Conclusion CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

story between two stories, The Validity of Love and Devadasi. But the stucture of story in Bangles is different from both of them, whereas the three stories have the same theme. This difference is caused by the subject in each story, in The Validity of Love and Devadasi subjects are the second generation but in Bangles, subject is the first generation. The similarities in The Validity of Love and Devadasi are subject main character, sender an activator of story that is in The Validity of Love, the sender is obligation from parents and in Devadasi, clearly the sender is parents and the ending of story which the subject fails to get the object. Besides that, the differences are helper, opponent, and the causes of conflict begins. In each story raises the same problem on the subject, it is identity problem. In the story which is the second generation as a subject, such as The Validity of Love and Devadasi, the subject or main character face identity crisis but in the story of Bangles, the subject who is first generation faces diaspora identity. The crisis identity faced by second generations because they have minimalist of experience in India even though in their home environment is often heavily Indian, but may incorporate aspects of both cultures, while the environment beyond the front door is profoundly American. So, t he second generation’s identity is shaped by both and by the interaction between the two. Unlike with the first generations, generally they suffer diaspora identity because they have many experiences and the strong of tie with their original culture, India, so they always feel homesick and apply their original culture in America.

B. Suggestion

The writer suggest for the English student who wants to analyze about the actantial and functional structure in the literary work, they have to know about the structure itself and the theory that they want to use as the object of their research. Finn aly, the writer hopes this research will enrich reader’s knowledge and useful as reference. BIBLIOGRAPHY Barry, Peter. 2002. Beginning Theory; An introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Second Edition. UK: University Press. Bhatia, Sunil. 2007. American Karma: Race, Culture, and Identity in the Indian Diaspora, New York: New York University Press. Bordwell, David. 2005. The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style Mode of Production to 1960. London: Routledge. Eagleton, Terry. 1996. Literary Theory: An Introduction Second Edition. UK: Blackwell Publishing. Garcia, Cynthia. 2009. Immigrant Stories: Ethnicity and Academics in middle childhood. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1982. Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary Advances in Semiotics. United States of America: Indiana University Press. Hall, Stuart. 1990. Cultural Identity and Diaspora, Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, ed. Jonathan Rutherford, London: Lawrence and Wishart. Herman, Luc and Bart Vervaeck. 2001. Handbook of Narrative Analysis. United States of America: Thomson-Shore, Inc. Joshi, Khyati Y. 2006. New Roots in America‟s Sacred Ground: Religion, Race, And Ethnicity in Indian America. London: Rutgers University Press. Kenan, Shlomith Rimmon. 2005. Narrative Fiction. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. Lechte, John. 1994. Fifty key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Post-Modernity. New York: Routledge. Mojalefa, Mawatle Jeremiah. 2007. Rabadia Ratshatsha: Studies in African Language Literature, Linguistics. African: Sun Press.