Place and Time of the Study The Object of the Study

F. The Technique of Data Analyzing

The obtained data is analyzed in the way that in line with the technique of conducting this study. Starting by the attempt of answering the research question, the writer analyzes the conformity level and the unconformity level of the English summative test to the syllabus in term of content validity. The writer analyzed which test items number have confirmed and have not confirmed to the syllabus in a checklist table qualitatively. Quantitatively, the writer measures the attainment of a content validity of the test items by using this formula: P= X 100 P= A percentage of attainment f = Frequency N = Number of cases 4 The formula above is used for getting the total percentage about the conformity of the English summative tests towards the indicators in English syllabus. Moreover, the attainment result of analyzing the three English summative tests in three vocational schools is described. In describing the result, the conformity attainment percentage number changes into predicate category based on Arikunto’s criteria. The writer also calculates the attainment of indicators cover in the English summative test by the same formula that has been explained by Anas Sudijono. Here the following of Arikunto’s criteria that is used for describing the attainment result of conformity and inconformity of English summative test’s item with syllabus: 4 Prof. Drs. Anas Sudijono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2011,p. 43. Table 3.1 Criteria of test results percentage 5 The highest level falls in the percentage of 81- 100 which means “excellent”. The good level falls in the percentage of 61-80. The sufficient level falls in the percentage of 41-60. The insufficient level falls in the percentage of 21-40. The lowest level is poor which falls in the percentage of 0-20. In addition, the data interview is used for getting the additional information of the final research finding in this skripsi by coding the transcript of each interview. 5 Suharsini Arikunto, Manajemen Penelitian, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2005, p. 44. 81-100 61- 80 41-60 21-40 0-20 Excellent Good Sufficient Insufficient Poor