commit to user 36
F. Review of Related Research
Kamal  Muhtar    2010  conducted  a  classroom  action  research  entitled
“Improving  Students’  Reading  Comprehension  through  Semantic  mapping Strategy’. The subject of this research is the eighth grade students of SMPN 1
Sine  in  the  academic  year  of  20092010.  It  was  conducted  for  about  two  years. The  objective  of  the  research  was  to  examine  whether  the  use  of  semantic
mapping strategy can improve the students’ reading comprehension. The results of the  research  showed  that  semantic  mapping  strategy  was  able  to  improve  the
students’ reading comprehension and the class situation also improved. The class became  more  enjoyable  and  fun.  The  students  became  more  active  individually
and in group. There were some advantages of using semantic mapping strategy in teaching-learning of reading as  follows:  1 using the semantic mapping strategy
in  the  pre-reading  phase  could  stimulat e  the  students’  prior  knowledge
schemata;  2  using  the  semantic  mapping  strategy  in  the  whilst-reading  phase helped the students to record the information obtained from the text; and 3 using
the  semantic  mapping  strategy  in  the  post-reading  phase  provided  the  students with an overall description about the text.
Swee  et.  al.  2003  in  the  article  entitled  “Developing  Reflective  and Thinking  skills  by  Means  of  Semantic  Mapping  Strategis    in  Kindergarten
Teacher Education
” concluded that the use of semantic mapping strategies as a tool  for  develophing  reflective  and  thinking  startegies  among  kindergarten
students-teachers.  Strategies  applied  to  alleviating  these  worries  and  negative feeling  included  clarification  of  the  basic  concept,  assessment  criteria  and
teaching  strategies  to  be  adopted.  Most  important  of  all    was  a  realization  that
commit to user 37
modelling  reflective  practice  was  essential  if  students-teachers  were  expected  to experience reflective practice in action for themselves so that they could become
reflective practicioners as well. Another  study  about  semantic  mapping  comes  from  Susilowati  2006.
She carried out the study entitled
“Improving Studens’ Writing Skill by  Using Semamntic Mapping” at eleventh grade students of SMA Negri 2 Ungaran
in  athe  academic  year  of  20052006.  From  the  result,  it  was  known  that
semantic  mapping  is  effective  for  improving  skill  on  writing  report  text.  It  was proved by increasing of scoring rate. The scoring rate for pre-cycle is 5.05, while
in  the  first  cycle,  the  scoring  rate  is  5.77  and  for  the  second  cycle  getting  score 6.92.  She  also  explained  that  semantic  mapping  in  improving  writing  skill  can
help students to organize the imformation they have systematically. The quality of the students writing can be influenced by choicing the right topic.
Zaid.  1955  wrote  a  paper  entitled
“Semantic  Mapping  in Communicative Language Teaching”, He tried to show how semantic mapping
can bocome an effective technique in the CLT classroom. A map, like a picture, can  be  worth  a  thousand  words.  It  can  stimulate  the  EFL  students  to  talk,  and
encourage them to listen. Semantic Mapping incorporates many of aspect of CLT which have been found to benefit students in a learning second language such as:
it is students centered, interactive activity, predictive activity, intergrative activity, etc.
Other research on semantic mapping was conducted by  Aprilianto 2009 who  carried  out  a  classroom  action  reserach  entitled  Using  Semantic  Mapping
Technique  to  Improve  Reading  Ability  of  IX-  Grade  of MTs Ma’arif Sukorejo-
commit to user 38
Pasuruan. This research find out that semantic mapping technique is successful in improving  both  the  students’  ability  in  comprehending  English  text  and
thestudents’ involvement in reading activity. The improvement can be seen from the
students’ mean score and individual score precentage from preliminary study to cycle 2.  The students’ mean score had improved greatly from 35.00 to 68.33.
While, the students’ individual score extented from 0 to 44.44  equal than 70. The  scores  obtained  by  the  students  in  the  two  cycles  were  shown  by  reading
comprehension tests. Last, Raizienie, Saule and Bronishlava Grigaite 2005 wrote on journal of
the humanities and social sciences entiled
“Developing Child’s thinking skill by Semantic  Mapping  Str
ategies”.  In  this  journal,    they  explained  that  semantic
mappingwebbing  can  be  used  for  promoting  teachers  and  school  principals reflective  and  critical  thinking  skills.  It  also  examined  cognitive  outcomes,
stimulated  by  the  teacher  use  of  semantic  mapping  as  a  strategy  for  accelerating two cognitive operations, classification, and seriation in a child’s seventh year.
G. Rationale