World Bank Group’s Effe ti eness and Results World Bank Group’s Effectiveness and Results continued

83

C. World Bank Group’s Effe ti eness and Results

1. In your opinion, how IMPORTANT is it for the World Bank Group to be involved in the following areas of development in Afghanistan? 1-Not important at all, 10-Very important Importance N DK Mean SD 1. Crime and violence 239 53 5.33 3.65 2. Financial markets 254 29 7.52 2.73 3. Transport 270 31 7.94 2.43 4. Anti corruption 278 29 7.21 3.21 5. Regional conflict and tensions 239 36 5.85 3.25 6. Law and justice 258 32 6.90 3.17 7. Urban development 277 20 7.52 2.64 8. Environmental sustainability 256 22 6.87 2.92 9. Regulatory framework 240 39 5.70 3.05 10. Information and communications technology 248 33 7.48 2.63 11. Poverty reduction 285 22 8.70 2.22 12. Gender equity 249 32 6.69 3.05 13. Private sector development 261 36 7.79 2.55 14. Foreign direct investment 260 36 7.60 2.74 15. Local governance and institutions 265 28 7.15 2.93 16. Water and sanitation 260 24 7.76 2.68 17. Trade and exports 265 27 7.96 2.54 18. Economic growth 289 24 8.80 2.26 19. Energy 285 30 8.80 2.13 20. Disaster management 243 41 7.43 2.71 21. Public sector governance reform 248 50 7.57 2.59 22. Job creationemployment 274 26 8.26 2.49 23. Social cohesion 253 36 6.77 2.91 24. Communicablenon-communicable diseases 251 33 6.80 2.88 25. Equality of opportunity 255 33 7.23 2.86 26. Health 269 27 8.20 2.29 27. Rural development 266 26 8.04 2.35 28. Regional integration and cooperation 238 37 7.35 2.66 29. Food security 247 29 7.30 2.73 30. Natural resource management 253 34 7.95 2.83 31. Securitystabilizationreconstruction 300 24 8.47 2.62 32. Social protection 249 39 6.99 2.74 33. Climate change 239 41 6.66 2.90 34. Agricultural development 296 24 8.87 2.14 35. Education 302 23 9.15 1.81 84

C. World Bank Group’s Effectiveness and Results continued

2. How EFFECTIVE do you believe the World Bank Group is in terms of the work it does in the following areas of development in Afghanistan? 1-Not effective at all, 10-Very effective Effectiveness N DK Mean SD 1. Anti corruption 202 145 4.96 3.35 2. Information and communications technology 195 118 7.12 2.70 3. Transport 245 70 7.11 2.59 4. Crime and violence 207 109 4.82 3.10 5. Regional conflict and tensions 185 123 5.10 3.27 6. Law and justice 210 99 5.80 3.10 7. Urban development 240 70 6.93 2.85 8. Environmental sustainability 219 84 6.27 3.03 9. Regulatory framework 189 114 5.33 3.17 10. Communicablenon-communicable diseases 204 100 6.52 2.88 11. Poverty reduction 247 66 6.97 2.92 12. Gender equity 223 89 6.52 2.81 13. Private sector development 217 89 6.93 2.68 14. Foreign direct investment 213 93 6.55 2.82 15. Local governance and institutions 235 77 6.49 3.03 16. Water and sanitation 233 73 6.62 2.81 17. Trade and exports 221 92 6.53 2.87 18. Economic growth 254 64 7.24 2.77 19. Energy 229 83 6.35 3.06 20. Disaster management 186 111 6.15 3.05 21. Public sector governance reform 194 108 6.06 2.84 22. Job creationemployment 240 65 6.80 2.96 23. Social cohesion 201 97 5.76 3.01 24. Financial markets 195 99 6.02 3.06 25. Equality of opportunity 207 96 5.67 2.94 26. Health 243 70 7.16 2.63 27. Rural development 227 69 7.68 2.27 28. Regional integration and cooperation 179 118 6.12 2.84 29. Food security 206 99 6.72 2.72 30. Education 259 60 7.66 2.55 31. Securitystabilizationreconstruction 253 70 6.83 3.15 32. Social protection 201 107 6.07 3.06 33. Climate change 194 116 5.68 3.11 34. Agricultural development 261 59 7.53 2.70 35. Natural resource management 206 111 6.31 3.38 . Whe e a e the Wo ld Ba k G oup’s de isio s ade p i a il that suppo t the program in Afghanistan? Select only ONE response Percentage of Respondents N=393 At the Headquarters in Washington D.C. 48.3 In the country 12.7 Dont know 38.9 Achieving Development Results N DK Mean SD 4. To hat e te t does the Wo ld Ba k G oup’s o k help to a hie e de elop e t results in Afghanistan? 1-To no degree at all, 10-To a very significant degree 332 61 7.22 2.55 85

C. World Bank Group’s Effe ti eness and Results ontinued