Significance Test for Independent Variables

69 the nature of logistic function. In other word, the altitude and slope might not become people’s consideration to transform the existing land use into other land uses to fulfill their needs in Siak District. The similar consideration might also happen for distance from health service and the area of sub district which both variables did not contribute significantly to the land use change in Siak District. For instance, the area of sub district and distance from health service were not considered by people in transforming the forest to crop plantation or from agriculture area to settlement area. On the contrary, the development of settlement may be able to motivate government to develop the health service near the settlement area. Table 15. Likelihood Ratio Tests for All Significant Variables Likelihood Ratio Tests 29535.707 158.726 25 .000 29454.986 78.005 25 .000 31247.253 1870.272 25 .000 30628.102 1251.121 25 .000 31781.668 2404.687 25 .000 29578.108 201.127 25 .000 31779.854 2402.873 25 .000 29431.426 54.445 25 .001 29488.730 111.749 25 .000 29427.464 50.483 25 .002 29429.034 52.053 25 .001 29418.559 41.578 25 .020 29441.404 64.423 25 .000 29475.306 98.325 25 .000 29417.749 40.768 25 .024 29425.812 48.831 25 .003 29442.620 65.639 25 .000 29473.133 96.151 25 .000 29433.467 56.485 25 .000 29510.285 133.304 25 .000 29570.020 193.039 25 .000 29451.609 74.628 25 .000 29467.936 90.955 25 .000 29449.923 72.942 25 .000 29460.043 83.062 25 .000 Effect Intercept RIVDIST FRSTDIST02 CROPDIST02 GRASDIST02 WETDIST02 OTHEDIST02 KWSID RTRWPID CONCESSID POPDENS02 ANIMDIST ECONDIST EDUCDIST ENVIDIST FISHDIST GOVDIST INDUSTDIST MININGDIST ROADDIST SETTLEDIST TELCOMDIST TRANSMDIST TRANSPDIST PUBSPADIST -2 Log Likelihood of Reduced Model Model Fitting Criteria Chi-Square df Sig. Likelihood Ratio Tests The chi-square statistic is the difference in -2 log-likelihoods between the final model and a reduced model. The reduced model is formed by omitting an effect from the final model. The null hypothesis is that all parameters of that effect are 0. 70

1.4.2.2 Significance Test for Final Model 1

st Scenario In the previous activity, the MLR model analysis has determined which variables could contribute significantly into the land use change model. From 28 variables that have been analyzed, there are 24 variables considered as important variables which have driven the land use change in Siak District during 2002 – 2005. The MLR model analysis has also simulated the final model of land use change in Siak District by considering the important variables found. There were two tests which have been done in order to determine whether the final model were adequate to explain the land use change happen in Siak District or not. The tests done were Likelihood Ratio Test of the final model and Pseudo R-Square statistics. The model fitting information in SPSS outputs shows the Likelihood Ratio Test of the Final model against one in which all the parameter coefficients are 0 Null. A likelihood ratio test shows that the model fits the data better than a null model. Based on the model fitting information which has been produced, the significance level of the likelihood ratio test for the final model of land use change in Siak District is 0.000. Its significance level is less than 0.05 Sig.0.05 which may be concluded that the final model which has been produced was outperforming the Null. In this case, by considering the significant variables driving factors determined before, the land use change model of Siak District that has been developed might fit the data better than a null model, and it could be concluded as a good fit model. Table 16. Likelihood Ratio Test of the Final Model 1 st Scenario Model Fitting Information 53960.379 29376.981 24583.398 600 .000 Model Intercept Only Final -2 Log Likelihood Model Fitting Criteria Chi-Square df Sig. Likelihood Ratio Tests 71 Table 17. Pseudo R-Square Statistics 1 st Scenario Pseudo R-Square .914 .919 .456 Cox and Snell Nagelkerke McFadden The pseudo r-squared statistics are designed to have similar properties to the true r-squared statistic, which measures the variability in the dependent variable that is explained by a linear regression model. Larger pseudo r-squared statistics indicate that more of the variation is explained by the model, to a maximum of 1. There were three approaches of pseudo r-squared statistics which have been done in this research which have been proposed by Cox and Snell, Nagelkerke, and McFadden. Based on the computation, pseudo r-squared statistics, either Cox and Snell or Nagelkerke, indicate that the variability of the land use change in Siak District as dependent variable can be explained more than 0.91, whereas according to McFadden, it is only 0.456. In other word, according to Cox and Snell and Nagelkerke, more than 91 of the variability of land use change in Siak District can be explained by the final model developed, and McFadden indicate only 45.6 of the variability can be explained by the model. However, in general the pseudo r-squared statistics that have been produced indicates that most of variability in land use change which happen in Siak District could be explained by the final model. The two tests for final model which have been conducted, likelihood ratio test for the final model and pseudo r-squared, indicate that the final model of land use change in Siak District which has been developed by using MLR model is a good model that can explain most of the variability of land use change in the research site. The significant variables that have been determined can be concluded as general driving factors which drive the land use transitions in Siak District. Furthermore, these research findings, which have been interpreted from the statistical computation, should be spatially compared to the actual condition in order to validate the performance of the MLR model when the model is applied in spatial manner.