54
Table 4.7: The Weaknesses on the Designed Materials
Evaluators Weaknesses
Evaluator A
The designed materials are lack of example.
Evaluator B It will be difficult to teach them about speaking skill since this is the
first time for students to learn speaking. Evaluator C
It will take a long time for students to make a mind map in every
meeting. Some instructions use high language focus.
Evaluator D
There are some high vocabularies that can make students difficult to
understand. There are many grammatical mistakes on the designed materials.
Evaluator E
Mind mapping is a new media for students and it will take a long time for students to adapt this media in their learning activities
especially in speaking.
e. The Evaluators’ Opinion of the Strengths on the Designed Materials.
In the open-ended questionnaires, the writer asked about the strengths on the designed materials. The evaluators wrote the strengths of the designed
materials in the questionnaire. The results of the evaluators‟ opinion are provided on Table 4.8.
Table 4.8: The Strengths on the Designed Materials
Evaluators Strengths
Evaluator A The themes build the students to focus on the topic.
It can make students easier to remember their idea. Evaluator B
The materials are easy to understand for the eleventh grade students of SMA N 1 Ngaglik.
Mind mapping is able to organize the students‟ thinking to write the big idea.
Evaluator C The layout is easy to read.
The designed materials are full colored. Evaluator D
The designed materials have an interesting topic. Mind mapping is going to help students make the outline of their
materials of speaking. Evaluator E
The designed materials provide some well-ordered mind mappings. The designed materials sharpen the students‟ understanding on the
content.
55
f. The Evaluators’ Suggestions on the Designed Materials
The writer really needed some suggestions in order to make this designed materials better. The evaluators gave positive suggestion on the designed
materials and it was very good for the writer to improve the designed materials. Table 4.9 provided
the evaluators‟ suggestion for the designed materials. Table 4.9: The Suggestions for the Designed Materials
Evaluators Suggestions
Evaluator A The writer may provide more examples in each unit.
Evaluator B The topic should be related to the students‟ life.
Evaluator C The writer can change the instructions with simple language
focus The mind mappings should use the same color on the same
branch. Evaluator D
The writer can change some high vocabularies and make it easier to be understood by the students.
Revise some grammatical mistakes on the designed materials. Evaluator E
Improve more examples to make students understand the topic. The writer can use topic that is around the students‟ environment.
9. Revising the Designed Materials
After getting the suggestions from the evaluators, the writer revised the designed materials. The writer did some revisions to improve the designed
materials based on the respondents‟ suggestions. The description of the revision is presented as follows.
a. The writer revised some grammatical mistakes in the designed materials.
b. The writer revised some language focuses.
c. The writer input some examples in each unit.
d. The writer changed some high vocabularies and makes it easier to
understand. e.
The writer improves the layout and makes it interesting. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
