32
VI. Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness
continued
Effectiveness of Sectoral Areas: Year Comparison
9
9
Only those sectoral areas that were asked in the FY’08, FY’12 and FY’15 Country Surveys are explored in this chart. All means presented in this chart are calculated based on weighted data. See Appendix F for details.
7.7 7.7
7.6 7.4
7.4 7.3
7.3 7.2
7.1 7.1
6.8 6.7
6.7 6.6
6.6 6.6
6.6 6.5
6.5 6.5
6.5 6.4
6.3 6.2
6.0 6.0
5.9 5.9
5.6 5.5
5.4 6.4
6.7 5.8
6.2 6.2
5.1 5.7
6.0 5.3
5.7 5.0
5.0 5.3
4.9 5.2
5.2 5.4
5.2 5.3
5.3 5.0
4.5 4.5
4.4 4.6
4.5 4.9
4.8 4.2
3.8 4.4
7.7 7.5
7.8 7.9
7.9 6.6
7.2 7.0
6.6
6.8 7.1
6.7 6.6
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Rural development Education
Agricultural development Transport
Health Poverty reduction
Economic growth Information and communications technology
Urban development Private sector development
Food security Natural resource management
Securitystabilizationreconstruction Job creationemployment
Communicablenon-communicable diseases Local governance and institutions
Gender equity Foreign direct investment
Water and sanitation Trade and exports
Energy Disaster management
Environmental sustainability Law and justice
Financial markets Social cohesion
Social protection Regional integration and cooperation
Equality of opportunity Anti corruption
Regulatory framework Mean Effectiveness Rating
FY 2015 FY 2012
FY 2008
How EFFECTIVE do you believe the World Bank Group is in terms of the work it does in the following areas of development in Afghanistan?1-Not effective at all, 10-Very effective
Significantly different between FY15 and FY08; Significantly different between FY15 and FY12 Note: means in this chart are calculated based on weighted data
33
VI. Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness
continued
Effectiveness of Sectoral Areas: Year Comparison continued
Year comparison:
This year’s respondents had significantly higher ratings for the WBG’s effectiveness in all of the areas listed in the chart than respondents in FY’12.
Year comparison
: Compared to respondents in the FY’08 Survey, this year’s respondents gave significantly lower
ratings for the WBG’s effectiveness in the following sectoral areas:
Anti corruption; Regulatory framework;
Poverty reduction; Health;
Regional integration and cooperation; and Social protection.
Year comparison
: Compared to respondents in the FY’08 Survey, this year’s respondents gave significantly higher
ratings for the WBG’s effectiveness in “urban development.
”
34
VI. Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness
continued
Effectiveness of Sectoral Areas: Collaboration
8.2 8.1
