51 The activities process in this cycle could run better than the
previous cycle. The students had become accustomed with the activities given by the teacher. Therefore, they were not afraid and shy
anymore in performing any command even though they made mistake. Finally, they could produce their own commands, and tried to make
some commands and gave those to their friends. After the teaching and learning process in the second cycle, the
writer gave a post-test to evaluate the students.
3. Observing
In the second cycle, the teacher’s performance was better than the previous cycle, it can be seen the teacher can be a good model and director
in giving the material of all the students’ behavior. Beside, the students’ performance, the students’ activities during the teaching learning process
was better than the previous cycle, it can be seen from the students’ feel when the teacher explained the material, they can response by their
physical correctly, and they also feel fun and enjoy. The last they ready to speak when they feel ready to speak the word, and they can be a good
imitators of their teacher’s commands.
4. Reflecting
This phase is aimed to reflect the completely done the action research. In this phase, the teacher and observer evaluate and discuss about
teaching learning process. First, the teacher and the observer discussed about the teacher’s method. The writer and the teacher felt very satisfied
with the result of this Classroom Action Research CAR. It can be seen from students’ score from pre-test up post-test in the cycle 2, The goal of
lesson plan also had been achieved when the teacher applied it in the classroom, beside the students also can use imperative sentences in their
daily activities, indeed the students seemed more interesting during the teaching learning process, they not only felt fun but also enjoy in teaching
52 learning process, the atmosphere of the classroom is very alive because the
students were very active and have had a big motivation to learn. Finally the observer and the teacher discussed about the improvement of the
students’ score from pre-test, post-test I and post-test II. It was proven from pre-test, the students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion-
Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 65 were four students or 16.67, The student who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria
Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 65 in post-test 1 of the first cycle were 12 students or 50, and the students who passed the Minimum Mastery
Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 65 in the post-test II of second cycle were 21 students or 87.5.
According to the result above, it can be concluded that the implementation of Classroom Action Research CAR in developing
students’ ability in using imperative sentences Through Total Physical Response TPR could be success, then the teacher and the observer
decided to stop to the next cycle.
D. The Data Analysis
