53
Table 4. 4 The Expected topics proposed by the respondents
No Language Functions
Number of Respondents
who chose the topics
Note
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Greetings and Introductions Offering Services
Telephoning Giving Direction of Tourist
Destinations Describing Tourist
Destinations Describing Cultural Events
Giving Tourism Information Telling History
15 14
12 15
14 12
15 12
The staffs of Culture and tourism Department in Sleman
needed those language functions in the situation
during their work.
2. The Results of the Survey Research on the Designed Materials
In order to get feedback to revise and to improve the designed materials, the writer distributed the designed materials to five respondents consisted of one
English Language Education Study Program lecturer, three instructors from several English courses, and one of staffs of Culture and Tourism Department in
Sleman. The data of the respondents were presented in table 4.5.
Table 4. 5 The Description of the respondents.
Sex Education Background
Teaching Experiences
in Years Group of
Respondents F M S1 S2 S3 1-2 3-5 5
Lecturer 1 - - - 1 - - 1
Instructors 2 1 2 - 1 2 - 1
Learner 1
- -
1 -
- -
-
After the questionnaire completed, the total number for each item was counted. As stated in the questionnaires sheets, the scores from 1-5 in the
column indicate the degree of agreement given by the respondents. They are 1 =
54
strongly disagree with the statement, 2 = disagree with statement, 3 = doubtful, 4 = agree with the statement, 5 = strongly agree with the statement.
At the end of the questionnaires, respondents were asked to give opinions and suggestions. The result of the questionnaires distributed to four respondents
can be seen in table 4. 6.
Table 4. 6 The List of Respondent’s Evaluation
Central Tendency No
Respondents’ opinion N M
1 The General Instructional Objectives GIOs are well
formulated. 5 4
2 The specific instructional Objectives SIOs are well
formulated. 5 4
3 The materials match with the goals and objectives.
5 4
4 The topics are well arranged.
5 3,4 5
The difficulty of the materials is appropriate with what should be given to the learners.
5 3,2 6
The conversation of each is relevant to the topic. 5
4 7
The discussion of language focus in each unit has been presented properly.
5 3,4 8
The exercises are well elaborated and can facilitate the learners to achieve the goal.
5 4 9
Generally, the instructional materials are well elaborated
5 3,2
The respondents also contributed their suggestions that were very useful for revision and improvement of the designed materials. The writer found several
points of suggestions. 1.
The writer was suggested to give longer duration in each meeting 2.
The writer was suggested to give sufficient exercises to train the learners using the appropriate useful expressions.
3. The writer was suggested to check any misspelling and grammatical mistakes
in order to avoid giving bad examples to the learners.
55
4. The writer was suggested to add more grammar focus on language focus.
C. Discussion
