108
Bouckeenoghe, D. Devos, G.2007. The role of process, context and individual characteristics in explaining readiness to change : A multilevel analysis.
Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School. Chalofsky, N. Krishna, V. 2009. Meaningfulness, commitment and
engagement : The intersection of a deeper level of intrinsic motivation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 112, 189-203.
Ciliana Mansoer, W. D. 2008. Pengaruh kepuasan kerja, keterlibatan kerja, stress kerja dan komitmen organisasi terhadap kesiapan untuk berubah
pada karyawan PT. Bank Y. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial,
142, 151-164.
Conner, D.R, Patterson, R.B. 1982. Building commitment to organizational change. Training and Development Journal, 364, 18-30.
Cook, S. 2008. The essential guide to employee engagement, better business performance through staff satisfaction. London : Kogan Page.
Crabtree, S. 2005. Engagement keeps the doctor away. Gallup Management
Journal, 13, 1-4. Cummings, T. Worley, C. 1997. Managing change. In organizational
development and change. Seventh edition, Cincinnati : South-West College Publishing.
Desplaces, D. 2005. A multilevel approach to individual readiness to change,
Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 71, 25-39. Desyani, A. 2012. Holding perkebunan rampung februari. [online].
http:www.tempo.coreadnews20120124090379380Holding- Perkebunan-Rampung-Februari. Tanggal akses Desember 2012.
Dirks, K.T., Cummings, L.L., Pierce, J. 1996. Psychological ownership in
organizations : Conditions under which individual promote and resist change. In R. Woodman W. Pasmore Eds. Research in Organizational
Change and Development. 9, 1-23. Greenwich, CT : Jai Press INC.
Eby, L. T., Adams, D. M., Russell, J. E. A., Gaby S. H. 2000. Perceptions of
Universita Sumatera Utara
109
organizational readiness for change: Factors related to employees reactions to the implementation of team based selling. Human Relations,
533, 419-442.
Echols, M.E. 2005. Engaging employees to impact performance. Chief Learning Officer, 12, 44-48.
Engelbrecht, S. 2006. Motivation and burnout in human service work : The case
of midwifery in Denmark. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Roskilde University.
Finney, M.I. 2008. Building high performance people and organizations,
1, 109-122. Westport, CT : Prager. Garber, P.R. 2007. 50 activities for employee engagement. Amherst,
Massachusets. Human Resource Development Press. Ghozali, I. 2006. Aplikasi analisis multivariat dengan program SPSS. Cetakan
keempat. Semarang : Badan penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Gubman, E. 2004. From engagement to passion for work. The search for the
missing person. HR Planning, 13, 42-46. Guy, G.R. Beauman, K.V. 2005. Effecting change in business enterprises :
Current trends in change management. The conference board.
Hadi, S. 2000. Metodologi research Jilid I-IV. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi. Hall, T.D., Schneider, B. 1972. Correlates of organizational identification as a
function of career pattern and organizational type. Administrative Science Quarterly. 17,3, 340-350.
Hanpachern, C., Morgan, G.A. Griego, O.V. 1998. An extension of the theory
of margin:A framework for assesing readiness for change. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 94, 339-350.
Universita Sumatera Utara
110
Hanpachern, C. 1997. The extension of the theory of margin: A framework for assesing readiness for change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Colorado State University, Fort Collins. Hewitt Associates. 2004. Hewitt Associates study shows more engaged
employees drive improve business performance and return. Press Release, May.
Holt, D.T. 2003. Readiness for change : The development of a scale.
Dissertation. Auburn University. Holt, D.T, Armenakis, A. A., Field, H. S., Harris, S. G. 2007. Readiness for
organizational change: The systematic development of a scale, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43,2, 232-255.
Hussey, D.E. 2000. How to manage organization change. London : Kagan page. Huy, Q.N. 1999. Emotional capability, emotional intelligence and radical
change. Academy of Management Review, 24, 325-345. Irsut.
2012. Penolakan
rencana holding
BUMN perkebunan.
[online].http:dplaying.blogspot.com201210spbun-bicara.html. Tanggal akses Desember 2012.
Iverson, R.D. 1996. Employee acceptance of organizational change: The role of
organizational commitment. The International of Human Resource Management. 71, 122-149.
Jay. 2012. Haruskah karyawan PTPN mengetahui manfaat holding?. [online].
http:pphe-ri.comdetailhlb.asp?id=2975. Tanggal akses Desember 2012 Julita Rafaei 2010. Relationship of organizational commitment,locus of
control and readiness to change among nurses. Psycho behavioral science and quality of life : The 6
th
International Postgraduate Research Colloquium.
Jones, G.R. 2007. Organizational theory. Design and change. New Jersey :
Pearson Education.
Universita Sumatera Utara
111
Kahn, W.A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and
disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal. 334, 692-724. Kerlinger, F.N., Lee, H.B. 2000. Foundations of behavioral research 4 ed.
Holt, NY : Harcourt College Publishers. Kreitner, R Kinicki, A. 2004. Organizational behaviour 6th edition. United
States of America : Irwin McGraw-Hill. Kular, S., Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E., Truss, K. 2008. Employee
engagement : A literature review. Kingston University : Working paper series, 19.
Kumar, R. 2005. Research methodology. London : Sage Publication. Lucey, J. J., Bateman, N. Hines, P. 2005. Why major lean transitions have not
been sustained. Management Services, 492, 9-14. Mangundjaya, W.L.H. 2012. Are organizational commitment and employee
engagement important in achieving individual readiness for change?. Humanitas, 92, 185-192.
Marciano, P.L. 2010 Carrots and sticks don’t work : Build a culture of employee
engagement with the principles of RESPECT. USA : McGraw Hill. Madsen, S. R., Miller, D., John C. R., 2005, Readiness for organizational
change : Do organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference. Human Resource Development Quarterly,
162, 213-233.
Madsen, S. R. 2011. Influential factors in individual readiness for change.
Journal of Business and Management. 122, 93-110. Megani, A. 2012. Hubungan antara employee engagement dan kesiapan
karyawan untuk berubah Studi pada PT. X. Skripsi. Fakultas Psikologi : Universitas Indonesia.
Universita Sumatera Utara
112
Mowday, R, T. , Porter, L. W Steers, R. M. 1982. Employee-organization
linkages : The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York : Academic Press.
Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Hersecovith, L Topolnitsky, L. 2002. Affective,
continuance and normative commitment to the organization : A meta analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M. 1982. Employee organization
linkages. The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York : Academic Press.
Mowday, R., Steers, R. Porter, L. 1979. The measurement of organizational
commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-227. Morrow. P.C. 1983. Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of
work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 486-500. Muluk, C., Diponegoro, A. Lubis, I.F. 2007. Restrukturisasi BUMN
perkebunan melalui holding company. Jurnal Transformasi Bisnis. 25, 10-18.
Noordin, M.N. 2008. Relationships between emotional intelligence, leadership
behavior and organizational commitment with organizational readiness for change in Malaysian institute of higher learning. Phd Thesis. Universiti
Putra Malaysia.
Olson, D.A., Tetrick, L.E. 1988. Organizational restructuring : The impact on
role perceptions, work relationships and satisfaction. Group and organization studies, 133, 374-388.
Petterson, S. 2009. Organizational change management : Getting from here to
there. Knowledge Peak.
Universita Sumatera Utara
113
Piderit, S.K. 2000. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence : A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change.
Academy of Management Review, 25, 783-794. Post, J.E Altman, B.W. 1994. Managing the environmental change process :
Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 74 : 67-83.
Pramadani, A.B. Fajrianthi. 2012. Hubungan antara komitmen organisasi dengan kesiapan untuk berubah pada karyawan divisi enterprise service
DES Telkom Kelintang Surabaya. Jurnal Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 12, 102-109.
Robbins, S.P. 1996. Perilaku organisasi. Jakarta : PT Bhuana Ilmu Komputer.
Robinson, D. Hayday, S. 2003. Employee engagement. Institute for employment studies. [online]. Available from http:www.employment-
studies.co.uknews129theme.php accessed on 150508. Saks, A.M. 2006. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement.
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 217, 600-619. Santoso, S. 2002. Statistik multivariat. Jakarta : PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Romá, V. Bakker, A. B. 2002. The
Measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 31, 71-92.
Schaufeli, W.B. Martinez, I. Marques Pinto, A. Salanova, M., Bakker, A.B. 2002. Burnout and engagement in university students : Across national
study. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 33, 464-481.
Schaufeli, W.B Bakker, A.B. 2004 Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement : A Multi-Sample Study.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
Shah, N. 2009. Determinants of employee readiness for organisational changes. Thesis. Brunel University.
Universita Sumatera Utara
114
Shaw, K. 2005. Employee engagement. How to build a high performance workforce. Melcrum Publishing Limited. Washington, DC.
Shaw, K. 2005. An engagement strategy process for communicators. Strategic
Communication Management, 93, 26-29. Sopiah. 2008. Perilaku Organisasional. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi.
Steers, R.M. 1997. Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 340-350. Stum, D.L. 1998. Five ingredients for an employee retention formula. HR focus,
S9-10. Sugiyono. 2011. Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan RD. Bandung :
Afabeta CV. Vakola, M. Nikolau, I. 2005. Attitudes towards organizational change: What
is the role of employees‟ stress and commitment? Employee Relations, 27,
160-174. Vidal, M. 2007. Lean production, worker empowerment and job satisfaction:A
qualitative analysis and critique. Critical Sociology, 33, 247-278. Visagle, C.M. Steyn, C. 2011. Organizational commitment and responses to
planned organizational change : An exploratory study. Southern African Business Review, 153.
Wellins, R. Concelman, J. 2005. Creating a culture for engagement.
Workforce performance solutions. Retrieved August, 1, 2005. www.WPSmag.com
Wibisono 2003. Riset bisnis. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Wursanto. 2005. Dasar-dasar ilmu organisasi. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi.
Universita Sumatera Utara
115
Yousef, D.A. 2000. Organizational commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of attitudes toward organizational change in a non-western
setting. Personel Review, 295, 567-592. Zigarmi, D., Kim, N., Dobie, H., David, W. Jim, D. 2009. Beyond
engagement:Toward a framework and operational definition for employee work passion. Human Resource Development Review; 83, 300-326.
Universita Sumatera Utara
116
LAMPIRAN
Universita Sumatera Utara
117
LAMPIRAN A HASIL UJI COBA SKALA KESIAPAN BERUBAH
HASIL UJI COBA SKALA KOMITMEN ORGANISASI HASIL UJI COBA SKALA EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
Universita Sumatera Utara
118
OUTPUT UJI DAYA BEDA ITEM SKALA KESIAPAN BERUBAH Case Processing Summary
N Cases
Valid 100
100.0 Excluded
a
0.0 Total
100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbachs Alpha
N of Items .927
40
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation
N item1
3.7300 .61718
100 item2
3.8500 .65713
100 item3
4.0300 .65836
100 item4
3.9800 .58569
100 item5
4.2900 .64031
100 item6
4.2000 .66667
100 item7
3.5400 .74427
100 item8
3.2100 .83236
100 item9
3.3300 .97499
100 item10
3.7000 .67420
100 item11
3.4200 .94474
100 item12
3.9900 .61126
100 item13
3.4400 .84471
100 item14
3.7500 .65713
100 item15
3.8000 .88763
100 item16
4.2800 .72586
100 item17
3.6300 .92829
100 item18
3.8800 .96693
100 item19
3.9200 .83702
100
Universita Sumatera Utara
119
item20 3.4500
.89188 100
item21 3.7500
.80873 100
item22 3.7300
.91954 100
item23 3.5800
.90095 100
item24 3.4900
.98980 100
item25 3.7600
.83024 100
item26 3.8700
.67652 100
item27 3.8600
.75237 100
item28 3.9800
.71038 100
item29 3.7400
.97047 100
item30 3.8800
.67090 100
item31 3.5100
.87033 100
item32 3.9600
.60168 100
item33 3.9000
.78496 100
item34 3.8000
.76541 100
item35 3.7000
.81029 100
item36 3.8700
.70575 100
item37 3.7800
.84781 100
item38 3.6900
.93954 100
item39 3.9100
.77973 100
item40 3.8100
.59789 100
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Total Correlation
Cronbachs Alpha if Item
Deleted item1
147.2600 254.538
.247 .927
item2 147.1400
251.940 .356
.926 item3
146.9600 248.221
.537 .924
item4 147.0100
251.586 .423
.925 item5
146.7000 249.687
.479 .925
item6 146.7900
251.461 .373
.926 item7
147.4500 255.159
.171 .928
item8 147.7800
249.749 .355
.926
Universita Sumatera Utara
120
item9 147.6600
245.338 .442
.925 item10
147.2900 251.966
.344 .926
item11 147.5700
246.894 .404
.926 item12
147.0000 248.646
.559 .924
item13 147.5500
246.896 .459
.925 item14
147.2400 249.800
.460 .925
item15 147.1900
247.852 .399
.926 item16
146.7100 252.208
.306 .926
item17 147.3600
242.738 .560
.924 item18
147.1100 239.230
.656 .923
item19 147.0700
249.419 .366
.926 item20
147.5400 243.099
.571 .924
item21 147.2400
242.225 .672
.923 item22
147.2600 241.811
.599 .924
item23 147.4100
245.861 .464
.925 item24
147.5000 241.667
.557 .924
item25 147.2300
240.745 .712
.922 item26
147.1200 246.531
.602 .924
item27 147.1300
251.508 .323
.926 item28
147.0100 250.495
.391 .926
item29 147.2500
249.361 .309
.927 item30
147.1100 246.422
.613 .924
item31 147.4800
243.666 .565
.924 item32
147.0300 251.201
.431 .925
item33 147.0900
247.881 .457
.925 item34
147.1900 243.832
.643 .923
item35 147.2900
242.915 .642
.923 item36
147.1200 246.248
.589 .924
item37 147.2100
246.854 .458
.925 item38
147.3000 242.152
.573 .924
item39 147.0800
249.084 .410
.926 item40
147.1800 250.109
.493 .925
Universita Sumatera Utara
121
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance
Std. Deviation N of Items
1.5099E2 259.788
16.11793 40
Case Processing Summary
N Cases
Valid 100
100.0 Excluded
a
0.0 Total
100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbachs Alpha
N of Items .928
38
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation
N item2
3.8500 .65713
100 item3
4.0300 .65836
100 item4
3.9800 .58569
100 item5
4.2900 .64031
100 item6
4.2000 .66667
100 item8
3.2100 .83236
100 item9
3.3300 .97499
100 item10
3.7000 .67420
100 item11
3.4200 .94474
100 item12
3.9900 .61126
100 item13
3.4400 .84471
100 item14
3.7500 .65713
100 item15
3.8000 .88763
100 item16
4.2800 .72586
100 item17
3.6300 .92829
100 item18
3.8800 .96693
100
Universita Sumatera Utara
122
item19 3.9200
.83702 100
item20 3.4500
.89188 100
item21 3.7500
.80873 100
item22 3.7300
.91954 100
item23 3.5800
.90095 100
item24 3.4900
.98980 100
item25 3.7600
.83024 100
item26 3.8700
.67652 100
item27 3.8600
.75237 100
item28 3.9800
.71038 100
item29 3.7400
.97047 100
item30 3.8800
.67090 100
item31 3.5100
.87033 100
item32 3.9600
.60168 100
item33 3.9000
.78496 100
item34 3.8000
.76541 100
item35 3.7000
.81029 100
item36 3.8700
.70575 100
item37 3.7800
.84781 100
item38 3.6900
.93954 100
item39 3.9100
.77973 100
item40 3.8100
.59789 100
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item- Total Correlation
Cronbachs Alpha if Item
Deleted item2
139.8700 242.639
.343 .927
item3 139.6900
239.085 .520
.926 item4
139.7400 242.154
.417 .927
item5 139.4300
240.227 .477
.926 item6
139.5200 242.272
.356 .927
item8 140.5100
239.949 .367
.927 item9
140.3900 235.937
.441 .927
item10 140.0200
242.666 .332
.928
Universita Sumatera Utara
123
item11 140.3000
237.202 .413
.927 item12
139.7300 239.330
.550 .926
item13 140.2800
237.436 .459
.926 item14
139.9700 240.575
.446 .927
item15 139.9200
238.418 .398
.927 item16
139.4400 242.229
.325 .928
item17 140.0900
233.376 .559
.925 item18
139.8400 229.530
.670 .924
item19 139.8000
239.919 .366
.927 item20
140.2700 233.755
.570 .925
item21 139.9700
232.999 .666
.924 item22
139.9900 232.394
.601 .925
item23 140.1400
236.000 .480
.926 item24
140.2300 232.239
.560 .925
item25 139.9600
231.473 .710
.924 item26
139.8500 236.856
.614 .925
item27 139.8600
241.899 .326
.928 item28
139.7400 240.841
.397 .927
item29 139.9800
240.000 .305
.929 item30
139.8400 236.903
.617 .925
item31 140.2100
234.289 .565
.925 item32
139.7600 241.619
.434 .927
item33 139.8200
238.432 .456
.926 item34
139.9200 234.418
.644 .925
item35 140.0200
233.616 .639
.925 item36
139.8500 236.593
.599 .925
item37 139.9400
237.471 .456
.926 item38
140.0300 232.938
.568 .925
item39 139.8100
239.590 .410
.927 item40
139.9100 240.547
.496 .926
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance
Std. Deviation N of Items
1.4372E2 250.103
15.81463 38
Universita Sumatera Utara
124
OUTPUT ANALISIS FAKTOR SKALA KESIAPAN BERUBAH 1. ASPEK APPROPRIATENESS
KMO and Bartletts Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .771
Bartletts Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square
406.719 df
45 Sig.
.000
Anti-image Matrices
item5 item15 item18 item25 item27 item30 item33 item35 item37 item38
Anti-image Covariance item5 .620
.112 -.241 .013 -.126 -.057
.022 .106
.024 -.167 item15
.112 .524 -.140
.104 .041 -.156 -.214
.071 -.130 .000
item18 -.241
-.140 .512 -.131
.085 -.015 .040
-.079 .030
.026 item25
.013 .104 -.131
.400 -.052 -.105 .002
-.103 -.088 -.043 item27
-.126 .041
.085 -.052 .690 -.115 -.210
.042 -.015 .036
item30 -.057
-.156 -.015 -.105 -.115 .406 -.039
-.122 -.053 .061
item33 .022
-.214 .040
.002 -.210 -.039 .533
.016 .003 -.112
item35 .106
.071 -.079 -.103 .042 -.122
.016 .358 -.010 -.179
item37 .024
-.130 .030 -.088 -.015 -.053
.003 -.010
.593 -.128 item38
-.167 .000
.026 -.043 .036
.061 -.112 -.179 -.128
.412 Anti-image Correlation item5
.624
a
.197 -.427 .026 -.193 -.113
.039 .225
.039 -.330 item15
.197 .598
a
-.269 .227
.068 -.338 -.405 .165 -.233
.000 item18
-.427 -.269 .762
a
-.288 .142 -.033
.076 -.185
.054 .057
item25 .026
.227 -.288 .847
a
-.098 -.261 .005
-.271 -.180 -.106 item27
-.193 .068
.142 -.098 .711
a
-.217 -.346 .084 -.024
.068 item30
-.113 -.338 -.033 -.261 -.217 .830
a
-.084 -.319 -.107
.148 item33
.039 -.405
.076 .005 -.346 -.084 .750
a
.037 .006 -.239
item35 .225
.165 -.185 -.271 .084 -.319
.037 .776
a
-.023 -.465 item37
.039 -.233
.054 -.180 -.024 -.107 .006
-.023 .887
a
-.259 item38
-.330 .000
.057 -.106 .068
.148 -.239 -.465 -.259 .775
a
a. Measures of Sampling AdequacyMSA
Universita Sumatera Utara
125
Communalities
Initial Extraction
item5 1.000
.793 item15
1.000 .671
item18 1.000
.559 item25
1.000 .711
item27 1.000
.688 item30
1.000 .666
item33 1.000
.714 item35
1.000 .765
item37 1.000
.585 item38
1.000 .625
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Com pone
nt Initial Eigenvalues
Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings Total
of Variance
Cumulative Total
of Variance
Cumulative Total
of Variance
Cumulative 1
4.218 42.178
42.178 4.218
42.178 42.178
3.301 33.008
33.008 2
1.555 15.547
57.725 1.555
15.547 57.725
2.175 21.746
54.754 3
1.005 10.053
67.778 1.005
10.053 67.778
1.302 13.024
67.778 4
.827 8.267
76.044 5
.668 6.680
82.724 6
.541 5.413
88.137 7
.381 3.812
91.949 8
.332 3.324
95.273 9
.266 2.663
97.936 10
.206 2.064
100.000 Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Universita Sumatera Utara
126
Rotated Component Matrix
a
Component 1
2 3
item5 .316
-.054 .831
item15 .147
.788 -.169
item18 .647
.029 .373
item25 .813
.094 .204
item27 -.031
.612 .559
item30 .603
.528 .157
item33 .150
.821 .132
item35 .872
.067 .017
item37 .624
.428 -.114
item38 .751
.164 .186
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations.
KMO and Bartletts Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .851
Bartletts Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square
246.986 df
15 Sig.
.000
Anti-image Matrices
item18 item25
item30 item35
item37 item38
Anti-image Covariance item18
.663 -.144
-.088 -.050
.022 -.043
item25 -.144
.431 -.111
-.136 -.066
-.050 item30
-.088 -.111
.553 -.107
-.156 .037
item35 -.050
-.136 -.107
.397 .007
-.188 item37
.022 -.066
-.156 .007
.640 -.164
item38 -.043
-.050 .037
-.188 -.164
.495
Universita Sumatera Utara
127
Anti-image Correlation item18
.899
a
-.269 -.146
-.097 .034
-.075 item25
-.269 .862
a
-.227 -.329
-.125 -.109
item30 -.146
-.227 .865
a
-.228 -.262
.071 item35
-.097 -.329
-.228 .824
a
.014 -.424
item37 .034
-.125 -.262
.014 .855
a
-.292 item38
-.075 -.109
.071 -.424
-.292 .823
a
a. Measures of Sampling AdequacyMSA
Communalities
Initial Extraction
item18 1.000
.461 item25
1.000 .706
item30 1.000
.580 item35
1.000 .714
item37 1.000
.472 item38
1.000 .601
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Compo nent
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total of Variance
Cumulative Total
of Variance Cumulative
1 3.534
58.904 58.904
3.534 58.904
58.904 2
.731 12.185
71.090 3
.600 9.992
81.081 4
.501 8.342
89.423 5
.360 5.996
95.419 6
.275 4.581
100.000 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Universita Sumatera Utara
128
Component Matrix
a
Component 1
item18 .679
item25 .841
item30 .761
item35 .845
item37 .687
item38 .775
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis. a. 1 components
extracted.
2. ASPEK CHANGE SPECIFIC EFFICACY KMO and Bartletts Test
