means of Teaching Writing (An Experimental Study of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Bae Kudus in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 1

(ABSTRAK) USING VIDEO CLIPS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILLS OF NARRATIVE TEXTS (An Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Mranggen in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 3

USING FILM CLIPS TO IMPROVE LISTENING SKILLS AMONG THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 SLEMAN YOGYAKARTA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/2014.

0 0 313

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SMA MUHAMMADIYAH MATARAM ACADEMIC YEAR 20182019

0 1 15