Data Description RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

43

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

A. Data Description

In order to know the result of the test, the writer provided the score of students which was gained from the test conducted in pre-test and pos-test in a table and in order to make the result of the test clearer the writer also provided the comparison table to show the differences between students score in pre-test table and post-test table. The following table is the table of students score in pre-test which known also as the result of students’ speaking score before being taught using “Find Someone Who” game. Table 4.1 Students Speaking Score The Score of Students Pre-test X 1 No Pre-test X 1 No Pre-test X 1 1 56 14 34 2 33 15 44 3 50 16 53 4 49 17 71 5 44 18 37 6 43 19 46 7 37 20 50 8 50 21 33 9 48 22 56 10 33 23 55 11 50 24 53 12 61 25 33 13 65 From the table above can be seen that the lowest score of pre-test was 33; meanwhile the highest score of pre-test was 71 and the mean score of pre-test was 47.36. In pre-test there are two highest frequencies of score which occurs four times: 33 and 50 and nine lowest frequencies of score which only occur once there are: 34, 43, 46, 48, 49, 55, 61, 65, and 71. Furthermore, in order to find out the differences between students score, the writer showed the result of students’ pos- test or the test which conducted after the students being taught using “Find Someone Who” game in the following table: Table 4.2 Students Speaking Score The Score of Students Post-test X 2 No Pre-test X 1 No Pre-test X 1 1 67 14 65 2 52 15 65 3 59 16 69 4 65 17 76 5 63 18 50 6 63 19 46 7 52 20 55 8 57 21 59 9 65 22 69 10 33 23 61 11 55 24 61 12 50 25 53 13 73 From the table of post-test above can be seen that the lowest score of post-test was 33; whereas the highest score of post-test was 76 which indicates that there are some improvement in the score of post-test. The mean score of pre-test was 59.32. In post-test the highest frequency of score which occurs four times is 65 and the lowest frequencies of score which only occur once there are: 33, 46, 53, 57, 67, 73 and 76. B. Data Analysis The data which gained from pre-test and post-test will be calculated in order to find out the mean differences between the score from pre-test which taken before the students were given the treatment using “Find Someone Who” game and the score from post-test which taken after students were given the treatment using “Find Someone Who” game. The following table will show the average score that occur between pre-test and post-test: Table 4.3 Gained Score of Students’ Pre-test and Post-test The Comparison between the Score of Pre-test X 1 and the Score of Post- test X 2 Student X 1 X 2 D D ̅ D – ̅ 2 X 1 – X 2 1 56 67 11 -0.96 0.92 2 33 52 19 7.04 49.56 3 50 59 9 -2.96 8.76 4 49 65 16 4.04 16.32 5 44 63 19 7.04 49.56 6 43 63 20 8.04 64.64 7 37 52 15 3.04 9.24 8 50 57 7 -4.96 24.60 9 48 65 17 5.04 25.40 10 33 33 -11.96 143.04 11 50 55 5 -6.96 48.44 12 61 50 -11 -22.96 527.16 13 65 73 8 -3.96 15.68 14 34 65 31 19.04 362.52 15 44 65 21 9.04 81.72 16 53 69 16 4.04 16.32 17 71 76 5 -6.96 48.44 18 37 50 13 1.04 1.08 19 46 46 -11.96 143.04 20 50 55 5 -6.96 48.44 21 33 59 26 14.04 197.12 22 56 69 13 1.04 1.08 23 55 61 6 -5.96 35.52 24 53 61 8 -3.96 15.68 25 33 53 20 8.04 64.64 N = 25 Ʃ X 1 = 1184 Ʃ X 2 = 1483 Ʃ D = 299 Ʃ D ̅ =

0.00 Ʃ D–

̅ 2 = 1998.96 After finding out the differences between X 1 pre-test and X 2 post-test which will considers as data D, the next step is finding out the average score from data D and in order to find out the mean of D ̅ the writer used the following formula: ̅ = ∑ ̅ = = Furthermore, after the writer found the differences between score D and ̅ by subtracting them; finally, the result of calculation process between D and ̅ will be squared see Table 4.3 in order to find out the standard deviation of sample using the following formula: √ ∑ ̅ √ √ = = 9.14 Moreover, after gaining the result of standard deviation from sample, the writer calculated the standard deviation from ̅ in order to gain the t-score from this study t which calculated using the following formula: t ̅ ̅ ̅ √ √ = 1.83 t = ̅ = 6.53 Furthermore, the result of calculation process which has been elaborated above will show the degree of differences which is occur between X 1 and X 2 and the degree of differences between X 1 and X 2 is 6.53. Finally, in order to complete the result of this study the writer made a comparison from the score of t based on dk derajat kebebasan or known also as degree of freedom df using the following formula: dk = N – 1 dk = 25 – 1 dk = 24 In consequence, based on t table dk = 24 at level significant 1 and 5 are: t table at significant level 1 = 2.797 t table at significant level 5 = 2.064 In consequence, the result was 2.064 6.53 2.797 and it showed that t t-observation was higher than t table .

C. Hypotheses

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of Information-Gap Toward Students' Speaking Skill (A Quasi Experimental Research at the Second Grade Students of MTs Khazanah Kebajikan Pondok Cabe Ilir)

16 106 107

The effectiveness of small group discussion on students' speaking skill A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of MTs. Darul Ma'arif Jakarta

0 3 89

The Effectiveness of pictures towards Students' Writing Skill of Descriptive Text ( A Quasi-experimental Study at Tenth Grade of SMK Islamiyah Ciputat)

0 13 86

The Influence Of Using Information Gap Activities Toward Students’ Speaking Skill (A Quasi Experimental Study At The Second Grade Students Of Senior High School Darussalam Ciputat Tangerang Selatan In The Academic Year Of 2013/2014)

0 6 133

The effectiveness of using games to improve students' vocabulary (a quasi-experimental study at the tenth grade students of SMA Nusantara 1 Tangerang)

0 3 138

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING NEAR-PEER ROLE MODELING (NPRM) ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade of SMPN 3 South Tangerang)

0 32 113

The effectiveness of classroom debate to improve students' speaking skilll (a quasi-experimental study at the elevent year student of SMAN 3 south Tangerang)

1 33 122

The Effectiveness Of Blog On Students’ Writing Of Narrative Text (A Pre-Experimental Study At Tenth Year Students Of Sman 3 Tangerang Selatan)

0 6 160

The Effectiveness of Guided Question Technique on Students' Writing Skill of Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of MTs. Negeri 13 Jakarta)

0 3 129

THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL ANALAYSIS ON LOCAL WISDOM- BASED TOPICS (A Study at the First Year Grade of Mathematics Department of Unswagati

0 0 7