Reliability and Validity Data Analysis

incorrect answer. The rest of students, 63 students in total, have score 20-60. The other fact is that there are six students who answered all the questions incorrectly. Part B consists of six essay-questions about changing active-causative sentences into passive-causative sentences. The table below shows the result of the number of students ranged by the score. Table 4.2 The Number of Students Ranged by Score in Part B Score Number of Students 100 11 83 8 67 14 50 8 33 6 17 12 24 Total 83 The table shows that there are eleven students answered all questions in Part B correctly but twenty four students answered it all wrong. Eight students get the scores of 83 and 50 in the test. There are fourteen students who answered 4 questions correctly. Finally, there are eighteen students who get the score below average, which are 33 and 17 as the scores. In short conclusion, there are 19 students who get score above 80, and there are 64 students who get score below 70. Last, the students’ second language acquisition is measured in Part C which contains of four questions. Here, the students were asked to choose one they thought was suitable for the answer from four options in each number. Table 4.3 The Number of Students Ranged by Score in Part C Score Number of Students 100 13 75 22 50 21 25 25 2 Total 83 Part C has thirteen students who answered four questions correctly. The highest amount 25 of students answered one question only correctly. There are twenty two students who answered three questions correctly and twenty one students answered two questions correctly. However, the number of students who got the lowest score in Part C was only two people. The following data shows the number of students ranged by score from all 15 questions of the test. Table 4.4 The Number of Students Ranged by Score in Whole Test Score Number of Students 80-93 6 60-73 14 40-53 36 20-33 24 7-13 3 Total 83 The result shows that there is none of students who could answer all the questions in the test correctly and there is no student who gets score 0. There are six students who achieve score 80-93. Then, about fourteen students gain score of 60- 73. It is clear that there are twenty students who achieve score above 60. Meanwhile, as many as thirty-six students achieve score 40-53, and twenty four students have 20-33 as the score. Finally, the data shows that there are three students who answered two from fifteen questions correctly.

B. Types of Students’ Errors

The explanation of students’ errors will be divided by each part of the test: Part A, Part B, and Part C. Part A contains of several questions that aim to find out students’ comprehension of different functions between make, have, get causatives and the form of active- causatives. Part B is designed to measure students’ ability to understand the change of active-causatives into passive-causatives. Part C is designed to measure students’ second language acquisition. The errors in students’ answers will be categorized into four types: misformation, omission, addition, and misordering.

1. Students’ Errors in Part A

Part A has five valid questions in the result. The table below shows the data of errors ranged by error types. Table 4.5 Data of Errors in Part A Note: MF  Misformation; MO  Misordering Type of Error The Number of Error in Question: Total Errors 1 2 3 4 5 MF 58 67 36 34 10 205 MO 5 5