60 23
60 70
85
24 55
60
75 Mean:
_ X = ∑ x
n 50.21
60.83 75.21
The student who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 65
Based on the table above, it is showed there were four students who passed KKM in pre-test, twelve students in post-test I and twenty one students in post-
test 2. To analyze all data, the writer would calculate the students mean score of the test, calculate the class percentage, and calculate the students’ improvement
score from pre-test to post-test 1 until post-test 2 into percentage. In analyzing the data of pre-test, the first step is to get the mean score of
the test. It is calculated by using this formula:
_ ∑ x
X = ── n
_ 1205
X = ─── 24
_ X = 50.21
From that calculation, it is showed the mean score of the test in pre-test was 50.21. It means that the students’ imperative sentences mean score of pre-test
before implementing Classroom Action Research CAR or before using Total Physical Response TPR in teaching imperative sentences was 50.21.
61 Next, the step to know the percentage of students’ score who pass the
Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM in pre-test it used the formula as follow:
F P = ── X 100
N
4 P = ── X 100
24
P = 16.67
From the calculation above, it is known the students’ percentage score is 16.67.
It means that there are 4 students who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and there are 20 students who still get the
score below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM, from the percentage above, the writer gave the diagram to show the
students’ achievement in understanding imperative sentences is still low. The diagram as following:
62
5 10
15 20
25 30
Nilai 65
Nilai 65 KKM
Nilai 65
The Result of Students Score
before Implementation
After that, the researcher calculated the result of post-test in cycle 1 to know the students’ score improvement from the pre-test to post-test 1 result. The
first step is calculating the mean score of post-test 1. It is calculated by using the formula:
_ ∑ x
X = ── n
_ 1460
X = ─── 24
_ X = 60.83
From the computation above, the students’ mean score of post-test in cycle
1 is 60.83. It means that there are some improvements in conducting the action by using TPR. It could be seen from the pre-test mean score 50.21 to the post-test 1
63
mean score 60.83. So it can be concluded that there is improvement of students’ score until 10.63 60.83– 50.21.
The next step is to get the percentage of students’ improvement score from pre-test to post-test 1. The writer used the formula:
y1 - y P = ─── X 100
y
60.83 – 50.21 P = ──────── X 100
50.21
10.63 P = ──── X 100
50.21
P = 21.16
Based on the computation above, it could be seen that the percentage of the students’ improvement in understanding of imperative sentences from pre-test
to post-test 1 is 21.16. It means that the score in cycle 1 has improved
Therefore; the writer must conduct the post-test 2 in the second cycle, because it still needed more improvement to achieve the target of Classroom Action
Research 75. Finally, to get the percentage of students who pass the Minimum Mastery
Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM the calculation by using the formula:
F P = ── X 100
N
12
64 P = ── X 100
24
P = 50
Based on the absolute numerical above, it is showed the percentage of students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal
KKM in post-test I is 50. It is concluded the students’ improvement in post-
test I who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal
KKM is 33.33 50 - 16.67. It is calculated there are twelve students who
pass the KKM and there are twelve students who get the score below the standard of the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM. Even
though it is still needed more improvement because it could not achieve yet 75 as the target of success Classroom Action Research CAR. The students’ score
who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM, It could be seen from the diagram below:
5 10
15 20
25 30
Nilai 65
Nilai 65 KKM
Nilai 65
The Result of Students Score
in Post-Test I
After the writer conducted cycle two of Classroom Action Research, she gave to the students a test in order to know and to prove whether the application
of using TPR in teaching imperative sentences successful and effective or not either from the result of pre-test or post-test 1. There are three steps to know this
65 improvement. Those are: first step is to calculate the mean score of the test in
post-test 2, it is used the formula: _
∑ x X = ──
n
_ 1805
X = ─── 24
_ X = 75.21
From that calculation, the mean score of post-test 2 in the cycle 2 is 75.21. It showed that there are some students’ improvement score 14.38 75.21-60.83
from the mean score of post-test in cycle 1. Second step is to know the calculation of the percentage of students’
improvement score. The writer used the formula: y2 - y
P = ──── X 100 y
75.21 – 50.21 P = ───────── X 100
50.21 25.00
P = ──── X 100 50.02
P = 49.79
From the computation above, it could be known that the students’ score in the
post-test 2 improves 33.12 49.79-16.67 from pre-test and 28.63 49.79-21.16
from the post-test in cycle 1.
66 Then the next step is to calculate the percentage from the students’ score
who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM in post-test 2. The writer used the formula:
F P = ── X 100
N 21
P = ── X 100 24
P = 87.5
Based on absolute calculation above, it is known the percentage of students who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal
KKM is 87.5. it means that in cycle 2 there are 21 students who pass the
Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and there are only 3 students are below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan
Minimal KKM. The class percentage of post–test 2 obviously showed some
improvements from the previous test, the improvement is 70.83 87.5- 16.67
from the pre-test. The highest score in this post-test 2 is 90 and the lowest score is 60. The students’ score who pass the Minimum Mastery Criterion-
Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and who still below the Minimum Mastery Criterion-Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM it can be seen in the diagram
below:
67
5 10
15 20
25 30
Nilai 65
Nilai 65 KKM
Nilai 65 The Result of
Students Score in Post-
Test II
E. The Interpretation of Test Result
Based on the result of the pre-test, the post-test 1 and the post-test 2, the writer can interpret the data, and she also gave the diagram before describing the
results of pre-test, post test 1 and post-test 2. Here it is the diagram:
5 10
15 20
25 30
Nilai 65 Nilai 65
KKM Nilai 65
Pre Test Post Test I
Post Test II
Kategori